The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in prev...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104529637
Jörg Plassen (Ruhr-Universität)
2016
English
KCI등재,ESCI
학술저널
55-74(20쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in prev...
The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in previousresearch, the text contains important information on the history of San-lun 三論thought of the Southern Dynasties not available from other sources. In particular, acomparison with works ascribed to his fellow student Chi-tsang 吉藏 (547–623) allowsto reconstruct important facets of Fa-lang’s 法朗 (507–581) thought and practice.
Some hitherto rather neglected passages in the “Ch’ojang chungga ŭi” section,preserved in a manuscript first introduced by Ōchō Enichi 横超慧日 in 1959, containinteresting explanations of the ch’ojang 初章 (“First stanza”) formula. These explanationsnot only give detailed information on the origin and meaning of the ch’ojang formulain the San-lun (Kor. Samnon) 三論 context (as shown by Ōchō Enichi and Itō Takatoshi伊藤隆壽), but also an important clue for the reconstruction of Wŏnhyo’s 元曉 (617–686)understanding of the term ch’ojang. Focusing on the character “a” (a cha 阿字), theyalso appear to have exerted some influence on the notion of the t’olonimen (Kor. taranimun) 陀羅尼門 (dhāraṇī gate), which Chih-yen 智儼 (602–668) and, with even moreemphasis, Ŭisang 義湘 (625–702) and his followers consider the fundamental approachunderlying the Hua-yen ching 華嚴經.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 平井俊榮, "中国般若思想史研究" Shunjūsha 1976
2 石井公成, "三論教学の研究" Shunjūsha 1990
3 조르그 플라센, "Some remarks on the significance of the Taesung saron hyonui ki 大乗四論玄義記 for the reconstruction of Fa-lang's 法朗(507-581) thought" 불교문화연구소 (5) : 117-143, 2009
4 Ōchō, Enichi, "Shinshutsu Siron gengi no Shoshō chūge gi 新出四論玄義の初章中假義" 7 : 1959
5 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (ka) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (下)" 34 : 1976
6 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (jō) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (上)" 32 : 1974
7 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (chū) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (中)" 33 : 1975
8 Jörg Plassen, "On the significance of the Daeseung saron hyeonui gi 大乘四論玄義記 for research on early Korean Buddhist thought―Some initial observations focusing on hwajaeng―" 한국사연구회 (136) : 29-56, 2007
9 石井公成, "Gangyō to Chūgoku shisō" 31 (31): 1983
10 Plassen, Jörg, "Die Spuren der Abhandlung (Lun-chi) — Exegese und Übung im San-lun des sechsten Jahrhunderts. [The Traces of the Treatise (Lun-chi): Exegesis and Practice in 6th Century San-lun]" University of Hamburg 2002
1 平井俊榮, "中国般若思想史研究" Shunjūsha 1976
2 石井公成, "三論教学の研究" Shunjūsha 1990
3 조르그 플라센, "Some remarks on the significance of the Taesung saron hyonui ki 大乗四論玄義記 for the reconstruction of Fa-lang's 法朗(507-581) thought" 불교문화연구소 (5) : 117-143, 2009
4 Ōchō, Enichi, "Shinshutsu Siron gengi no Shoshō chūge gi 新出四論玄義の初章中假義" 7 : 1959
5 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (ka) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (下)" 34 : 1976
6 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (jō) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (上)" 32 : 1974
7 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (chū) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (中)" 33 : 1975
8 Jörg Plassen, "On the significance of the Daeseung saron hyeonui gi 大乘四論玄義記 for research on early Korean Buddhist thought―Some initial observations focusing on hwajaeng―" 한국사연구회 (136) : 29-56, 2007
9 石井公成, "Gangyō to Chūgoku shisō" 31 (31): 1983
10 Plassen, Jörg, "Die Spuren der Abhandlung (Lun-chi) — Exegese und Übung im San-lun des sechsten Jahrhunderts. [The Traces of the Treatise (Lun-chi): Exegesis and Practice in 6th Century San-lun]" University of Hamburg 2002
A Contemporary Application of Buddhist Worldview for Understanding and Transforming Sentient Beings
A Study on the Debate between Buddhists and Confucians in China’s Six Dynasties Period
The State of the Field in the Study of Japanese Buddhism and Remaining Problems
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.08 | 0.06 | 0.384 | 0.06 |