RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    성인 돌봄서비스 품질관리제도의 다양한 모습 = 스웨덴, 영국, 미국, 싱가포르, 일본, 한국의 비교를 중심으로

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100027424

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to explore the pictures on quality assurance system of social care services and related factors in Western and Eastern countries. Since social care services are delivered by direct physical contact, securing safety and respect is foremost important. For this reason, quality management scheme is essential for running social care services. By comparing six countries, this study examined these aspects.
    The result shows that the national pictures of quality assurance systems since 1990 are categorized into three types. First type sets the purpose of national quality system mainly on the protection of service users from for-profit providers and promotion of user choice among diverse providers (UK and Sweden). Second type promotes quality system based on voluntary participation of providers. In this type, marketization and privatization are regarded as tools for quality assurance (US and Japan). Third type considers the quality system as bureaucratic control scheme to enhance efficiency and responsibility of service providers (Singapore and Korea).
    But the pictures of quality management of these countries can’t be attributed to any single factor. It seems that political environment, culture of government administration, citizen’s expectation to the role of state, development level of social care services are all related to present picture of quality system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to explore the pictures on quality assurance system of social care services and related factors in Western and Eastern countries. Since social care services are delivered by direct physical contact, securing safety and res...

    The purpose of this study is to explore the pictures on quality assurance system of social care services and related factors in Western and Eastern countries. Since social care services are delivered by direct physical contact, securing safety and respect is foremost important. For this reason, quality management scheme is essential for running social care services. By comparing six countries, this study examined these aspects.
    The result shows that the national pictures of quality assurance systems since 1990 are categorized into three types. First type sets the purpose of national quality system mainly on the protection of service users from for-profit providers and promotion of user choice among diverse providers (UK and Sweden). Second type promotes quality system based on voluntary participation of providers. In this type, marketization and privatization are regarded as tools for quality assurance (US and Japan). Third type considers the quality system as bureaucratic control scheme to enhance efficiency and responsibility of service providers (Singapore and Korea).
    But the pictures of quality management of these countries can’t be attributed to any single factor. It seems that political environment, culture of government administration, citizen’s expectation to the role of state, development level of social care services are all related to present picture of quality system.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 국회보건복지위원회, 2014

    2 양난주, "한국 사회복지서비스의 변화 -행위자간 관계의 분석-" 한국사회복지학회 62 (62): 79-102, 2010

    3 이봉주, "지역복지기관의 사회서비스 관리와 평가: 무엇을, 왜, 어떻게" 한국사회복지행정학회 15 (15): 197-221, 2013

    4 정기혜, "주요국의 사회보장제도: 영국" 한국보건사회연구원 2012

    5 한창완, "일본의 이용자 선택제도와 사회서비스 제공주체 구성의 변화" 9-36, 2011

    6 오정수, "영국의 공공사회복지실천 - 변화와 쟁점" 4 : 113-130, 2000

    7 김용득, "영국 사회복지서비스의 구조와 서비스 질 관리 체계" 125 : 76-91, 2007

    8 강선경, "사회서비스 품질향상방안 및 관리모형 도출에 관한 연구" 보건복지부 2007

    9 김학주, "사회서비스 품질관리체계의 해외 동향 및 개혁방안" 한국사회복지정책학회 36 (36): 237-261, 2009

    10 이봉주, "사회서비스 품질관리 전담기구 설치에 관한 연구" 보건복지부·서울대학교 산학협력단·서울대학교 사회복지연구소 2012

    1 국회보건복지위원회, 2014

    2 양난주, "한국 사회복지서비스의 변화 -행위자간 관계의 분석-" 한국사회복지학회 62 (62): 79-102, 2010

    3 이봉주, "지역복지기관의 사회서비스 관리와 평가: 무엇을, 왜, 어떻게" 한국사회복지행정학회 15 (15): 197-221, 2013

    4 정기혜, "주요국의 사회보장제도: 영국" 한국보건사회연구원 2012

    5 한창완, "일본의 이용자 선택제도와 사회서비스 제공주체 구성의 변화" 9-36, 2011

    6 오정수, "영국의 공공사회복지실천 - 변화와 쟁점" 4 : 113-130, 2000

    7 김용득, "영국 사회복지서비스의 구조와 서비스 질 관리 체계" 125 : 76-91, 2007

    8 강선경, "사회서비스 품질향상방안 및 관리모형 도출에 관한 연구" 보건복지부 2007

    9 김학주, "사회서비스 품질관리체계의 해외 동향 및 개혁방안" 한국사회복지정책학회 36 (36): 237-261, 2009

    10 이봉주, "사회서비스 품질관리 전담기구 설치에 관한 연구" 보건복지부·서울대학교 산학협력단·서울대학교 사회복지연구소 2012

    11 김은정, "사회서비스 재정지원방식의 변화와 품질관리를 위한 정책 과제" 한국사회복지정책학회 35 (35): 141-168, 2008

    12 선우덕, "노인장기요양서비스의 질 관리체계 개선방안" 한국보건사회연구원 2013

    13 畑本裕介, "社会福祉行政の今後 -〈社会保険〉化と行政空間の変化" 7 : 17-29, 2012

    14 村上貴美子, "占領期の福祉政策" 勁草書房 1987

    15 北場勉, "前後「措置制度」の成立と変容" 法律文化社 2005

    16 Socialstyrelsen, "The national board of health and welfare"

    17 Eika, K. H, "The challenge of obtaining quality care: limited consumer sovereignty in human services" 15 (15): 113-137, 2009

    18 Socialstyrelsen, "The Social Services Act (Socialtjänstlagen) - What are your rights after 1 January 2002?"

    19 Department of Health, "The Care Standards Act 2000: A guide for registered service providers"

    20 Department of Health and Human Services, "The Affordable Care Act for Americans with Disabilities"

    21 NCQA, "States using NCQA accreditation for medicaid plans" 2010

    22 Kalyani M., "Social work in the Singapore context" Pearson Education South Asia 2011

    23 Swedish Government Offices, "Social services in Sweden"

    24 Rostgaard, T., "Quality reforms in Danish home care: balancing between standardization and individualization" 20 (20): 247-254, 2012

    25 Megivern, D., "Quality of care: expanding the social work dialogue" 52 (52): 115-124, 2007

    26 Sorenson, C, "Quality measurement and assurance of long-term care for older people" 9 (9): 1-8, 2007

    27 Interlinks, "Quality management and quality assurance in long-term care: European overview paper" 2010

    28 Hafford-Letchfield, "Practising quality assurance in social care" Learning Matters 2007

    29 NCQA, "NCQA medicaid managed care toolkit: 2010. health plan accreditation standards"

    30 Malley, J, "Measuring quality in social care services: theory and practice" 81 (81): 559-582, 2010

    31 Bergström, M., "Managing quality within the Swedish social services: the uses and obstacles to evaluating outcomes" 8 (8): 388-402, 2002

    32 The Danish National Centre for Social Research, "LIVINDHOME, Living independently at home: reforms in home care in 9 European countries" 2011

    33 Care Quality Commission, "Judgement framework: how we judge provider's compliance with the section 20 Regulations of the Health and Social Care Act 2008"

    34 "IVO(Inspektionen for vård och omsorg, The Health and Social Care Inspectorate)"

    35 Ng, I., "How unique and sustainable is the Singapore welfare model?: evaluating welfare statism in Singapore in historical and comparative context" University of Michigan 2004

    36 WHO, "Home care across Europe: case studies" 2013

    37 Harrington, C., "Home and community-based services: public policies to improve access, costs, and quality" PAS Center for Personal Assistance Services 2009

    38 Center for Personal Assistance Services, "Home and community based service costs and quality: research brief" 2012

    39 OECD, "Help wanted? providing and paying for long-term care" 2011

    40 Department of Health and Human Services, "HIPAA Administrative simplification: standard unique health identifier for health care provider"

    41 Ministry of Manpower, "Foreign workforce number 2011" Singapore 2011

    42 Watson, L. D., "Factors influencing the relationship between contract providers and a state funding agency" 36 : 343-358, 2012

    43 Gilbert, N., "Balancing Pluralism: New welfare mixes in care for the elderly" Ashgate Publishing 1993

    44 Care Quality Commission, "Annual report and accounts 2011/12" 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.77 1.77 1.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.86 2.025 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼