RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    The United States’ Uncertain Approach to Network Neutrality

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100042720

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote network neutrality. But while a federal court has upheld the FCC’s authority to regulate broadband, the court also held that nondiscrimination rules go beyond the FCC’s power. This paper discusses the FCC’s approaches to network neutrality and considers other U.S. institutions that may address discrimination issues on the Internet. The paper concludes that the U.S. Internet ecosystem remains fundamentally open, but that openness faces coming challenges from the development of carrier-managed services and the imbalance of traffic delivery between content providers and access networks.
    번역하기

    Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote networ...

    Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote network neutrality. But while a federal court has upheld the FCC’s authority to regulate broadband, the court also held that nondiscrimination rules go beyond the FCC’s power. This paper discusses the FCC’s approaches to network neutrality and considers other U.S. institutions that may address discrimination issues on the Internet. The paper concludes that the U.S. Internet ecosystem remains fundamentally open, but that openness faces coming challenges from the development of carrier-managed services and the imbalance of traffic delivery between content providers and access networks.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • I. Introduction
    • II. The FCC’s Open Internet Rules
    • Ⅲ. The Current State of the U.S. Broadband Regulatory Ecosystem
    • Ⅳ. The Future
    • ABSTRACT
    • I. Introduction
    • II. The FCC’s Open Internet Rules
    • Ⅲ. The Current State of the U.S. Broadband Regulatory Ecosystem
    • Ⅳ. The Future
    • V. Conclusion: comparative thoughts on Korean net neutrality rules
    • References
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corp, "for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications, 20 FCC Rcd. 13028 (2008), vacated , Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"

    2 "Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"

    3 "Verizon Communs. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398"

    4 Lee, Bih-Hwang, "VOIP Services with Embedded CAC over Cable Systems" 51 (51): 2005

    5 Competitive Impact Statement, "United States v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:11-cv-0015"

    6 Reardon, Marguerite, "Understanding the Comcast-Level 3 Spat"

    7 Speta, James B., "The Vertical Dimension of Cable Open Access" 71 (71): 2001

    8 Genachowski, Julius, "The Third Way: A Narrowly Tailored Broadband Framework"

    9 Carrier, Michael A., "The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect" (1265) : 1999

    10 Werden, Gregory J., "The Law and Economics of the Essential Facilities Doctrine" 32 (32): 1987

    1 Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corp, "for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications, 20 FCC Rcd. 13028 (2008), vacated , Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"

    2 "Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"

    3 "Verizon Communs. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398"

    4 Lee, Bih-Hwang, "VOIP Services with Embedded CAC over Cable Systems" 51 (51): 2005

    5 Competitive Impact Statement, "United States v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:11-cv-0015"

    6 Reardon, Marguerite, "Understanding the Comcast-Level 3 Spat"

    7 Speta, James B., "The Vertical Dimension of Cable Open Access" 71 (71): 2001

    8 Genachowski, Julius, "The Third Way: A Narrowly Tailored Broadband Framework"

    9 Carrier, Michael A., "The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect" (1265) : 1999

    10 Werden, Gregory J., "The Law and Economics of the Essential Facilities Doctrine" 32 (32): 1987

    11 Yun, Kyonglim, "The Growth of Broadband Internet Connections in South Korea: Contributing Factors" Stanford Asia/Pacific Research Center

    12 Kearney, Joseph D., "The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law" 97 (97): 1997

    13 Weiser, Philip J., "The Future of Internet Regulation" 43 (43): 2009

    14 Majoras, Deborah Platt, "The Federal Trade Commission in the Online World: Promotion Competition and Protecting Consumers"

    15 Wright, Joshua D., "The Case for An Antitrust Approach to Net Neutrality"

    16 Speta, James B., "Supervising Managed Services" 60 (60): 2011

    17 "Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 19 F.3d 1475"

    18 Koutsky, Thomas M., "Separating Politics from Policy in FCC Merger Reviews: A Basic Legal Primer of the Public Interest Standard" 18 (18): 2009

    19 Letter from Robert W. Quinn Jr., "Senior Vice President, AT&T Servs. Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Sec’y FCC, in Response to Notice of Ex Parte Communication in Review of AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corp. Application for Consent to Transfer of Control, WC Dkt. No. 06-74"

    20 Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet over Wireline Facilities, "Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd. 14,853 (2005), aff’d , Time Warner Telecom, Inc. v. FCC, 507 F.3d 205"

    21 Frieden, Rob, "Rationales For and Against Regulatory Involvement in Resolving Internet Interconnection Disputes" 14 (14): 2012

    22 Salop, Steven C., "Raising Rivals’ Costs" 73 (73): 1983

    23 "Preserving the Open Internet, Report and Order, 25FCC Rcd. 17905 (2010), vacated in part , Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"

    24 Powell, Michael K., "Preserving Internet Freedom:Guiding Principles for the Industry" 3 (3): 2004

    25 Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to Internet over Wireline Facilities, "Policy Statement" 20 (20): 2005

    26 Speta, James B., "Policy Levers and Demand Drivers in Korean Broadband Penetration" 4 (4): 2004

    27 FCC Open Internet Advisory Committee, "Policy Issues in Data Caps and Usage Based Pricing"

    28 Little, Iain, "Peering and Settlement in the Internet: An Economic Analysis" 18 : 2000

    29 "Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. FPC, 506 F.2d 33"

    30 Broache, Anne, "Obama Pledges Net Neutrality Laws if Elected President"

    31 Wu, Tim, "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination" 2 (2): 2003

    32 "NCTA v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967"

    33 Norton, W.B., "Internet Service Providers and Peering"

    34 Clark, David, "Interconnection in the Internet: The Policy Challenge"

    35 SBC Communs, "Inc. and AT&T Communs., Inc., Applications for Transfer of Control of Licenses, 20 FCC Rcd. 16170"

    36 Bump, Philip, "Half of All Internet Traffic in North America Is Just To Watch Netflix and You-Tube"

    37 Sasso, Brendan, "FTC Commissioner Wants To Take Net Neutrality Policy from the FCC"

    38 High Speed Access to the Internet over Cable and Other Facilities, "Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd. 4798 (2002), aff’d , NCTA v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967"

    39 Madison River Communications LLC, "Consent Decree" 20 (20): 2005

    40 Davis, Wendy, "Congress Warns FCC Against Broadband Reclassification" Online Media Daily

    41 Cheredar, Tom, "Comcast Rejiggers its 250 GB Monthly Data Cap Policy"

    42 "Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"

    43 Crawford, Susan P., "Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly in the New Guilded Age"

    44 "Brown Shoe, Inc. v. United States, 380 U.S. 294"

    45 "Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group"

    46 Choudrie, Jyoti, "Broadband Development in South Korea: Institutional and Cultural Factors" 13 (13): 2004

    47 Eisenach, Jeffrey, "Broadband Competition in the Internet Ecosystem" AEI Econ. Studies

    48 Speta, James B., "Antitrust and Regulation in the EU and US" 2008

    49 Speta, James B., "A Common Carrier Approach to Internet Interconnection" 54 (54): 2003

    50 "47 U.S.C. § 543"

    51 "47 U.S.C. § 541"

    52 "47 U.S.C. § 203"

    53 "47 U.S.C. § 202"

    54 "47 U.S.C. § 201"

    55 "47 U.S.C. § 160"

    56 "47 U.S.C. § 153"

    57 "47 U.S.C. § 1302 (Telecommunications Act of 1996,§ 706)"

    58 "15 U.S.C. § 46"

    59 "15 U.S.C. § 45"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.9 0.9 1.17
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.83 1.29 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼