RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      成果給制度에 대한 地方公務員의 認識調査 : 慶尙南道 下位職公務員을 중심으로 = (A) Study on Local Civil Servants' Recognition of Pay for Performance System : Focused on Lower Level Civil Servants in Gyungsangnamdo

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9167562

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Nowadays we are living in endless changes due to globalization, information, democratization, and localizaion. To respond these needs, to build up the competition among civil servants, and to promote working atmosphere, the Korean government has been managing pay for performance system.
      In the pay for performance system, workers are paid differently according to their achievements. The purpose of the policy is to realize the principle of equity and to increase the productivity. The monetary reward will promote working atmosphere and create the competition among civil servants in public office community.
      Currently, the Korean government pays annual income based on the performance for the civil servants whose ranks are above the director of a bureau, whereas civil servants ranked below the head of a department are raised differently based on the performance.
      The pay for performance system has been criticized severely since the system applied in 2001. Civil servants reallot their allowances which were paid differently based on the performance evenly to all of them or they return the rewards based on the performance. They are strongly asking to change the pay for performance system.
      It needs a great amount of the government budget to manage the pay for performance system. The system should be worthy of it. Therefore, it is necessary to figure out what factors cause civil servants' reaction against the system and to improve the system.
      This study surveys the lower level civil servants in Gyungsangnamdo to identify how the pay for performance system is managed in Korea. The literature review is also carried out to support the policy theoretically. Based on the findings, this study makes some suggestions for the improvement of the system.
      The issues found in this study are the reward for the performance, the methods to evaluate the performance, the way to pay for the performance, and the negative recognition against the reward based on the performance. For the improvements of the system, the better understanding of the system, the appropriateness of the reward, and the fairness of the evaluation need to be secured. In addition, the system needs to be practiced step by step. To successfully establish the pay for performance system in Korea, the research on the improvements of the policy needs to be studied in the future.
      번역하기

      Nowadays we are living in endless changes due to globalization, information, democratization, and localizaion. To respond these needs, to build up the competition among civil servants, and to promote working atmosphere, the Korean government has been ...

      Nowadays we are living in endless changes due to globalization, information, democratization, and localizaion. To respond these needs, to build up the competition among civil servants, and to promote working atmosphere, the Korean government has been managing pay for performance system.
      In the pay for performance system, workers are paid differently according to their achievements. The purpose of the policy is to realize the principle of equity and to increase the productivity. The monetary reward will promote working atmosphere and create the competition among civil servants in public office community.
      Currently, the Korean government pays annual income based on the performance for the civil servants whose ranks are above the director of a bureau, whereas civil servants ranked below the head of a department are raised differently based on the performance.
      The pay for performance system has been criticized severely since the system applied in 2001. Civil servants reallot their allowances which were paid differently based on the performance evenly to all of them or they return the rewards based on the performance. They are strongly asking to change the pay for performance system.
      It needs a great amount of the government budget to manage the pay for performance system. The system should be worthy of it. Therefore, it is necessary to figure out what factors cause civil servants' reaction against the system and to improve the system.
      This study surveys the lower level civil servants in Gyungsangnamdo to identify how the pay for performance system is managed in Korea. The literature review is also carried out to support the policy theoretically. Based on the findings, this study makes some suggestions for the improvement of the system.
      The issues found in this study are the reward for the performance, the methods to evaluate the performance, the way to pay for the performance, and the negative recognition against the reward based on the performance. For the improvements of the system, the better understanding of the system, the appropriateness of the reward, and the fairness of the evaluation need to be secured. In addition, the system needs to be practiced step by step. To successfully establish the pay for performance system in Korea, the research on the improvements of the policy needs to be studied in the future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 연구목적 = 1
      • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 = 3
      • 1. 연구의 범위 = 3
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 연구목적 = 1
      • 제2절 연구범위와 방법 = 3
      • 1. 연구의 범위 = 3
      • 2. 연구의 방법 = 4
      • 제2장 성과급에 대한 이론적 배경 = 6
      • 제1절 성과급의 개념과 의의 = 6
      • 1. 성과급제도의 의의 = 6
      • 2. 인센티브제도 = 9
      • 제2절 성과급의 기본요건 = 13
      • 1. 동기유발의 효과성 = 13
      • 2. 성과보상의 적정성 = 15
      • 3. 성과평가의 공정성 = 16
      • 제3절 성과급의 종류 = 18
      • 1. 개인 성과급 = 19
      • 2. 집단 성과급 = 20
      • 제4절 외국의 공무원 성과급제도 = 22
      • 1. 영국 정부의 성과급제도 = 22
      • 2. 미국정부의 성과급제도 = 23
      • 3. 뉴질랜드 정부의 성과급제도 = 25
      • 4. 캐나다 정부의 성과급제도 = 26
      • 5. 싱가포르 정부의 성과급제도 = 28
      • 6. 외국정부와 우리나라정부의 성과급제도 비교 = 30
      • 제3장 우리나라 공무원의 성과급제도 = 33
      • 제1절 우리나라 공무원 성과급제도 = 33
      • 1. 우리나라 공무원 성과급제도의 추진배경과 경과 = 33
      • 2. 특별상여수당 = 36
      • 3. 성과연봉제 = 37
      • 4. 성과상여금 = 39
      • 제2절 우리나라 공무원의 성과급제도 운영 실태 = 41
      • 1. 성과연봉제의 운영실태 = 41
      • 2. 성과상여금제의 운영 실태 = 41
      • 제4장 성과급제도에 대한 경상남도 지방공무원 인식조사 = 43
      • 제1절 조사설계 = 43
      • 제2절 설문조사 = 44
      • 1. 설문지구성과 조사방법 = 44
      • 2. 자료수집과 통계처리 = 46
      • 3. 표본자료의 특성 = 47
      • 제3절 조사결과 분석 = 49
      • 1. 성과급제도에 대한 인지도 = 49
      • 2. 제도적인 측면 = 50
      • 3. 운영적인 측면 = 63
      • 4. 동기유발의 효과평가 = 68
      • 제5장 성과급제도의 문제점과 발전방안 = 73
      • 제1절 공무원 성과급제도의 문제점 = 73
      • 1. 제도적인 측면에서의 문제점 = 73
      • 2. 운영적인 측면에서의 문제점 = 75
      • 제2절 공무원 성과급제도의 발전방안 = 78
      • 1. 제도적인 측면에서의 발전방안 = 78
      • 2. 운영적인 측면에서의 발전방안 = 81
      • 제6장 결론 = 84
      • 참고문헌 = 89
      • ABSTRACT = 91
      • 설문지 = 94
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼