경기도립 청소년수련시설의 활성화 방안 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 건립 24년이 경과하여 시설 노후화와 정체성 혼란을 겪
고 있는 경기도립 청소년수련시설(경기도청소년수련원)의 구조적 문
제점을 진단하고, 실질적인 활성화 방안을 도출하는 데 목적이 있
다. 이를 위해 학계, 현장 전문가, 운영진 등 총 10명의 전문가 패널
을 구성하여 3차에 걸친 델파이 조사(Delphi Method)를 실시하였다.
1차 조사는 개방형 질문을 통해 활성화 아이디어를 수집하였으며, 2
차 및 3차 조사는 구조화된 설문을 통해 각 항목의 중요도, 시급성,
실행가능성을 평가하고 내용타당도 비율(CVR), 합의도, 수렴도를 검
증하여 최종 활성화 방안을 확정하였다.
본 연구의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 시설 현황 및 개선 영
역에서는 단순한 노후 시설 보수를 넘어선 '공간 혁신'이 요구되었
다. 전문가들은 '공용공간 및 로비의 현대화'와 '폐쇄된 수영장의 유
휴공간 활용'에 높은 합의를 보였으며, 이는 청소년의 트렌드를 반
영한 개방형 커뮤니티 공간 조성과 시각적 이미지 개선이 최우선
과제임을 시사한다. 둘째, 정책 연계성 강화 영역에서는 현행 조직
구조의 한계를 극복하기 위한 '기능 분리'가 핵심 과제로 도출되었
다. 델파이 분석 결과, '청소년본부(정책 기획)'와 '청소년수련원(시
설 운영)'의 기능을 명확히 분리하고, 도립 시설이 경기도 청소년정
책의 광역 컨트롤타워 역할을 수행해야 한다는 항목이 가장 높은
타당도(CVR 1.00)를 확보하였다. 또한 데이터 기반의 정책 수립과
현장 피드백 체계 구축의 필요성이 확인되었다. 셋째, 광역 단위 고
유 기능 영역에서는 31개 시·군 시설과의 차별화 전략이 강조되었
다. 도립 시설은 기초자치단체 시설과 경쟁이 아닌 상호보완적 협력
- iv -
관계를 구축해야 하며, 우수한 자연환경을 활용한 특성화 활동 개발
과 시·군 시설의 지원 플랫폼 역할 수행이 핵심 과제로 도출되었다.
이러한 연구 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구는 단기(시설 개선·협의체
구성), 중기(네트워크 구축), 장기(정책 거점화)의 단계별 전략을 제
안하였으며, 특히 시설 운영 중심의 현행 조직을 정책 기능 중심의
청소년본부로 전환하는 조직 개편안을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 광역
단위 청소년수련시설의 활성화 전략을 제시함으로써 경기도뿐 아니
라 타 광역자치단체 청소년시설 운영 개선에 실무적 기초자료를 제
공한다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• 1. 연구의 필요성···············································································1
• 2. 연구 목적 및 문제 ·······································································4
• 3. 용어의 정의 ···················································································7
• Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
• 1. 국립 청소년수련시설의 역할과 기능 ·······································8
• 2. 도립 청소년수련시설 현황 및 유형 ·······································13
• 3. 공공 청소년수련시설 선행연구 ···············································22
• Ⅲ. 연구 방법
• 1. 델파이 방법 ·················································································27
• 2. 연구의 대상 ·················································································31
• 3. 측정 도구 ·····················································································35
• 4. 설문지 및 질문 구성·································································37
• 5. 자료 수집 및 분석 ·····································································40
• Ⅳ. 연구 결과
• 1. 1차 델파이 조사결과 ·································································43
• 2. 2차 델파이 조사결과 ·································································57
• 3. 3차 델파이 조사결과 ·································································65
• - vi -
• Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
• 1. 결론 ·······························································································74
• 2. 제언 ·······························································································76
• 참고문헌 ·······························································································80
• ABSTRACT ······················································································83
• 부록 ·······································································································86