기호학， 역사， 열린 이론

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Semiotics, History, and an Open Theory

Prof. Sangjin Park
(Pusan University of Foreign Studies)

Framing is necessary for us to cope with or "resolve"
history (world, knowledge and life) as it is the lens through
which we observe them. In other words, the framing our
history is necessary for our understanding of it. However,
what we need to notice is the process in which history is
framed or to define its ideological nature.
Walter Benjamin discusses the "history of the victors" only
from their point of view does the historical process appear to
be a unitary one which can be described as rational and
consequential. The vanquished cannot see it in the same
light, because their own affairs and struggles have been
violently expunged from the collective memory formed by the
victors. The victors control history, preserving in it only
what fits the image of history that they have created in
order to legitimate their own power. In this respect, a frame
through which we observe history could be seen as a booty of
the victors of history. On the other hand, we need to trace
back to the vanquished voice. This work allows us to , in the
appropriate sense, listen to a "living memory" of being that
provides us with a concrete identity, whereby to deconstruct
the frame of history that promotes the objectified fact and
abstract identity.
In this paper attempted to frame a new theory through
which we are able to seek a way of not being expunged from
a rational-consequential ordered frame and participating to
our history and, ultimately, our life. This is a way of
understanding history properly beyond "history of the
victors". In this respect, the "resolving" history means raising
a conscious debate about it rather than framing it.

Key Words: Semiotics, Openness, History, Memory, Culture,
Knowledge, Theory.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ.기호학의 자리 1
• 1.기호학의 자리 1
• 2.삶의 틀 짜기에서 틀의 삶 읽기로 7
• 3.틀의 삶 읽기와 역사 14
• 3.1이론의 삶 17
• 3.2소통의 삶 19
• 4.결론 21