일제 경찰기구의 위생 선전 = Propaganda of Sanitation by Japanese Police Organizations

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

日本の朝鮮統治が30年が過ぎた時点で、30年以上の間に衛生思想の普及のためにいくつかの施策を実施したにもかかわらず、伝染病にかかった患者数と死亡者数は大幅に減らなかった。朝鮮で衛生観念の普及のために帝國主義日本の警察は怖がらせてなだめる｢ニンジンと鞭｣施策を展開した。なだめる施策は、時間と空間を活用した宣伝活動である。特定の時間を設定して集中宣伝する方法は、｢衛生デー｣や｢防疫週間｣などの運営である。一定の空間に大衆を集め宣伝する方法は、各種｢展覧会｣の開催などである。京城で衛生展覧会が初めて開催された1921年末にも、5年前に比べて伝染病患者数は1.7倍程度増加した。患者数は約1500人程度増加した。5年後の1926年には、患者数と死亡者数の両方減少した。その間に1922年から京城と地方の衛生展覧会、1924年の蠅展覧会、そして各地の｢衛生デー｣の設定、運営があった。1926年の伝染病患者数の減少は、これらの活動の影響と言えるかもしれませんが、5年後の1931年までに再び増加傾向があります。1933年防疫展覧会と防疫週間の設定が同時に行われた後、統計を見ると、1936年にも1931年に比べて患者数と死亡者数の両方若干の増加を示す。患者数は約18%、死亡者数は31%増加した。上昇曲線の傾きは1920年代に比べて緩やかだったが、増加は依然として続いていた。コレラは減少効果があった1930年代後半には、衛生デーと防疫週間が設定され、運営されていましたが、1941年の伝染病患者数と死亡者数の両方が増加しました。5年前より各各35%,21%増加した。1942年には1年前より患者数,死亡者数,死亡率ともに若干減少を示した。減少傾向の逆転に最大の貢献をした伝染病は、天然痘だった。代わりに、1942年には発疹チフス患者数と死亡者数が大幅に増えたが、天然痘の統計数値がその増加を相殺した。結核患者関連の統計は着実に増加現象を見せた。入院患者·外来患者·治療延日数の三方1931年比で1939年の統計は、それぞれ3.5倍、4.5倍、2.87倍に激増した。1936年には結核予防週間と1938年の結核予防デー設定運営、1939年の結核予防展覧会はすべて、このような結核患者激増への対応だったとすることができる。しかし、1942年の健民運動週間にもまだ結核撲滅が主な目標であったことから分かるように、結核問題は依然として大きな問題であった。

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

At the time of the Japanese colonial rule over 30 years, the number of patients and deaths from infectious diseases did not decrease significantly even though the Japanese police implemented various measures to spread hygiene ideas for 30 years. In order to spread hygiene ideas in Joseon, Japanese police have implemented a ‘carrot and whip’ policy that threatens and appeases. The soothing measure is propaganda activities that utilize time and space. The way to set up a specific time and promote it intensively is the operation of ‘Hygiene Day’ and ‘Anti-virus Week’. The way to bring the public together in a certain space and promote it is to hold various ‘exhibitions’. At the end of 1921, when the hygiene exhibition was held for the first time in Gyeongseong, the number of infectious disease patients increased by 1.7 times compared to five years ago. Five years later, in 1926, both the number of patients and the number of deaths decreased. In the meantime, there were hygiene exhibitions in Gyeongseong and local areas since 1922, a fly exhibition in 1924, and ‘Hygiene Day’ establishment and operation in various places. The decrease in the number of infectious disease patients in 1926 is the influence of these activities. But five years later, in 1931, it was on the rise again. After the 1933 anti-virus exhibition and the anti-virus week setting were simultaneously performed, statistics showed a slight increase in both the number of patients and the number of deaths compared to 1931 in 1936. The number of patients increased by about 18 percent and the death toll by 31 percent. The slope of the upward curve was gentler than in the 1920s, but the increase remained. However, only cholera had a reduction effect. In the late 1930s, also hygiene day and anti-virus week were established and operated. However, both the number of infectious disease patients and the number of deaths in 1941 did not decline; they increased by 35 percent and 21 percent, respectively, compared to five years ago. In 1942, both the number of patients, the number of deaths and the death rate decreased slightly compared to a year ago. The epidemic that contributed the most to the reversal of the decline was smallpox. Instead, in 1942, the number of typhus patients and deaths increased significantly, but the statistical figures of smallpox offset the increase. The statistics related to tuberculosis patients showed a steady increase. The number of inpatients, outpatients, and treatment days increased 3.5 times, 4.5 times, and 2.87 times, respectively, compared to 1931. In 1936, the Tuberculosis Prevention Week, the 1938 Tuberculosis Prevention Day, and the 1939 Tuberculosis Prevention Exhibition were all responses to the increase of tuberculosis patients. However, as we can see from the fact that tuberculosis eradication was still the main goal in the 1942 campaign week, the tuberculosis problem was still a big problem.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말 Ⅱ. 일정한 공간에 대중을 소집하여 집중 선전 Ⅲ. 특정 시간을 설정하여 집중 선전 Ⅳ. 맺음말에 대신하여: 요약과 평가 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "조선총독관방 총무국 총무과장"

2 유길준, "조선지식인 유길준, 서양을 번역하다 서유견문" 서해문집 2005

3 "조선중앙일보"

4 "조선일보"

5 김진규, "일제 식민지 시기 위생조합 제도의 형성과정－경찰 관변기구화를 중심으로－" 서울대학교 국사학과 66 : 2020

6 마쓰다 토시히코, "일본의 조선 식민지 지배와 경찰" 경인문화사 2021

7 장주선, "일본 전시하의 위생행정과 경찰행정" 한국지방자치연구소 3 (3): 1993

8 신창후, "식민지 조선의 경찰과 민중세계 1894-1919" 선인 2019

9 정근식, "식민지 위생경찰의 형성과 변화, 그리고 유산: 식민지 통치성의 시각에서" 한국사회사학회 (90) : 221-270, 2011

10 "매일신보"

11 "동아일보"

12 박윤재, "韓末·日帝 初 漢城衛生會의 活動과 植民 支配" 서울학연구소 (22) : 67-89, 2004

13 "釜山日報"

14 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1942년판)" 조선총독부 1944

15 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1941년판)" 조선총독부 1943

16 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1939년판)" 조선총독부 1941

17 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1938년판)" 조선총독부 1940

18 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1937년판)" 조선총독부 1939

19 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1936년판)" 조선총독부 1938

20 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1934년판)" 조선총독부 1936

21 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1933년판)" 조선총독부 1935

22 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1932년판)" 조선총독부 1934

23 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1931년판)" 조선총독부 1933

24 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1926년판)" 조선총독부 1928

25 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1921년판)" 조선총독부 1922

26 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1916년판)" 조선총독부 1917

27 조선총독부, "朝鮮總督府統計年報(1911년판)" 조선총독부 1912

28 "朝鮮時報"

29 "朝鮮新聞"

30 조선총독부, "施政三十年史" 조선총독부 1940

31 조선총독부, "『조선』 92호"

32 조선총독부, "『조선』 129호"

33 "『불교』 신제53집"

34 "『동양의약』 제1권 3호"

35 "『警務月報』 제16호(10월분)"

36 "『警務彙報』 7월호(제218호)"

37 "『警務彙報』 11월호(제198호)"

38 "『朝鮮總督府官報』 제470호"

39 "『朝鮮總督府官報』 제3546호"

40 이형식, "1910년대 조선총독부의 위생정책과 조선사회" 일본학연구소 (20) : 5-28, 2012

41 이형식, "1910년대 식민지제국일본의 전염병 방역대책― 조선전염병예방령을 중심으로 ―" 한국일본학회 (92) : 291-307, 2012