RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      미국 Dodd-Frank법과 채굴산업 투명성 이니셔티브가 해외 자원개발 산업에 갖는 함의에 관한 소고 = Impact of the US Dodd-Frank Act and the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative on Overseas Natural Resource Development Industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106159156

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Natural resources, such as oil, gas, and minerals, belong to a country’s citizens and extraction of these resources is supposed to lead to economic growth and social development. However, when poorly managed it has often lead to corruption and conflict. There were academic researches on the Resource Curse by scholars detailing how the potential benefits of oil, gas and mining were not being realized and were associated with increased poverty, conflict and corruption. Considering the complexities of the governance of extractive resources, it was agreed that more openness regarding how a country manages its natural resource wealth is necessary, and coordinated efforts was made to establish an international regime for the openness in the extractive industry.
      The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is an international regime to promote open and accountable management of natural resources. It seeks to strengthen government and company systems, inform public, and enhance trust, by disclosing details of revenue of payment relating to extractive industries. EITI is based on voluntary participation by the governments of host countries and it does not have mandatory power to enforce the rules. However, the enactment of US Dodd-Frank Act Section 1504 makes it possible to enforce disclosure of details of payment made by extractive companies to host governments. In this paper, the interaction between EITI and Section 1504 and its impact on the extractive industry is explored. From this perspective, this paper examines the structure of EITI, the US legislation of Dodd-Frank Act Section 1504, the court decision in API vs SEC and the impact of Dodd-Frank Act and EITI on the overseas natural resources development industry.
      번역하기

      Natural resources, such as oil, gas, and minerals, belong to a country’s citizens and extraction of these resources is supposed to lead to economic growth and social development. However, when poorly managed it has often lead to corruption and confl...

      Natural resources, such as oil, gas, and minerals, belong to a country’s citizens and extraction of these resources is supposed to lead to economic growth and social development. However, when poorly managed it has often lead to corruption and conflict. There were academic researches on the Resource Curse by scholars detailing how the potential benefits of oil, gas and mining were not being realized and were associated with increased poverty, conflict and corruption. Considering the complexities of the governance of extractive resources, it was agreed that more openness regarding how a country manages its natural resource wealth is necessary, and coordinated efforts was made to establish an international regime for the openness in the extractive industry.
      The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is an international regime to promote open and accountable management of natural resources. It seeks to strengthen government and company systems, inform public, and enhance trust, by disclosing details of revenue of payment relating to extractive industries. EITI is based on voluntary participation by the governments of host countries and it does not have mandatory power to enforce the rules. However, the enactment of US Dodd-Frank Act Section 1504 makes it possible to enforce disclosure of details of payment made by extractive companies to host governments. In this paper, the interaction between EITI and Section 1504 and its impact on the extractive industry is explored. From this perspective, this paper examines the structure of EITI, the US legislation of Dodd-Frank Act Section 1504, the court decision in API vs SEC and the impact of Dodd-Frank Act and EITI on the overseas natural resources development industry.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 배윤정, "채굴산업 회사들의 대정부지출내역 공시의무에 관한 미법원 판결" CGS Report 2013

      2 최철, "채굴산업 투명성 이니셔티브와 관련 해외입법 연구" EMRD 2014

      3 Publish What You Pay, "United States Legislative History: Cardin-Lugar Amendment or Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act"

      4 EITI International Secretariat, "The EITI Standard" 2013

      5 Darby, Sefton, "The Case for Company-by-Company Reporting of Data in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative" Revenue Watch Institute 2009

      6 "SEC Release No. 34-67717 (File No. S7-42-10)"

      7 Moran, Theodore H., "Reform EITI to Require Compliant Countries to Publish Disaggregated Company-by-Company Revenue Payment" Center for Global Development 2013

      8 Moran, Theodore H, "Promoting Universal Transparency in Extractive Industries: How and Why?" Center for Global Development 2011

      9 Publish What You Pay, "Oil Company Lawsuit Against US Securities and Exchange Commission Threatens Global Transparency Initiative"

      10 EITI International Secretariat, "Factsheet" 2014

      1 배윤정, "채굴산업 회사들의 대정부지출내역 공시의무에 관한 미법원 판결" CGS Report 2013

      2 최철, "채굴산업 투명성 이니셔티브와 관련 해외입법 연구" EMRD 2014

      3 Publish What You Pay, "United States Legislative History: Cardin-Lugar Amendment or Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform and Consumer Protection Act"

      4 EITI International Secretariat, "The EITI Standard" 2013

      5 Darby, Sefton, "The Case for Company-by-Company Reporting of Data in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative" Revenue Watch Institute 2009

      6 "SEC Release No. 34-67717 (File No. S7-42-10)"

      7 Moran, Theodore H., "Reform EITI to Require Compliant Countries to Publish Disaggregated Company-by-Company Revenue Payment" Center for Global Development 2013

      8 Moran, Theodore H, "Promoting Universal Transparency in Extractive Industries: How and Why?" Center for Global Development 2011

      9 Publish What You Pay, "Oil Company Lawsuit Against US Securities and Exchange Commission Threatens Global Transparency Initiative"

      10 EITI International Secretariat, "Factsheet" 2014

      11 Publish What You Pay, "Fact Sheet-SEC Rules for Oil and Mineral Payment Disclosure"

      12 Publish What You Pay, "Fact Sheet - EU rules for disclosure of payments to governments by oil, gas and mining (extractive industry) and logging companies"

      13 David-Barrett, "European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption ad State-Building" 2013

      14 "Am. Petroleum Inst. v. S.E.C., CIV.A. 12-1668 JDB, 2013 WL 3307114"

      15 Darby, Sefton, "Advancing the EITI in the mining sector: implementation issues" World Bank 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼