RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      망중립성 보장과 기본권 보호 = Net Neutrality and Fundamental Human Rights

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106159158

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Equality of access and information(packet) is a crucial part for the innovation and the alteration, and also it has boosted fundamental human rights. Therefore, problems of the net neutrality must be resolved not by how to design the inter-net system and to regulate the inter-net, but by understanding what the net neutrality affects and protection of the net neutrality.
      The inter-net is a public tool for all people to use for their own innovation. And it plays a role as an infrastructure in information-oriented society. The net neutrality principle, created naturally, is the foundation of the innovation and increases fundamental human rights. The proper state intervention to the net neutrality principle is reasonable because innovation from below implies political-legal values, such as formation of the public opinion, participatory democracy and guarantee of fundamental human rights.
      The net neutrality is peculiar because it tends to preserve original values of the inter-net via a realization of data equality. A legal concept of the net neutrality needs to be technology-neutral and to accomplish a concept of justice.
      The net neutrality means that governments or ISPs must not violate people’s fundamental human rights against blocking access or unreasonable discrimination in transmitting of senders-recipients, information(packet), device. The equality is not only a purpose of the constitutional law but also a measure to protect another basic values of the law. A criterion of judgment on equality should be a specific content of violated rights. It is because other specific fundamental rights can be violated by the unreasonable discrimination in a real society though the discrimination is a just simple discrimination of personnel and materiel elements in public network.
      Neutral and open managements of the inter-net have leaded to the innovation and increased fundamental human rights. Therefore, the problem we have is not a choice in whether the net is managed neutrally, but rather it is a consideration of the regulation over the technology, affects innovation and fundamental human rights. It should be a reestablishment of fundamental human rights and a united legal system.
      Many fundamental human rights are violated in these days due to lack of the general rules on the net neutrality. We need to prepare against the violations. Also related basic human rights(equality, freedom of expression, privacy, communication secret) should be harmonized in a regulation or guarantee of the net neutrality.
      번역하기

      Equality of access and information(packet) is a crucial part for the innovation and the alteration, and also it has boosted fundamental human rights. Therefore, problems of the net neutrality must be resolved not by how to design the inter-net system ...

      Equality of access and information(packet) is a crucial part for the innovation and the alteration, and also it has boosted fundamental human rights. Therefore, problems of the net neutrality must be resolved not by how to design the inter-net system and to regulate the inter-net, but by understanding what the net neutrality affects and protection of the net neutrality.
      The inter-net is a public tool for all people to use for their own innovation. And it plays a role as an infrastructure in information-oriented society. The net neutrality principle, created naturally, is the foundation of the innovation and increases fundamental human rights. The proper state intervention to the net neutrality principle is reasonable because innovation from below implies political-legal values, such as formation of the public opinion, participatory democracy and guarantee of fundamental human rights.
      The net neutrality is peculiar because it tends to preserve original values of the inter-net via a realization of data equality. A legal concept of the net neutrality needs to be technology-neutral and to accomplish a concept of justice.
      The net neutrality means that governments or ISPs must not violate people’s fundamental human rights against blocking access or unreasonable discrimination in transmitting of senders-recipients, information(packet), device. The equality is not only a purpose of the constitutional law but also a measure to protect another basic values of the law. A criterion of judgment on equality should be a specific content of violated rights. It is because other specific fundamental rights can be violated by the unreasonable discrimination in a real society though the discrimination is a just simple discrimination of personnel and materiel elements in public network.
      Neutral and open managements of the inter-net have leaded to the innovation and increased fundamental human rights. Therefore, the problem we have is not a choice in whether the net is managed neutrally, but rather it is a consideration of the regulation over the technology, affects innovation and fundamental human rights. It should be a reestablishment of fundamental human rights and a united legal system.
      Many fundamental human rights are violated in these days due to lack of the general rules on the net neutrality. We need to prepare against the violations. Also related basic human rights(equality, freedom of expression, privacy, communication secret) should be harmonized in a regulation or guarantee of the net neutrality.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

      2 성낙인, "헌법학 제11판(개정판)" 법문사 2011

      3 허진성, "헌법적 쟁점으로서의 망중립성, 망중립성 문제의 현안과 전망" 2011

      4 박용상, "표현의 자유" 현암사 2002

      5 "통신망의 합리적 관리⋅이용과 트래픽 관리의 투명성에 관한 기준" 미래창조과학부 2012

      6 전학선, "정보통신기술의 발전과 입법정책" 국회도서관 2006

      7 권양섭, "인터넷 패킷감청의 허용가능성에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (39) : 177-198, 2010

      8 강유리, "인터넷 트래픽 관리와 DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)" 정보통신정책연구원 25 (25): 2013

      9 오길영, "인터넷 감청과 DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)" 민주주의법학연구회 (41) : 391-426, 2009

      10 문재완, "언론법 : 한국의 현실과 이론" 늘봄 2008

      1 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

      2 성낙인, "헌법학 제11판(개정판)" 법문사 2011

      3 허진성, "헌법적 쟁점으로서의 망중립성, 망중립성 문제의 현안과 전망" 2011

      4 박용상, "표현의 자유" 현암사 2002

      5 "통신망의 합리적 관리⋅이용과 트래픽 관리의 투명성에 관한 기준" 미래창조과학부 2012

      6 전학선, "정보통신기술의 발전과 입법정책" 국회도서관 2006

      7 권양섭, "인터넷 패킷감청의 허용가능성에 관한 고찰" 한국법학회 (39) : 177-198, 2010

      8 강유리, "인터넷 트래픽 관리와 DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)" 정보통신정책연구원 25 (25): 2013

      9 오길영, "인터넷 감청과 DPI(Deep Packet Inspection)" 민주주의법학연구회 (41) : 391-426, 2009

      10 문재완, "언론법 : 한국의 현실과 이론" 늘봄 2008

      11 김성환, "양면시장(two-sided market) 이론에 따른 방송통신 서비스 정책 이슈 연구" 정보통신 정책연구원 2008

      12 "애플, 아이폰에 위치정보 파일 몰래 심어"

      13 "아이폰 사용자 위치 노출”… 英가디언 “위치정보파일형태 저장, 유출 위험"

      14 "성인도 스마트폰으로 해외 음란물 못 본다"

      15 김대환, "불문헌법으로서 열거되지 아니한 자유와 권리- 비교법적 고찰 -" 세계헌법학회한국학회 15 (15): 23-58, 2009

      16 곽정호, "미국의 망중립성(Network Neutrality) 도입 논의" 18 (18): 2006

      17 이상경, "미국 연방대법원의 헌법재판권의 범위와 삼중 위헌심사 기준론에 관한 소고" 세계헌법학회한국학회 13 (13): 96-116, 2007

      18 안정민, "미국 FCC 망중립성 규제의 허와 실" 서울대학교 공익산업법센터 2 (2): 2009

      19 경실련, "모바일인터넷전화 제한 SKT와 KT, 공정위-방통위에 고발"

      20 "망중립성 및 인터넷 트래픽 관리에 관한 가이드라인" 방송통신위원회 2011

      21 김대환, "기본권제한의 한계" 법영사 2001

      22 "olleh internet 이용약관"

      23 Emerson, Thomas I., "Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment" 1963

      24 Kempf & Austein, "The Rise of the Middle and the Future of end-to-end: Reflections on the Evolution of the Internet Architecture" 2004

      25 Helmut Schwarzer, "Medienpolitik und Rezipientenfreiheit, Grundfragen zum Recht auf Nutzung fortenwickelter Massenkommunikationsmittel und zur Bedeutung von Kabel und Satellit für eine Europäische Rundfunkzone" Peter Lang 1992

      26 FCC, "In the Matter of Preserve the Open Internet Broadband Industry Practices"

      27 신승원, "DPI 기술 분석" 19 (19): 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼