RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1740년(영조 16) 이후 영조의 정치 운영 = King Yeongjo's administration in the latter half of his reign

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45007650

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      King Yeongjo is generally known to have concentrated upon the so-called Wanron-Tangpyeong/緩論蕩平 policy based upon the concept of Jojae Bohab/ 調劑保合, Yet that principle was not applied to every situations at every times during the entirety of King Yeongjo's reign. During the latter half period of his reign, King Yeongjo denied the Euiri/의리 concept, at least the version suggested and strongly supported by party politics, and instead reinforced the leadership and authority of the king.
      For that task, King Yeongjo prepared relevant ideologies and also a new political structure. In essence, he argued the public nature of the Euiri concept, and intended to place it under the King's own authority. This pushed(or forced) the Euiri concepts which were previously upheld by the Scholar- officials, who employed devices like the so-called Samun Shibi/斯文是非, into the realm of ptivate discussions, and led to the eventual weakening of the scholar-officials' position inside the government, Such scholar-officials were replaced by the Saeshin/世臣 officials and the general public as the King's political partner, and also the government's aim in general policies.
      King Yeongjo's handling of the political arena', which he showed during the latter half period of his reign, reminds us of the actions of the 15th century Chosun kings, and especially King Saejong. But there is also a definitive difference, King Yeongjo was aiming for a political model which was very similar to that of the dynasty's early years, but the political model he was aiming for was also based on a society functioning upon the activities and authorities of the scholar-officials. In essence, he was trying to establish a new model, merging this two distinct kinds of form together. His goal was to sublate the models inherited by the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, and the result was the Tangpyeong policy which was indeed the terminal state of politics that the Chosun Confucian politics could ever reach.
      번역하기

      King Yeongjo is generally known to have concentrated upon the so-called Wanron-Tangpyeong/緩論蕩平 policy based upon the concept of Jojae Bohab/ 調劑保合, Yet that principle was not applied to every situations at every times during the entiret...

      King Yeongjo is generally known to have concentrated upon the so-called Wanron-Tangpyeong/緩論蕩平 policy based upon the concept of Jojae Bohab/ 調劑保合, Yet that principle was not applied to every situations at every times during the entirety of King Yeongjo's reign. During the latter half period of his reign, King Yeongjo denied the Euiri/의리 concept, at least the version suggested and strongly supported by party politics, and instead reinforced the leadership and authority of the king.
      For that task, King Yeongjo prepared relevant ideologies and also a new political structure. In essence, he argued the public nature of the Euiri concept, and intended to place it under the King's own authority. This pushed(or forced) the Euiri concepts which were previously upheld by the Scholar- officials, who employed devices like the so-called Samun Shibi/斯文是非, into the realm of ptivate discussions, and led to the eventual weakening of the scholar-officials' position inside the government, Such scholar-officials were replaced by the Saeshin/世臣 officials and the general public as the King's political partner, and also the government's aim in general policies.
      King Yeongjo's handling of the political arena', which he showed during the latter half period of his reign, reminds us of the actions of the 15th century Chosun kings, and especially King Saejong. But there is also a definitive difference, King Yeongjo was aiming for a political model which was very similar to that of the dynasty's early years, but the political model he was aiming for was also based on a society functioning upon the activities and authorities of the scholar-officials. In essence, he was trying to establish a new model, merging this two distinct kinds of form together. His goal was to sublate the models inherited by the 15th, 16th and 17th centuries, and the result was the Tangpyeong policy which was indeed the terminal state of politics that the Chosun Confucian politics could ever reach.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 머리말
      • 1. 군주권의 위상 강화
      • 1) 왕위 계승의 정통성 강조
      • 2) 사대부 의리의 부정과 군부일체론(君父一體論)
      • 2. 세신(世臣)ㆍ민에 대한 강조와 국가 제도의 정비
      • 머리말
      • 1. 군주권의 위상 강화
      • 1) 왕위 계승의 정통성 강조
      • 2) 사대부 의리의 부정과 군부일체론(君父一體論)
      • 2. 세신(世臣)ㆍ민에 대한 강조와 국가 제도의 정비
      • 1) 세신과의 협력과 위민의 강조
      • 2) 기강 수립과 국가 제도 정비
      • 맺음말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
      KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼