RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    L2 Teacher’s Instructional Techniques for Rhetorical Writing Patterns of L2 Learners

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107115324

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study explores the writing of EFL learners with a focus on rhetoric. For this purpose, two groups (experimental group (EG) and controlled group(CG)) of 72 EFL learners (M=34, F=38) are selected and required to write English argumentative compositions on the same topic in two distinct sessions. These tasks are then calculated as suggested in the ESL Compositions Rubrics (Jacobs et. al. 1981) by two professional scorers. The numbers of words per sentence (sentence length), spelling errors, use of rhetorical devices, and number of T-units are counted manually. These results showed that: a) there was a positive correlation (r=0.749 p<0.005) between rhetorical instruction and writing styles, b) texts written by the EG are significantly longer than those by the CG, c) EG texts show more idiosyncratic features in T-units, and d) the number of rhetorical devices used in the EG were higher than those by CG. These results showed that scores, rhetorical patterns, and syntactic complexity of L2 writing were significantly enhanced. Implications for the EFL writing class are also illustrated.
    번역하기

    This study explores the writing of EFL learners with a focus on rhetoric. For this purpose, two groups (experimental group (EG) and controlled group(CG)) of 72 EFL learners (M=34, F=38) are selected and required to write English argumentative composit...

    This study explores the writing of EFL learners with a focus on rhetoric. For this purpose, two groups (experimental group (EG) and controlled group(CG)) of 72 EFL learners (M=34, F=38) are selected and required to write English argumentative compositions on the same topic in two distinct sessions. These tasks are then calculated as suggested in the ESL Compositions Rubrics (Jacobs et. al. 1981) by two professional scorers. The numbers of words per sentence (sentence length), spelling errors, use of rhetorical devices, and number of T-units are counted manually. These results showed that: a) there was a positive correlation (r=0.749 p<0.005) between rhetorical instruction and writing styles, b) texts written by the EG are significantly longer than those by the CG, c) EG texts show more idiosyncratic features in T-units, and d) the number of rhetorical devices used in the EG were higher than those by CG. These results showed that scores, rhetorical patterns, and syntactic complexity of L2 writing were significantly enhanced. Implications for the EFL writing class are also illustrated.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Literature Review
    • 3. The Methods
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Literature Review
    • 3. The Methods
    • 4. Results
    • 5. Conclusion
    • References
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼