Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote networ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100042720
James B. Speta (Northwestern University)
2014
English
KCI등재후보
학술저널
27-43(17쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote networ...
Despite the prevalence and importance of the broadband Internet in the United States, the Federal Communications Commission’s regulatory approach remains quite unsettled. In 2010, the FCC adopted “Open Internet Rules,” designed to promote network neutrality. But while a federal court has upheld the FCC’s authority to regulate broadband, the court also held that nondiscrimination rules go beyond the FCC’s power. This paper discusses the FCC’s approaches to network neutrality and considers other U.S. institutions that may address discrimination issues on the Internet. The paper concludes that the U.S. Internet ecosystem remains fundamentally open, but that openness faces coming challenges from the development of carrier-managed services and the imbalance of traffic delivery between content providers and access networks.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corp, "for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications, 20 FCC Rcd. 13028 (2008), vacated , Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"
2 "Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"
3 "Verizon Communs. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398"
4 Lee, Bih-Hwang, "VOIP Services with Embedded CAC over Cable Systems" 51 (51): 2005
5 Competitive Impact Statement, "United States v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:11-cv-0015"
6 Reardon, Marguerite, "Understanding the Comcast-Level 3 Spat"
7 Speta, James B., "The Vertical Dimension of Cable Open Access" 71 (71): 2001
8 Genachowski, Julius, "The Third Way: A Narrowly Tailored Broadband Framework"
9 Carrier, Michael A., "The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect" (1265) : 1999
10 Werden, Gregory J., "The Law and Economics of the Essential Facilities Doctrine" 32 (32): 1987
1 Formal Complaint of Free Press and Public Knowledge Against Comcast Corp, "for Secretly Degrading Peer-to-Peer Applications, 20 FCC Rcd. 13028 (2008), vacated , Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"
2 "Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"
3 "Verizon Communs. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, 540 U.S. 398"
4 Lee, Bih-Hwang, "VOIP Services with Embedded CAC over Cable Systems" 51 (51): 2005
5 Competitive Impact Statement, "United States v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:11-cv-0015"
6 Reardon, Marguerite, "Understanding the Comcast-Level 3 Spat"
7 Speta, James B., "The Vertical Dimension of Cable Open Access" 71 (71): 2001
8 Genachowski, Julius, "The Third Way: A Narrowly Tailored Broadband Framework"
9 Carrier, Michael A., "The Real Rule of Reason: Bridging the Disconnect" (1265) : 1999
10 Werden, Gregory J., "The Law and Economics of the Essential Facilities Doctrine" 32 (32): 1987
11 Yun, Kyonglim, "The Growth of Broadband Internet Connections in South Korea: Contributing Factors" Stanford Asia/Pacific Research Center
12 Kearney, Joseph D., "The Great Transformation of Regulated Industries Law" 97 (97): 1997
13 Weiser, Philip J., "The Future of Internet Regulation" 43 (43): 2009
14 Majoras, Deborah Platt, "The Federal Trade Commission in the Online World: Promotion Competition and Protecting Consumers"
15 Wright, Joshua D., "The Case for An Antitrust Approach to Net Neutrality"
16 Speta, James B., "Supervising Managed Services" 60 (60): 2011
17 "Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. FCC, 19 F.3d 1475"
18 Koutsky, Thomas M., "Separating Politics from Policy in FCC Merger Reviews: A Basic Legal Primer of the Public Interest Standard" 18 (18): 2009
19 Letter from Robert W. Quinn Jr., "Senior Vice President, AT&T Servs. Inc. to Marlene H. Dortch, Sec’y FCC, in Response to Notice of Ex Parte Communication in Review of AT&T Inc. and BellSouth Corp. Application for Consent to Transfer of Control, WC Dkt. No. 06-74"
20 Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to the Internet over Wireline Facilities, "Report and Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 20 FCC Rcd. 14,853 (2005), aff’d , Time Warner Telecom, Inc. v. FCC, 507 F.3d 205"
21 Frieden, Rob, "Rationales For and Against Regulatory Involvement in Resolving Internet Interconnection Disputes" 14 (14): 2012
22 Salop, Steven C., "Raising Rivals’ Costs" 73 (73): 1983
23 "Preserving the Open Internet, Report and Order, 25FCC Rcd. 17905 (2010), vacated in part , Verizon v. FCC, 740 F.3d 623"
24 Powell, Michael K., "Preserving Internet Freedom:Guiding Principles for the Industry" 3 (3): 2004
25 Appropriate Framework for Broadband Access to Internet over Wireline Facilities, "Policy Statement" 20 (20): 2005
26 Speta, James B., "Policy Levers and Demand Drivers in Korean Broadband Penetration" 4 (4): 2004
27 FCC Open Internet Advisory Committee, "Policy Issues in Data Caps and Usage Based Pricing"
28 Little, Iain, "Peering and Settlement in the Internet: An Economic Analysis" 18 : 2000
29 "Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. FPC, 506 F.2d 33"
30 Broache, Anne, "Obama Pledges Net Neutrality Laws if Elected President"
31 Wu, Tim, "Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination" 2 (2): 2003
32 "NCTA v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967"
33 Norton, W.B., "Internet Service Providers and Peering"
34 Clark, David, "Interconnection in the Internet: The Policy Challenge"
35 SBC Communs, "Inc. and AT&T Communs., Inc., Applications for Transfer of Control of Licenses, 20 FCC Rcd. 16170"
36 Bump, Philip, "Half of All Internet Traffic in North America Is Just To Watch Netflix and You-Tube"
37 Sasso, Brendan, "FTC Commissioner Wants To Take Net Neutrality Policy from the FCC"
38 High Speed Access to the Internet over Cable and Other Facilities, "Declaratory Ruling and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 17 FCC Rcd. 4798 (2002), aff’d , NCTA v. Brand X Internet Servs., 545 U.S. 967"
39 Madison River Communications LLC, "Consent Decree" 20 (20): 2005
40 Davis, Wendy, "Congress Warns FCC Against Broadband Reclassification" Online Media Daily
41 Cheredar, Tom, "Comcast Rejiggers its 250 GB Monthly Data Cap Policy"
42 "Comcast Corp. v. FCC, 600 F.3d 642"
43 Crawford, Susan P., "Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry and Monopoly in the New Guilded Age"
44 "Brown Shoe, Inc. v. United States, 380 U.S. 294"
45 "Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group"
46 Choudrie, Jyoti, "Broadband Development in South Korea: Institutional and Cultural Factors" 13 (13): 2004
47 Eisenach, Jeffrey, "Broadband Competition in the Internet Ecosystem" AEI Econ. Studies
48 Speta, James B., "Antitrust and Regulation in the EU and US" 2008
49 Speta, James B., "A Common Carrier Approach to Internet Interconnection" 54 (54): 2003
50 "47 U.S.C. § 543"
51 "47 U.S.C. § 541"
52 "47 U.S.C. § 203"
53 "47 U.S.C. § 202"
54 "47 U.S.C. § 201"
55 "47 U.S.C. § 160"
56 "47 U.S.C. § 153"
57 "47 U.S.C. § 1302 (Telecommunications Act of 1996,§ 706)"
58 "15 U.S.C. § 46"
59 "15 U.S.C. § 45"
우리나라의 망 중립성 규제와 인터넷 트래픽 관리: 이슈와 평가
Net Neutrality Regulation in the UK
Net Neutrality in Europe and Germany
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2028 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2022-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2019-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2016-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.17 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.89 | 0.83 | 1.29 | 0.25 |