霞谷『大學說』의 經學史的의미

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper reviews Hagok Jeong Je-du's(1649~1736) Daehakseol(the thoughts of Great Learning) and the historical meaning of Confucian classics. As one of the leading scholars during the Joseon Dynasty Jeong Je-du elicited a new trend called the'philosophy of Wang Yang-ming' from an academic atmosphere focused only on the philosophy of Zhu Xi. His position in Joseon Dynasty's history of thought is significant. In previous studies the systematic structure and philosophical concept of Daehakseol were analyzed. However researches on their influential relationships inside the Joseon Dynasty were insufficiently made. Thus this paper aims to reveal the changing trend of ideas which influenced each other during the 17th and 18th century.
When analyzing Daxue(the Great learning) Jeong Je-du considered Daxue in the ancient version as the canon and organized his analysis into six chapters. Chapter 1 was the Chapter of'Correcting the wrong things in the out of mind' and'Extension of the innate good nature,' which included details on the three principles the eight items,'Abiding in the highest good' and'Extension of the innate good nature'. Chapter 2 was the Chapter of'Sincerity of willing' which included details on manifesting illustrious virtue loving people and abiding in the highest good. Chapter 3 4 5 and 6 was each the Chapter of'Rectification of mind' &'Cultivation of person','Cultivation of person' &'Regulation of family','Regulation of family' &'Ordering of state' and'Ordering of state' &'Peace throughout the world.' Especially Jeong Je-du's analysis was unique as it considered Chapter 1 of Daxueas the Chapter of'Correcting the wrong things in the out of mind' and'Extension of the innate good nature' placing the two elements as the key of Daxue.
Jeong Je-du criticized'Theory of fell the chapter 5','Theory of wrong letters','Theory of upside down for bamboo slips' emphasized by Zhu Xi at Daxue in the modern version. Instead he grasped Daxue based on its ancient version. Most of the meanings and theories claimed in Daehakseol are based on the viewpoint of the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming. However some parts were influenced by the theories of Yun Hue and Park Se-Dang who had the stand of anti philosophy of Zhu Xi. Through the argument inside Soron (Young doctrine faction) he seemed to have made his opinion more precise and then wrote Daehakseol.
Although Jeong Je-du's analysis of Daxue didn't have great social influence on the latter part of the Joseon Dynasty it helped people inside Soron better understand the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming and gave an opportunity of a theoretical basis through a Zhu Xi-style analysis. Jeong Je-du's idea later connects with Ganghwa School after his death.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 霞谷『大學說』의 체제구성과 大學觀
• Ⅲ. 『大學說』의 經學史的 의미
• Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김교빈, "한국의 사상가 10인-하곡 정제두" 예문서원 350-, 2005

2 금장태, "한국 양명학의 쟁점" 서울대학교출판부 16-21, 2008

3 윤남한, "조선시대의 양명학 연구" 집문당 210-, 1982

4 심경호, "이광사와 이광찬의 왕복서한, in 新編圓嶠李匡師文集" 시간의 물레 425-436, 2005

5 최재목, "양명학의 한국적 변용, in 한국의 사상가 10인-하곡 정제두" 예문서원 82-, 2005

6 陳來, "양명철학" 예문서원 213-217, 2009

7 황지원, "성리학의 개념들" 예문서원 713-720, 2008

8 김교빈, "대학설을 통해 본 하곡 정제두의 경학사상" 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원 1995

9 심경호, "강화학파의 문학과 사상 3권" 한국정신문화연구원 51-71, 1991

10 심경호, "강화학파의 가학(假學) 비판" 한국양명학회 (13) : 245-282, 2005

11 "霞谷集"

12 김용재, "霞谷鄭齊斗의 四書經說硏究" 성균관대학교 2002

13 유철호, "霞谷鄭齊斗의 ‘大學說’에 관한 고찰" 한국양명학회 (5) : 2001

14 최석기, "陽村 權近의 <大學>解釋과 그 意味" 우리한문학회 8 (8): 81-115, 2003

15 "陽明全書"

16 "白湖全書"

17 심경호, "格物致知論, in 강화학파의 문학과 사상 3권" 한국정신문화연구원 51-71, 1991

18 "斗南集"

19 "大學章句"

20 "大學"

21 "傳習錄"