김수영의 문학적 좌표로서의 해방직후 = A new understanding of Kim Soo-young`s Literature in 1960s -The Liberation age as Kim`s Literary reference point

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this article is to approach Kim Soo-young`s poetry and essays in 1960s as a new view beyond the fixed point that lots of studies have decided for the last several years. Most of the studies have concentrated on the historical event 4?19 revolution with Kim`s writing, but those universalized perspectives could not resolve some problems : First, Kim who had reacted to sensitively the incident remarked that writers defected to North Korea even if the situation that people exclaimed ``freedom`` and ``democracy`` at the revolution. The next, the blame toward literary friends interacted just after Liberation age at the 1960s. These problems seem to be insignificant at first sight, but just is the most internal core of Kim`s statements that appeared abruptly. The two problems above mentioned turn up in Kim`s literature as figures of poets Park In-hwan and Im Hwa. What the novel 〈A Volunteer Army〉 represents, Im Hwa is the ``revolutionist`` used to frequently be expressed"leftist poet", and he is the object of identification with Kim at the same time a ``gaze`` made a guilty conscience by failure to the identification with Kim who could not participated in revolution just after Liberation. Cause of the blame is also the guilty conscience that Im`s gaze aroused. His observational gaze that live phantom is a function as self-reflection not only about the revolution just after Liberation, but also the react to the following the Liberation(following the revolution). This reflection by failure of the revolution and ``following revolution`` is called at the ``following revolution`` 4?19 in 1960s. Kim constantly tried to identify himself living 1960s simultaneously following Liberation. And the symptom that revealed by that highly appraising writers defected to North Korea ``conscientious`` himself, and denouncing literary friends including the Park who confused ideologically and could react to anything still remain South like himself. Kim`s problematical remarks in 1960s was a symptom revealed in relation to revolution just after Liberation. His poetry and essays direct that he is constantly aware of Liberation age as the literary coordinate and the historical reference point, not only written rely on the affected passion by the 4?19 revolution.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이재복, "현대문학의 흐름과 전망" 작가 2004

2 김윤식, "한국현대문학비평사론" 서울대학교출판부 2000

3 차혜영, "한국문학의 근대성과 모더니즘에 관한 연구사 다시읽기" 민족문학사학회 2000

4 서경석, "한국근대문학사 연구" 태학사 1999

5 이현우, "폭력이란 무엇인가" 난장이 2011

6 박연희, "전후, 마리서사, 세계의 감각. In 아프레걸 사상계를 읽다" 동국대출판부 2009

7 사울 크립키, "이름과 필연" 서광사 1986

8 슬라보예 지젝, "이데올로기라는 숭고한 대상" 인간사랑 2001

9 자크 라캉, "세미나11:정신분석의 네 가지 근본개념" 새물결 2008

10 김경린, "새로운 도시들과 시민들의 합창" 서문. 도시문화사 1949

11 김정환, "벽(壁)의 변증법" (겨울) : 1998

12 조강석, "김수영의 시의식 변모 과정 연구 -‘시적 연극성’과 ‘자코메티적 전환’을 중심으로" 한국시학회 (28) : 361-387, 2010

13 유성호, "김수영의 문학비평. In 살아있는 김수영" 창비 2005

14 조강석, "김수영과 관념의 조형성" 2005

15 최하림, "김수영 평전" 실천문학사 2001

16 김수영, "김수영 전집2" 민음사 2003

17 김수영, "김수영 전집1" 민음사 1981

18 김수영, "김수영 전집 별권․김수영의 문학" 민음사 1983

19 김혜진, "김수영 문학에 나타난 근대의 속도와 윤리" 한양대학교 2010

20 김재용, "김수영 문학과 분단극복의 현재성. In 살아있는 김수영" 창비 2005

21 김승희, "김수영 다시읽기" 프레스21 2000

22 최하림, "김수영 개인사의 문제들과 검토. In 살아있는 김수영" 창비 2005

23 황정산, "김수영" 새미 2002

24 박연희, "‘전후’의 중층적 의미와 김수영의 문학적 정체성 —1950년대 후반기 지식인 담론과 김수영의 시를 중심으로—" 상허학회 29 : 377-410, 2010

25 백낙청, "4․19의 역사적 의의와 현재성" (여름) : 1980