RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      역행성 치직장근 수축증의 진단에 근전도, 영상 배변 조영술 및 대장 지연성 운동 측정법의 유용성 = Correlation of Electromyography, Cinedefecography, and Colonic Transit Study in the Diagnosis of Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19640147

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      There is no confirmative study in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Electromyography, cinedefecography, and colonic transit study are main tests used in the diagnosis of this disease. However, we don't know the positive probability of these tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the positive probability of each tests in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction.
      Between 1991 and 1997, 412 patients were tested due to constipation. 142 patients were diagnosed as paradoxical puborectalis contraction by anorectal physiology tests such as electromyography, cinedefecography, and colonic transit study. We calculated positive probability rates of each tests, and also calculated double positive probability of tests, and then compared the significance of results.
      Positive probability rates of three tests were 62.3% in electromyography, 38.0% in colonic transit study, and 74.8% in cinedefecography; these results were significant bye chi-square test(p〈0.01). Positive probability rate was significantly high in cinedefecography (p〈0.001), and significantly low in colonic transit study (p〈0.001), but no significant in electromyography (p=0.56). When electromyography was positive, double positive probability of cinedefecography was 63.9%, and colonic transit study 25% (p〈0.001). When colonic transit study was positive, double positive probability of cinedefecography was 66.7%, and electromyography 40.0% (p〈0.05). When cinedefecography was positive, double positive probability of electromyography was 52.7%, and colonic transit study 33.3%(p〈0.05). Only 6 patients (4.2%) showed triple positive probability rate.
      Cinedefecography has the most probability rate in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, and colonic transit study has the least probability. In paradoxical puborectalis contraction, when electromyography or colonic transit study is positive, it would be better confirm the result of cinedefecography, and when cinedefecography is positive, the result of electromyography is important. However, combination of these three tests is suggested in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction because of relatively suboptimal probability rates of these tests.
      번역하기

      There is no confirmative study in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Electromyography, cinedefecography, and colonic transit study are main tests used in the diagnosis of this disease. However, we don't know the positive probabilit...

      There is no confirmative study in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Electromyography, cinedefecography, and colonic transit study are main tests used in the diagnosis of this disease. However, we don't know the positive probability of these tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the positive probability of each tests in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction.
      Between 1991 and 1997, 412 patients were tested due to constipation. 142 patients were diagnosed as paradoxical puborectalis contraction by anorectal physiology tests such as electromyography, cinedefecography, and colonic transit study. We calculated positive probability rates of each tests, and also calculated double positive probability of tests, and then compared the significance of results.
      Positive probability rates of three tests were 62.3% in electromyography, 38.0% in colonic transit study, and 74.8% in cinedefecography; these results were significant bye chi-square test(p〈0.01). Positive probability rate was significantly high in cinedefecography (p〈0.001), and significantly low in colonic transit study (p〈0.001), but no significant in electromyography (p=0.56). When electromyography was positive, double positive probability of cinedefecography was 63.9%, and colonic transit study 25% (p〈0.001). When colonic transit study was positive, double positive probability of cinedefecography was 66.7%, and electromyography 40.0% (p〈0.05). When cinedefecography was positive, double positive probability of electromyography was 52.7%, and colonic transit study 33.3%(p〈0.05). Only 6 patients (4.2%) showed triple positive probability rate.
      Cinedefecography has the most probability rate in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction, and colonic transit study has the least probability. In paradoxical puborectalis contraction, when electromyography or colonic transit study is positive, it would be better confirm the result of cinedefecography, and when cinedefecography is positive, the result of electromyography is important. However, combination of these three tests is suggested in the diagnosis of paradoxical puborectalis contraction because of relatively suboptimal probability rates of these tests.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼