RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Some Further Reflections on Hyegyun’s Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki and Its Place within East Asian Buddhism: A Note on the Explanations of the ‘Ch’ojang’ Formula, and Their Possible Implications

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104529637

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in previousresearch, the text contains important information on the history of San-lun 三論thought of the Southern Dynasties not available from other sources. In particular, acomparison with works ascribed to his fellow student Chi-tsang 吉藏 (547–623) allowsto reconstruct important facets of Fa-lang’s 法朗 (507–581) thought and practice.
      Some hitherto rather neglected passages in the “Ch’ojang chungga ŭi” section,preserved in a manuscript first introduced by Ōchō Enichi 横超慧日 in 1959, containinteresting explanations of the ch’ojang 初章 (“First stanza”) formula. These explanationsnot only give detailed information on the origin and meaning of the ch’ojang formulain the San-lun (Kor. Samnon) 三論 context (as shown by Ōchō Enichi and Itō Takatoshi伊藤隆壽), but also an important clue for the reconstruction of Wŏnhyo’s 元曉 (617–686)understanding of the term ch’ojang. Focusing on the character “a” (a cha 阿字), theyalso appear to have exerted some influence on the notion of the t’olonimen (Kor. taranimun) 陀羅尼門 (dhāraṇī gate), which Chih-yen 智儼 (602–668) and, with even moreemphasis, Ŭisang 義湘 (625–702) and his followers consider the fundamental approachunderlying the Hua-yen ching 華嚴經.
      번역하기

      The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in prev...

      The Taesŭng saron hyŏnŭi ki 大乘四論玄義記, authored by the [Sŭng] jŏng(“Superintendent”) Hyegyun 僧正慧均 (n.d.) from Paekche, is of crucial importance forthe understanding of medieval East Asian Buddhist thought. As shown in previousresearch, the text contains important information on the history of San-lun 三論thought of the Southern Dynasties not available from other sources. In particular, acomparison with works ascribed to his fellow student Chi-tsang 吉藏 (547–623) allowsto reconstruct important facets of Fa-lang’s 法朗 (507–581) thought and practice.
      Some hitherto rather neglected passages in the “Ch’ojang chungga ŭi” section,preserved in a manuscript first introduced by Ōchō Enichi 横超慧日 in 1959, containinteresting explanations of the ch’ojang 初章 (“First stanza”) formula. These explanationsnot only give detailed information on the origin and meaning of the ch’ojang formulain the San-lun (Kor. Samnon) 三論 context (as shown by Ōchō Enichi and Itō Takatoshi伊藤隆壽), but also an important clue for the reconstruction of Wŏnhyo’s 元曉 (617–686)understanding of the term ch’ojang. Focusing on the character “a” (a cha 阿字), theyalso appear to have exerted some influence on the notion of the t’olonimen (Kor. taranimun) 陀羅尼門 (dhāraṇī gate), which Chih-yen 智儼 (602–668) and, with even moreemphasis, Ŭisang 義湘 (625–702) and his followers consider the fundamental approachunderlying the Hua-yen ching 華嚴經.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 平井俊榮, "中国般若思想史研究" Shunjūsha 1976

      2 石井公成, "三論教学の研究" Shunjūsha 1990

      3 조르그 플라센, "Some remarks on the significance of the Taesung saron hyonui ki 大乗四論玄義記 for the reconstruction of Fa-lang's 法朗(507-581) thought" 불교문화연구소 (5) : 117-143, 2009

      4 Ōchō, Enichi, "Shinshutsu Siron gengi no Shoshō chūge gi 新出四論玄義の初章中假義" 7 : 1959

      5 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (ka) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (下)" 34 : 1976

      6 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (jō) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (上)" 32 : 1974

      7 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (chū) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (中)" 33 : 1975

      8 Jörg Plassen, "On the significance of the Daeseung saron hyeonui gi 大乘四論玄義記 for research on early Korean Buddhist thought―Some initial observations focusing on hwajaeng―" 한국사연구회 (136) : 29-56, 2007

      9 石井公成, "Gangyō to Chūgoku shisō" 31 (31): 1983

      10 Plassen, Jörg, "Die Spuren der Abhandlung (Lun-chi) — Exegese und Übung im San-lun des sechsten Jahrhunderts. [The Traces of the Treatise (Lun-chi): Exegesis and Practice in 6th Century San-lun]" University of Hamburg 2002

      1 平井俊榮, "中国般若思想史研究" Shunjūsha 1976

      2 石井公成, "三論教学の研究" Shunjūsha 1990

      3 조르그 플라센, "Some remarks on the significance of the Taesung saron hyonui ki 大乗四論玄義記 for the reconstruction of Fa-lang's 法朗(507-581) thought" 불교문화연구소 (5) : 117-143, 2009

      4 Ōchō, Enichi, "Shinshutsu Siron gengi no Shoshō chūge gi 新出四論玄義の初章中假義" 7 : 1959

      5 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (ka) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (下)" 34 : 1976

      6 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (jō) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (上)" 32 : 1974

      7 Itō, Takatoshi, "Sanron kyōgaku ni okeru Shōshō chūge gi (chū) 三論教学における 初章中假義 (中)" 33 : 1975

      8 Jörg Plassen, "On the significance of the Daeseung saron hyeonui gi 大乘四論玄義記 for research on early Korean Buddhist thought―Some initial observations focusing on hwajaeng―" 한국사연구회 (136) : 29-56, 2007

      9 石井公成, "Gangyō to Chūgoku shisō" 31 (31): 1983

      10 Plassen, Jörg, "Die Spuren der Abhandlung (Lun-chi) — Exegese und Übung im San-lun des sechsten Jahrhunderts. [The Traces of the Treatise (Lun-chi): Exegesis and Practice in 6th Century San-lun]" University of Hamburg 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.11
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.08 0.06 0.384 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼