RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동북아 도시의 성장전략과 거버넌스 비교연구:부산·오사카·상하이를 중심으로 = Urban Growth and Governance of Northeast Asian Cities : A Comparative Study of Busan, Osaka, and Shanghai

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103963946

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to produce a primary reference for the classification of modes of urban governance by comparatively illustrating three major East Asian port cities(Busan, Osaka, and Shanghai). These three cities have shared similar experience of crisis in urban growth during the 1990s, and tried to revive their economy through carrying a series of urban innovation and restructuring the mode of urban governance. This study examines different features of urban governance among those three cities by comparing how each city struggled to overcome its economic crisis.
      Our analysis reveals some notable features of each city. In case of Busan, it gradually institutionalizes the cooperative relationship between public and private sector and intergovernmental relationship as well in response to the central government policy of balanced national development. Concentration on strategic industries and emphasis on partnership with civil sector in the process of policy formation are the new scenes in Busan during recent years. But it seems that the cooperative culture has not settled down yet in Busan. Osaka seems to have developed a more full-fledged structure of urban governance through bottom-up process of policy formation. More vivid interaction among different urban actors, bottom-up process, and regional cooperation in wide area are noted in Osaka. In case of Shanghai, local government is found as the powerful engine to pursue urban development. Features of managerial governance and "growth coalition" between government-business sector stand out. Namely, Shanghai may be marked as a closed system of urban governance which is led by top-down process.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to produce a primary reference for the classification of modes of urban governance by comparatively illustrating three major East Asian port cities(Busan, Osaka, and Shanghai). These three cities have shared similar experi...

      The purpose of this study is to produce a primary reference for the classification of modes of urban governance by comparatively illustrating three major East Asian port cities(Busan, Osaka, and Shanghai). These three cities have shared similar experience of crisis in urban growth during the 1990s, and tried to revive their economy through carrying a series of urban innovation and restructuring the mode of urban governance. This study examines different features of urban governance among those three cities by comparing how each city struggled to overcome its economic crisis.
      Our analysis reveals some notable features of each city. In case of Busan, it gradually institutionalizes the cooperative relationship between public and private sector and intergovernmental relationship as well in response to the central government policy of balanced national development. Concentration on strategic industries and emphasis on partnership with civil sector in the process of policy formation are the new scenes in Busan during recent years. But it seems that the cooperative culture has not settled down yet in Busan. Osaka seems to have developed a more full-fledged structure of urban governance through bottom-up process of policy formation. More vivid interaction among different urban actors, bottom-up process, and regional cooperation in wide area are noted in Osaka. In case of Shanghai, local government is found as the powerful engine to pursue urban development. Features of managerial governance and "growth coalition" between government-business sector stand out. Namely, Shanghai may be marked as a closed system of urban governance which is led by top-down process.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "지방자치와 권력구조" 나남출판 2000

      2 "제1차 지역혁신발전 5개년계획" 2004

      3 "시장체제하의 중국의 도시통치와 민주화 上海市의 사례" 41 (41): 2001

      4 "부산지역 산업클러스터 진흥방안" 부산광역시 경제진흥국 2003

      5 "부산발전 2020비전과 전략" 부산발전연구원 2005

      6 "부산광역시정부의 정책결정 과정과 구조" (창간) : 99-119, 1997

      7 "로컬거버넌스의 국제적 이해와 부산의 현황과 과제" 2003

      8 "로컬거버넌스(Local Governance) 형성의 영향요인에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 2006

      9 "關西活性化白書: 都市再生からみた關西經濟の活性化" 2002

      10 "關西再生への選擇: サステイナブル社会と自治の展望" 2004

      1 "지방자치와 권력구조" 나남출판 2000

      2 "제1차 지역혁신발전 5개년계획" 2004

      3 "시장체제하의 중국의 도시통치와 민주화 上海市의 사례" 41 (41): 2001

      4 "부산지역 산업클러스터 진흥방안" 부산광역시 경제진흥국 2003

      5 "부산발전 2020비전과 전략" 부산발전연구원 2005

      6 "부산광역시정부의 정책결정 과정과 구조" (창간) : 99-119, 1997

      7 "로컬거버넌스의 국제적 이해와 부산의 현황과 과제" 2003

      8 "로컬거버넌스(Local Governance) 형성의 영향요인에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 2006

      9 "關西活性化白書: 都市再生からみた關西經濟の活性化" 2002

      10 "關西再生への選擇: サステイナブル社会と自治の展望" 2004

      11 "関西活性化白書: クール関西をめざして―関西の魅力再発見・再構築―" 2004

      12 "近畿經濟産業政策のあり方" 2001

      13 "跨国公司在上海" 2004

      14 "總合計劃21推進のための新指針: 施策方針(ガイドランイン)編" 2001a

      15 "縣民經濟計算年報" 2004

      16 "抢滩上海 跨国公司地区总部迁泸" 2002

      17 "大阪灣臨海地域開發整備法ハンドブック" 2003

      18 "大阪市都市再生プログラム" 2003

      19 "大阪市市民公益活動推進指針" 2001b

      20 "大都市圈再編への構想" 東京大學出版會 2002

      21 "地方の政治行政のおける政策決定実現プロセス" 硏究報告書 2003

      22 "地域社會と經濟の再生" 新日本出版社 2004

      23 "包括的地方自治ガバンナンス改革" 東洋經濟新報社 2003

      24 "中国分省市场化指数-各地区市场化相对进程报告(2001)" 经济科学出版社 2003

      25 "上海经济年鉴" 上海三联书店 1996

      26 "上海改革开放二十年: 工业卷" 上海人民出版社 1998

      27 "アジア都市政府の比較硏究" 九州大學出版會 1999

      28 "“关于开发浦东的两个报告" 22-26, 1990

      29 "“Neighborhoods and Public-Private Partnership in Pittsburgh" 217-249, 1990

      30 "“A Public-Private Support Systems for Community-Based Organizations in Pittsburgh ” Journal of the American Planning Association" 459-468, 1987

      31 "Urban Physical Development in Transition to Market The Case of China as a Transitional Economy" 36 (36): 178-196, 2000

      32 "Urban Governance in the Post-Fordist City" John Wiley and Sons 1995

      33 "Urban Development and a Socialist Pro-growth Coalition in Shanghai" 37 (37): 475-499, 2002

      34 Chan, Roger C. K, "Urban Development and Redevelopment" The Chinese University Press 1996

      35 "University of Chicago Press" 1981

      36 "University Press of Kansas" 19891946-1988

      37 "The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives Two Decades Later" State University of New York Press 1999

      38 "The Rise of the Network Society" Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2000

      39 "The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China 중국 경제 개혁의 정치적 논리" 경남대학교 출판부 1999

      40 "The Global City: New York, London, and Tokyo" Princeton University Press 2001

      41 "The Entrepreneurial City" Chichester. 1998

      42 "The Dirty Little Secret of World Cities Research Data Problems in Comparative Analysis" 20 : 697-717, 1996

      43 "The Changing Industrial and Spatial Structure in Shanghai" 16 (16): 577-594, 1995

      44 "The (Post-) Socialist Entrepreneurial City as a State Project: Shanghai's Reglobalisation in Question" 40 (40): 1673-1698, 2003

      45 "Territorial Reviews" OECD 2004

      46 "Shanghai: An alternative centre?" Routledge 1997

      47 "Shanghai and Hong Kong as International Financial Centers: Historical Perspective and Contemporary Analysis" HIEBS (1071) : 2003

      48 "Pudong: Remaking Shanghai as a World City" The Chinese University Press 1996

      49 "New York and London in the Contemporary World" 1992

      50 "Models of Urban Governance The Institutional Dimension of Urban Politics" 34 (34): 372-396, 1999

      51 Goodwin, M., "Local Governance: the Crises of Fordism and the Changing Geographies of Regulation" 21 : 635-648, 1996

      52 "Leadership Change in Shanghai Toward the Dominance of Party Technocrats" 38 (38): 1998

      53 "Journal of Theoretical Politics" 243-257, 1991

      54 "Government and Politics" Oxford University Press 1998

      55 "Governance of Complexity and the Complexity of Governance preliminary remarks on some problems and limits of economic guidance" Edward Elgar 1997

      56 "Economic Development in Shanghai and the Role of the State" 40 (40): 1549-1572, 2003

      57 "East Asian Urbanization: Patterns, Problems, and Prospects" Asia/Pacific Research Center 1998

      58 "Comparative Urban Governance: An Integrated Approach" 38 (38): 356-395, 2003

      59 "City and Regime in the American Republic University of Chicago Press" 1987

      60 "Cities in the International Marketplace The Political Economy of Urban Development in North America and Western Europe" Princeton University Press 2002

      61 "Bargaining with Transitional Corporation The Case of Shanghai" 23-3, 1999

      62 "21C 동북아시대의 해양수도를 위한 부산의 비전과 발전전략" 부산광역시 2003

      63 "21C 동북아 물류중심도시 실현을 위한 부산의 항만물류산업 육성 전략" (3) : 2005

      64 "2004跨国公司在中国报告" 中国经济出版社 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼