RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한계신용등급 건설회사의 PF대출 신용위험에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Credit Risk of Project Finance Loans Backed by Non-Investment Grade Construction Companies` Guarantees

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82668258

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the credit risk factors of the real estate project finance loans(REPFLs) backed by non-investment grade construction companies` guarantees and compare the result with those of previous studies on REPFLs thus seek any missing credit risk factors in literature. Research data come from the listed REPFLs in 4 major commercial banks at the end of May, 2009. From the raw, our study screened 275 loans guaranteed by the non-investment grade construction companies with the credit ratings of BBB- and lower. The analytical results from Model 1, concerning the ex-ante project information before the first draw-down, show that interest rates on the signing dates, a proxy variable measuring the capital market condition, and construction firms` credit ratings are the most significant credit risk factors. REPFLs for residential complex development seem more riskier than those for other use ones: the study reasoned that it is all because of higher leverage ratios for the former. Also, we find that the loan guarantees by these risky companies are less credible to hedge the credit risk of REPFLS than those by the investment-grade corporations. Through Model 2, regarding the ex-post loan information after the first drawdown, the delay of project schedule, the rapid and severe financial unstability of construction firms and borrowers` breach of loan agreement are the main factors to threat the loan safety. We suggest that developers` more equity contribution on project as well as lenders` more careful corporate analysis on construction firms with efficient force maseure in the event of default are very beneficial ways to hedge the credit risk of REPFLs in the domestic financing system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the credit risk factors of the real estate project finance loans(REPFLs) backed by non-investment grade construction companies` guarantees and compare the result with those of previous studies on REPFLs thus see...

    The purpose of this study is to analyze the credit risk factors of the real estate project finance loans(REPFLs) backed by non-investment grade construction companies` guarantees and compare the result with those of previous studies on REPFLs thus seek any missing credit risk factors in literature. Research data come from the listed REPFLs in 4 major commercial banks at the end of May, 2009. From the raw, our study screened 275 loans guaranteed by the non-investment grade construction companies with the credit ratings of BBB- and lower. The analytical results from Model 1, concerning the ex-ante project information before the first draw-down, show that interest rates on the signing dates, a proxy variable measuring the capital market condition, and construction firms` credit ratings are the most significant credit risk factors. REPFLs for residential complex development seem more riskier than those for other use ones: the study reasoned that it is all because of higher leverage ratios for the former. Also, we find that the loan guarantees by these risky companies are less credible to hedge the credit risk of REPFLS than those by the investment-grade corporations. Through Model 2, regarding the ex-post loan information after the first drawdown, the delay of project schedule, the rapid and severe financial unstability of construction firms and borrowers` breach of loan agreement are the main factors to threat the loan safety. We suggest that developers` more equity contribution on project as well as lenders` more careful corporate analysis on construction firms with efficient force maseure in the event of default are very beneficial ways to hedge the credit risk of REPFLs in the domestic financing system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김진, "주택PF사업에서 분양성과 현금흐름이 대출신용위험에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 45 (45): 129-148, 2010

    2 손진수, "부동산개발론" 부동산114(주) 2006

    3 강태욱, "부동산 프로젝트파이낸싱 대출기관별 특성 분석" 국토연구원 58 : 151-165, 2008

    4 정대석, "부동산 프로젝트금융 적용 사업에 대한 사업성 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 175-188, 2004

    5 박원석, "부동산 개발사업에서 프로젝트 금융의 활용 특성과 대출조건 영향 요인 분석" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 229-243, 2005

    6 김 진, "부동산 PF(Project Finance)대출의 부실화 요인에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 44 (44): 175-191, 2009

    7 이한득, "국내 은행의 건전성평가와 시사점" LGERI 19-37, 2008

    8 고성수, "건설사 우발채무의 측정과 기업가치에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 59 : 189-202, 2008

    9 Angoua, P, "Project Risk Choices under Privately Guaranteed Debt Financing" 48 (48): 123-152, 2008

    10 Shah, S, "Optimal Capital Structure and Project Financing" 42 : 209-243, 1987

    1 김진, "주택PF사업에서 분양성과 현금흐름이 대출신용위험에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 45 (45): 129-148, 2010

    2 손진수, "부동산개발론" 부동산114(주) 2006

    3 강태욱, "부동산 프로젝트파이낸싱 대출기관별 특성 분석" 국토연구원 58 : 151-165, 2008

    4 정대석, "부동산 프로젝트금융 적용 사업에 대한 사업성 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 39 (39): 175-188, 2004

    5 박원석, "부동산 개발사업에서 프로젝트 금융의 활용 특성과 대출조건 영향 요인 분석" 대한국토·도시계획학회 40 (40): 229-243, 2005

    6 김 진, "부동산 PF(Project Finance)대출의 부실화 요인에 관한 연구" 대한국토·도시계획학회 44 (44): 175-191, 2009

    7 이한득, "국내 은행의 건전성평가와 시사점" LGERI 19-37, 2008

    8 고성수, "건설사 우발채무의 측정과 기업가치에 관한 연구" 국토연구원 59 : 189-202, 2008

    9 Angoua, P, "Project Risk Choices under Privately Guaranteed Debt Financing" 48 (48): 123-152, 2008

    10 Shah, S, "Optimal Capital Structure and Project Financing" 42 : 209-243, 1987

    11 Foos, D, "Loan Growth and Riskiness of Banks" Center for Economic Policy Research in University of Mannheim 2009

    12 Clair, R.T, "Loan Growth and Loan Quality : Some Preliminary Evidence from Texas Banks" 3Q : 9-22, 1992

    13 Keeton, W.R, "Does Faster Loan Growth Lead to Higher Loan Losses" 84 (84): 57-75, 1999

    14 Klompjan, R, "Default Risk in Project Finance" 8 (8): 10-21, 2002

    15 Jime' nez, G, "Credit Cycles, Credit Risk, and Prudential Regulation" 2 (2): 65-98, 2006

    16 Kleimeier, S, "Are Project Finance Loans Different from Other Syndicated Credits" 13 (13): 75-87, 2000

    17 한국신용평가, "2010년 PF Loan 유동화시장 분석" 2011

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-19 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of Korea Real Estate Analysists Association -> Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-03-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Korea Real Estate Analysists Association KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.64 0.64 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.81 0.85 1.108 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼