RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      생태·자연도 이의신청지역의 원인 분석 = The Analysis on Causes of Areas with Public Appeals to the Ecosystem and Nature Map

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The objective of this study is to seek for improvement measures to make the Ecosystem and Nature Map by analyzing causes for grade changes and distributional characteristics of areas with public objections to the Ecosystem and Nature Map notified by e...

      The objective of this study is to seek for improvement measures to make the Ecosystem and NatureMap by analyzing causes for grade changes and distributional characteristics of areas with publicobjections to the Ecosystem and Nature Map notified by e-official gazette from 2014 to June 2016.The receipt of public appeals has been recently increased from average 23 cases a year(2007-2013)to average 33 cases a year(2014-June 2016) while there were 42 areas with public appeals for lessthan the minimum area(62,500㎡) for the evaluation of grade of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Mostof the public appeals focused on the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Before gradechanges by public appeals, the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map were 76.0% of thewhole areas with public appeals. However, after grade changes by public appeals, it was rapidlydecreased to 25.2%, which means that a lot of the 1st grade zone with public appeals were lowered.In the results of analyzing the distributional characteristics of areas with public appeals, they were

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The objective of this study is to seek for improvement measures to make the Ecosystem and Nature Map by analyzing causes for grade changes and distributional characteristics of areas with public objections to the Ecosystem and Nature Map notified by e...

      The objective of this study is to seek for improvement measures to make the Ecosystem and Nature Map by analyzing causes for grade changes and distributional characteristics of areas with public objections to the Ecosystem and Nature Map notified by e-official gazette from 2014 to June 2016. The receipt of public appeals has been recently increased from average 23 cases a year(2007-2013) to average 33 cases a year(2014-June 2016) while there were 42 areas with public appeals for less than the minimum area(62,500㎡) for the evaluation of grade of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Most of the public appeals focused on the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map. Before grade changes by public appeals, the 1st grade zone of the Ecosystem and Nature Map were 76.0% of the whole areas with public appeals. However, after grade changes by public appeals, it was rapidly decreased to 25.2%, which means that a lot of the 1st grade zone with public appeals were lowered. In the results of analyzing the distributional characteristics of areas with public appeals, they were mostly distributed in lowland(less than 250m altitude), section with 10~20° slope, and areas close to or within 100m from built-up area. Regarding areas with public appeals, the biggest time difference between the period of the existing research by National Ecosystem Survey and the period of notice after completing the treatment of public appeals was 18 years while areas showing 6-15 years of time difference were about 70%. Thus, there were huge differences in time of research and notice. Also, the biggest causes for grade changes were boundary errors caused by small-scale survey, and then followed by changes in evaluation of endangered species and occurrence of built-up area and damaged land. Analyzing areas with public appeals in each evaluation item of the Ecosystem and Nature Map, vegetation part was 73.0%, and endangered species area was 23.1% while topography and wetland was less.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김지석, "시가화지역 식물군집 특성에 기초한 비오톱 유형분류" 한국환경생태학회 29 (29): 454-461, 2015

      2 신영철, "생태자연도 1등급지의 경제적 가치 추정" 한국환경경제학회 14 (14): 25-50, 2005

      3 안경환, "생태·자연도의 관·민원 현황에 대한 고찰" 한국환경영향평가학회 24 (24): 99-109, 2015

      4 이종수, "국토환경지리정보 고도화 전략 연구-국토환경성평가지도, 생태자연도, 토지피복지도를 중심으로-" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 6 (6): 97-122, 2007

      5 Hudson, G. Donald, "The Unit area method of land classification" 26 (26): 99-112, 1936

      6 Lee KS, "The Gradient Analysis of the Korean Peninsula by using DEM" 3 (3): 35-43, 2000

      7 National Institute of Ecology, "Guideline of 2015 National Ecosystem Survey" National Institute of Ecology 2015

      8 Ministry of Environment, "General Plan for Conservation of Natural Environment (2016-2025)" 2015

      9 Choung HL, "Development Plan of Mapping of Actual Vegetation for Improving the Accuracy of the Ecosystem and Nature Map" 12 (12): 1-8, 2008

      10 Ministry of Environment, "Application of Vegetation Class in Use of the Ecosystem and Nature Map" 2004

      1 김지석, "시가화지역 식물군집 특성에 기초한 비오톱 유형분류" 한국환경생태학회 29 (29): 454-461, 2015

      2 신영철, "생태자연도 1등급지의 경제적 가치 추정" 한국환경경제학회 14 (14): 25-50, 2005

      3 안경환, "생태·자연도의 관·민원 현황에 대한 고찰" 한국환경영향평가학회 24 (24): 99-109, 2015

      4 이종수, "국토환경지리정보 고도화 전략 연구-국토환경성평가지도, 생태자연도, 토지피복지도를 중심으로-" 한국환경정책·평가연구원 6 (6): 97-122, 2007

      5 Hudson, G. Donald, "The Unit area method of land classification" 26 (26): 99-112, 1936

      6 Lee KS, "The Gradient Analysis of the Korean Peninsula by using DEM" 3 (3): 35-43, 2000

      7 National Institute of Ecology, "Guideline of 2015 National Ecosystem Survey" National Institute of Ecology 2015

      8 Ministry of Environment, "General Plan for Conservation of Natural Environment (2016-2025)" 2015

      9 Choung HL, "Development Plan of Mapping of Actual Vegetation for Improving the Accuracy of the Ecosystem and Nature Map" 12 (12): 1-8, 2008

      10 Ministry of Environment, "Application of Vegetation Class in Use of the Ecosystem and Nature Map" 2004

      11 Jeon SW, "A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(Ⅲ): Focusing on Mapping of Wetland Classification Around River" Korea Environment Institute 2000

      12 Jeon SW, "A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(Ⅲ)" Korea Environment Institute 2001

      13 Jeon SW, "A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(Ⅱ)" Korea Environment Institute 1999

      14 Jeon SW, "A Study on Remote Sensing Technique for Mapping of the Ecosystem and Nature Map(Ⅰ)" Korea Environment Institute 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-06-09 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국환경복원녹화기술학회 -> 한국환경복원기술학회
      영문명 : The Korea Society For Environmental Restoration And Revegetation Technology -> The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-03-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 -> 한국환경복원기술학회지
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology -> Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.39
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.41 0.42 0.458 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼