RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      External Validation of the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment-S Score in Koreans Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104592037

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate the validity of the University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment-S score (CAPRA-S score), a biochemical indicator of recurrent prostate cancer that uses histopathologic data, in Korean prostate cancer patients.
      Materials and Methods: A total of 203 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between February 1997 and November 2010 were observed for longer than 6 months. The CAPRA-S score of 134 patients for whom records were available for preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic specimen Gleason score,surgical margin, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, and lymph node invasion were calculated. Biochemical recurrence was defined as repetitive measurement of PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at least 6 months after surgery with at least a 4-week interval.
      The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for the statistical testing.
      Results: The CAPRA-S scores were divided into nine groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was reduced as the CAPRA-S score increased compared with the group with a CAPRA-S score of 0–1. The CAPRA-S score in this study was more sensitive to biochemical recurrence than was the CAPRA score conducted at this institution (CAPRA-S concordance index, 0.776; CAPRA concordance index, 0.728).
      Conclusions: The CAPRA-S score is judged to be a useful tool for predicting the disease-free survival rate of Korean prostate cancer patients and is thought to assist in establishing postoperative management.
      번역하기

      Purpose: To evaluate the validity of the University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment-S score (CAPRA-S score), a biochemical indicator of recurrent prostate cancer that uses histopathologic data, in Korean prostate can...

      Purpose: To evaluate the validity of the University of California San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment-S score (CAPRA-S score), a biochemical indicator of recurrent prostate cancer that uses histopathologic data, in Korean prostate cancer patients.
      Materials and Methods: A total of 203 prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between February 1997 and November 2010 were observed for longer than 6 months. The CAPRA-S score of 134 patients for whom records were available for preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), pathologic specimen Gleason score,surgical margin, seminal vesicle invasion, extracapsular extension, and lymph node invasion were calculated. Biochemical recurrence was defined as repetitive measurement of PSA ≥0.2 ng/mL at least 6 months after surgery with at least a 4-week interval.
      The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for the statistical testing.
      Results: The CAPRA-S scores were divided into nine groups. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was reduced as the CAPRA-S score increased compared with the group with a CAPRA-S score of 0–1. The CAPRA-S score in this study was more sensitive to biochemical recurrence than was the CAPRA score conducted at this institution (CAPRA-S concordance index, 0.776; CAPRA concordance index, 0.728).
      Conclusions: The CAPRA-S score is judged to be a useful tool for predicting the disease-free survival rate of Korean prostate cancer patients and is thought to assist in establishing postoperative management.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 May M, "Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients" 178 : 1957-1962, 2007

      2 Penson DF, "Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prostate cancer" 177 : 2020-2029, 2007

      3 Mattei A, "The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study" 53 : 118-125, 2008

      4 Cooperberg MR, "The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 173 : 1938-1942, 2005

      5 Cooperberg MR, "The CAPRA-S score: a straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy" 117 : 5039-5046, 2011

      6 Touijer K, "Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%" 178 : 120-124, 2007

      7 Freedland SJ, "Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 294 : 433-439, 2005

      8 Cooperberg MR, "Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis" 101 : 878-887, 2009

      9 Burkhard FC, "Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection" 42 : 84-90, 2002

      10 Stephenson AJ, "Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 98 : 715-717, 2006

      1 May M, "Validity of the CAPRA score to predict biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Results from a european multicenter survey of 1,296 patients" 178 : 1957-1962, 2007

      2 Penson DF, "Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prostate cancer" 177 : 2020-2029, 2007

      3 Mattei A, "The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study" 53 : 118-125, 2008

      4 Cooperberg MR, "The University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score: a straightforward and reliable preoperative predictor of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 173 : 1938-1942, 2005

      5 Cooperberg MR, "The CAPRA-S score: a straightforward tool for improved prediction of outcomes after radical prostatectomy" 117 : 5039-5046, 2011

      6 Touijer K, "Standard versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer in patients with a predicted probability of nodal metastasis greater than 1%" 178 : 120-124, 2007

      7 Freedland SJ, "Risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality following biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 294 : 433-439, 2005

      8 Cooperberg MR, "Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis" 101 : 878-887, 2009

      9 Burkhard FC, "Reliability of preoperative values to determine the need for lymphadenectomy in patients with prostate cancer and meticulous lymph node dissection" 42 : 84-90, 2002

      10 Stephenson AJ, "Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 98 : 715-717, 2006

      11 Vickers A, "Prediction models in urology: are they any good, and how would we know anyway?" 57 : 571-573, 2010

      12 Kattan MW, "Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer" 17 : 1499-1507, 1999

      13 Cooperberg MR, "Multiinstitutional validation of the UCSF cancer of the prostate risk assessment for prediction of recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 107 : 2384-2391, 2006

      14 Messing EM, "Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy" 7 : 472-479, 2006

      15 Lughezzani G, "Head-to-head comparison of the three most commonly used preoperative models for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 57 : 562-568, 2010

      16 Zhao KH, "External validation of University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score" 72 : 396-400, 2008

      17 Jemal A, "Cancer statistics, 2010" 60 : 277-300, 2010

      18 Bauer JJ, "Biostatistical modeling using traditional variables and genetic biomarkers for predicting the risk of prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy" 79 : 952-962, 1997

      19 Han M, "Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer" 169 : 517-523, 2003

      20 Shariat SF, "An updated catalog of prostate cancer predictive tools" 113 : 3075-3099, 2008

      21 Thompson IM, "Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial" 181 : 956-962, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회 -> 대한비뇨의학회 KCI등재
      2016-03-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2016-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Urology -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-02-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Urology
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Urology -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.314 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼