RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    이민행정법의 최근 쟁점 불법체류통제와 사인의 역할 -미국 이민법상 고용주 제재와 민사 RICO 소송을 중심으로- = Illegal Immigration Control and the Role of Private Sector -Employer Sanction and Civil RICO Suit of U.S. Immigration Law-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99960981

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Traditionally, border controls have been the government`s proper duty, in that investigation, detention, and deportation process of the illegal immigrant is designed to be governed primarily by public authorities, based on public resources. But under the concept of immigration governance, a new mechanism of achieving regulatory goals of immigration laws has been proposed, especially that of re-allocating rights and duties between public and private sector. For example, U.S. federal, state, and local immigration legislations has adopted employer sanctions clauses, which make it a duty of employer to verify the eligibility of a job seeker and sanction the employer who hire unauthorised aliens. Likewise, landlords and transportation service providers are required not to rent a residence unit or give transportation service to the tenants or passengers who stay in U.S. against the law. If they fail, they will face civil and criminal penalties. Furthermore, private individual who can prove that he or she is suffering loss in business or property by reason of the employment of illegal workers which is the substantive RICO violation can get damages from the employer through the civil RICO suit. In this way, private parties such as employers, landlords, and public carriers are called upon to achieve the regulatory objectives of immigration laws. But the constant rise of the number of the undocumented workers in the U.S. has been analysed to disproves the effectiveness of the employer sanction clauses. Additionally, various professionals agree that private enforcement mechanism of immigration law in the context of civil RICO suit could work under the unique American adversarial legalism. In this respect, system coherence as well as cost and benefit of enhancing the role of private sector in immigration law should be closely analysed before that kind of enhancement is adopted and designed into our immigration legislations.
    번역하기

    Traditionally, border controls have been the government`s proper duty, in that investigation, detention, and deportation process of the illegal immigrant is designed to be governed primarily by public authorities, based on public resources. But under ...

    Traditionally, border controls have been the government`s proper duty, in that investigation, detention, and deportation process of the illegal immigrant is designed to be governed primarily by public authorities, based on public resources. But under the concept of immigration governance, a new mechanism of achieving regulatory goals of immigration laws has been proposed, especially that of re-allocating rights and duties between public and private sector. For example, U.S. federal, state, and local immigration legislations has adopted employer sanctions clauses, which make it a duty of employer to verify the eligibility of a job seeker and sanction the employer who hire unauthorised aliens. Likewise, landlords and transportation service providers are required not to rent a residence unit or give transportation service to the tenants or passengers who stay in U.S. against the law. If they fail, they will face civil and criminal penalties. Furthermore, private individual who can prove that he or she is suffering loss in business or property by reason of the employment of illegal workers which is the substantive RICO violation can get damages from the employer through the civil RICO suit. In this way, private parties such as employers, landlords, and public carriers are called upon to achieve the regulatory objectives of immigration laws. But the constant rise of the number of the undocumented workers in the U.S. has been analysed to disproves the effectiveness of the employer sanction clauses. Additionally, various professionals agree that private enforcement mechanism of immigration law in the context of civil RICO suit could work under the unique American adversarial legalism. In this respect, system coherence as well as cost and benefit of enhancing the role of private sector in immigration law should be closely analysed before that kind of enhancement is adopted and designed into our immigration legislations.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼