RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    전략환경평가를 통한 환경영향평가의 개선방향에 관한 연구-대안적 환경평가모형: APEMI IA MODEL의 제안 = A Study on Improvement of Environmental Impact Assessment using Strategic Environmental Assessment- Alternative Environmental Assessment Model: APEMI IA MODEL

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104900304

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has strengthened and extended the value of environmental impact assessment(EIA) as a foundation tool for sustainable development. In particular, SEA helps to overcome the limitation of EIA as a 'stand alone' approach, applied relatively late stage of the decision making cycle. SEA is applied to policy, plan and programme(3p) proposals, when major alternatives are open and systematic consideration can be given to their environmental effects. This process also corresponds to appraisal of options to find the best practical outcome with regard to all potential impacts.There are imperatives for sustainable development that are shaping future directions for EIA and SEA internationally, regionally and locally. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches of using EIA and SEA as sustainability tools in cooperated environmental management system (EMS). Korea has EIA system and prior environmental review system (PERS) which is different type of SEA as environment assessment (EA)system.We proposed the APEMI IA MODEL for alternative EA system. APEMI IA MODEL integrated following three pillar. First pillar symbolized decision making cycle with planning process. Second pillar symbolized integrated assessment which combine SEA and EIA with specific impacts assessment (eg: social impact assessment, economic impact assessment, health impact assessment etc) in cooperated EMS. Third pillar symbolized EA best practical procedure of international association for impact assessment(IAIA). A case study was performed in order to apply APEMI IA MODEL, taking reclamation 3p for the Samangeum Reclamation project. Study results showed that APEMI IA MODEL was acceptable in existing EA model.
    번역하기

    The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has strengthened and extended the value of environmental impact assessment(EIA) as a foundation tool for sustainable development. In particular, SEA helps to overcome the limitation of EIA a...

    The introduction of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) has strengthened and extended the value of environmental impact assessment(EIA) as a foundation tool for sustainable development. In particular, SEA helps to overcome the limitation of EIA as a 'stand alone' approach, applied relatively late stage of the decision making cycle. SEA is applied to policy, plan and programme(3p) proposals, when major alternatives are open and systematic consideration can be given to their environmental effects. This process also corresponds to appraisal of options to find the best practical outcome with regard to all potential impacts.There are imperatives for sustainable development that are shaping future directions for EIA and SEA internationally, regionally and locally. There is a shift toward more integrative approaches of using EIA and SEA as sustainability tools in cooperated environmental management system (EMS). Korea has EIA system and prior environmental review system (PERS) which is different type of SEA as environment assessment (EA)system.We proposed the APEMI IA MODEL for alternative EA system. APEMI IA MODEL integrated following three pillar. First pillar symbolized decision making cycle with planning process. Second pillar symbolized integrated assessment which combine SEA and EIA with specific impacts assessment (eg: social impact assessment, economic impact assessment, health impact assessment etc) in cooperated EMS. Third pillar symbolized EA best practical procedure of international association for impact assessment(IAIA). A case study was performed in order to apply APEMI IA MODEL, taking reclamation 3p for the Samangeum Reclamation project. Study results showed that APEMI IA MODEL was acceptable in existing EA model.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정연만, "환경영향평가제도의 발전방향" 39-46, 2003

    2 김임순, "환경관리?: 도서출판 동화기술," 207-279, 2002

    3 한상욱, "지속가능한 개발과 전략환경평가" 1999

    4 성현찬, "전략환경평가 모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구" 1997

    5 한상욱, "전략적 환경평가: 현재와 미래」, ?2003년도 한국환경정책학회 정기총회 및 학술대회자료집" 9-49, 2003

    6 김은식, "국책개발사업 새만금간척개발사업 과 환경영향평가 공공 사업 추진절차의 재정립과 전략환경평가 제도도입" 3-24, 2001

    7 황희연, "국가균형발전정책과 환경정책방향" 139-160, 2003pp

    8 김광임, "개발사업의 환경 분쟁 예방을 위한 정책 결정체계 정비방안" 85-105, 2003pp

    9 Riki, "Therivel and Maria Rosario Partidario, The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment" Earthscan Publications Ltd 3-44, 1996

    10 IAIA, "The linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions" 1-12, 2002

    1 정연만, "환경영향평가제도의 발전방향" 39-46, 2003

    2 김임순, "환경관리?: 도서출판 동화기술," 207-279, 2002

    3 한상욱, "지속가능한 개발과 전략환경평가" 1999

    4 성현찬, "전략환경평가 모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구" 1997

    5 한상욱, "전략적 환경평가: 현재와 미래」, ?2003년도 한국환경정책학회 정기총회 및 학술대회자료집" 9-49, 2003

    6 김은식, "국책개발사업 새만금간척개발사업 과 환경영향평가 공공 사업 추진절차의 재정립과 전략환경평가 제도도입" 3-24, 2001

    7 황희연, "국가균형발전정책과 환경정책방향" 139-160, 2003pp

    8 김광임, "개발사업의 환경 분쟁 예방을 위한 정책 결정체계 정비방안" 85-105, 2003pp

    9 Riki, "Therivel and Maria Rosario Partidario, The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment" Earthscan Publications Ltd 3-44, 1996

    10 IAIA, "The linkages between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendations for Actions" 1-12, 2002

    11 Riki,, "The Theriver and Phillip Minas"Ensuring Effective Sustainability Appraisal" 21 (21): 1461-5517, 2003

    12 US. CEQ, "The National Environmental Policy Act" 1-47, 1997

    13 IAIA, "Strategic Environmental Assessment, Performance Criteria" 1 : 1-, 2002

    14 Maria Rosário Partidário, "Strategic Environmental Assessment(SEA) Current Practices, Future Demands and Capacity-Building needs" 22-41, 2003

    15 World Bank, "Strategic Environmental Assessment in world Bank Operations : Experience to Date-Future Potential, 2002" World Bank 1-51, 2002

    16 EnvironmentCanada, "Strategic Environmental Assessment at Environment Canada" 2003

    17 Barry Sadler, "Static Challenge and Future Directions:" 1996

    18 ICON, "SEA and International of the Environment into Strategic Decision Making Final Report(Executive Summary 2001" 2001

    19 United Nations, "Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg" 1-167,

    20 UNECE, "Protocol on Strategic Environmental Assessment" 1-14, 2003

    21 IAIA, "Principes of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice" 1-4, 1999

    22 Barry Sadler, "Overview of International Trends and Developments Strategic Environmental Assessment the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and The Chinese University of Hong Kong"" 2002

    23 "Ministry of the Environment" 2-37, 2003

    24 Barry Sadler, "International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. Final Report" 139-182, 1996

    25 IAIA, "International Principles for Social Impact Assessment" 2 : 1-8, 2003

    26 Barry Sadler, "Institute of Environmental Assessment, Environmental Assessment and Human Health" 3-51, 1997

    27 World Bank, "Health and Environment, Environment Strategy Papers" World Bank 2001

    28 WHO, "Health Impact Assessment in Development Policy and Planing" 5-23, 2001

    29 Munn, "Evironmental Impact Assessment" 85-89, 1978

    30 Cristopher Wood, "Environmental Impact Assessment:" 270-272, 1995

    31 Larry W, "Environmental Impact Assessement: McGraw-Hill" 8-, 1996

    32 UNEP, "EIA Training Resource Manual" 410-545, 2002

    33 "Commission for Environmental Impact Assessment New experience on EIA in the Netherlands" 11-55, 1998

    34 UNDP, "Benefits of a Strategic Environmental Assessment" 1-5, 2003

    35 아태환경경영연구원, "?환경친화적경영전략?" 136-147, 1996

    36 김임순, "?최신환경영향평가?" 도서출판 동화기술 19-139, 2003

    37 한국환경정책, "?사전 환경성 검토제도의 개선방안?" 평가연구원 89-141, 2002

    38 감사원, "?경인운하건설사업추진실태?" 1-6, 2003

    39 지구환경대책기획단, "?21세기 지구환경 실천 강령 - 리우 지구환경의 문서 국문본?" 5 116-12 138, 1992

    40 Luis Enrique Sanchez, ""An Approach to Linking Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Systems" 20 (20): 25-38, 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2016-03-02 통합 KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.79
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.71 0.67 0.964 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼