RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영어 시제의 효율적인 교수ㆍ학습 전략

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82516908

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Although the understanding of English tense system is a crucial factor for communicative English learning and teaching for EFL students, it has been neglected over the years. As with other areas of the grammar, difficulties may arise from the nature of the system itself or from differences between time, tense and aspect. Consequently, many learners face a considerable difficulty with the English tense system as they are more often unable to grasp the basic conceptual differences of present/present continuous, past/present perfect, will/be going to along with many others. More concerning fact is that lots of instructors or so-called native English teachers seem not to be aware of the importance of teaching English tense system. The purpose of this study is to review and examine various theories and practical usages of tense in order to establish and/or present better methods for teaching tenses. This paper is focused on comparatively exact distinction of time, physical notion from tense, grammatical category as well as sequences of tenses in view of school grammar and communicative function. At the end or middle of each chapter, efficient teaching and learning techniques or strategies on tenses are suggested to help instructors or learners who relentlessly face confusions in understanding tense and its usage for communicative English learning and teaching. This study attempts to influence learners’ ability to recognize and write tense in authentic contexts not to mention spoken English.
    번역하기

      Although the understanding of English tense system is a crucial factor for communicative English learning and teaching for EFL students, it has been neglected over the years. As with other areas of the grammar, difficulties may arise from ...

      Although the understanding of English tense system is a crucial factor for communicative English learning and teaching for EFL students, it has been neglected over the years. As with other areas of the grammar, difficulties may arise from the nature of the system itself or from differences between time, tense and aspect. Consequently, many learners face a considerable difficulty with the English tense system as they are more often unable to grasp the basic conceptual differences of present/present continuous, past/present perfect, will/be going to along with many others. More concerning fact is that lots of instructors or so-called native English teachers seem not to be aware of the importance of teaching English tense system. The purpose of this study is to review and examine various theories and practical usages of tense in order to establish and/or present better methods for teaching tenses. This paper is focused on comparatively exact distinction of time, physical notion from tense, grammatical category as well as sequences of tenses in view of school grammar and communicative function. At the end or middle of each chapter, efficient teaching and learning techniques or strategies on tenses are suggested to help instructors or learners who relentlessly face confusions in understanding tense and its usage for communicative English learning and teaching. This study attempts to influence learners’ ability to recognize and write tense in authentic contexts not to mention spoken English.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정희자, "영어에서 시제의 선택 조건" 745-765, 1988

    2 조성식, "영어문법론 연구" 고려대학교 출판부 1974

    3 남기심, "국어문법의 시제문제에 관한 연구 어문학 연구 신서" 탑출판사 1977

    4 Allen, "The verb system of present-day American English" 1982

    5 Smith, "The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English" 66-67, 1978

    6 Jespersen, "The philosophy of grammar" 1924

    7 Costa, "Sequences of tense in that-clause in Papers from the eighth regional meeting" 46-47, 1972

    8 Reichenbach, "Elements of symbolic logic" Macmillan 1947

    9 Im, Byung-Bin, "Effective learning tasks and activities to improve EFL listening comprehension" 6 (6): 1-24, 2000

    10 "A grammar of late modern English" (ordhoff) : 1926

    1 정희자, "영어에서 시제의 선택 조건" 745-765, 1988

    2 조성식, "영어문법론 연구" 고려대학교 출판부 1974

    3 남기심, "국어문법의 시제문제에 관한 연구 어문학 연구 신서" 탑출판사 1977

    4 Allen, "The verb system of present-day American English" 1982

    5 Smith, "The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English" 66-67, 1978

    6 Jespersen, "The philosophy of grammar" 1924

    7 Costa, "Sequences of tense in that-clause in Papers from the eighth regional meeting" 46-47, 1972

    8 Reichenbach, "Elements of symbolic logic" Macmillan 1947

    9 Im, Byung-Bin, "Effective learning tasks and activities to improve EFL listening comprehension" 6 (6): 1-24, 2000

    10 "A grammar of late modern English" (ordhoff) : 1926

    11 Quirk, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" 1985

    12 Quirk, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" 1973

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-03-22 학술지등록 한글명 : 영어어문교육
    외국어명 : English Language & Literature Teaching
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.75 0.75 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.71 0.66 1.12 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼