고교학점제 도입에 따른 최소 성취수준 보장 지도 운영에 대한 교원 및 전문가 인식 분석: 강원특별시자치도교육청 사례를 중심으로 = An Analysis of Teachers' and Experts' Perceptions of Guidelines for Guaranteeing Minimum Achievement Level Following the Introduction of High School Credit System: Focusing on the Case of Gangwon Metropolitan City Self-Governing Provincial Office of Educ

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives This study is expected to face many difficulties in operating guidance that guarantees the minimum level of achievement following the introduction of the high school credit system, so it seeks to listen to the opinions of teachers and experts, focusing on the case of the Gangwon Special Self-Governing Provincial Office of Education, and propose support measures to prevent failure to reach the minimum level of achievement.
Methods To this end, in-depth interviews (2023. 4. - 2023. 6.) was carried out. The questions of the in-depth interview consisted of the suitability of the purpose of preventive guidance to guarantee the minimum level of achievement, differences in teachers' perceptions and practices, the actual state of operation and impediments, and the performance of suitable operation plans and policies.
Results Through interview analysis on the cases of the Gangwon-do Office of Education’s guidance for guaranteeing the minimum achievement level of the high school credit system, the results were analyzed from five aspects: (1) perception, (2) practice, (3) class, (4) evaluation, and (5) environment. Opinions were understood. In addition, implications were drawn by analyzing the current status of guidance for guaranteeing the minimum achievement level of the high school credit system of other city and provincial offices of education, and cases of prevention and supplementary guidance for guaranteeing the minimum achievement level for research and preparation schools at the Gangwon Metropolitan Autonomous Office of Education.
Conclusions Firstly, as reviewed in the 2022 achievement evaluation results of high schools (107 schools) of the Gangwon-do Office of Education, it was confirmed that more than 40% of the students had academic achievement E. Secondly, as a result of analyzing the operational tasks of research schools and preparatory schools of other city/provincial offices of education and the Gangwon Metropolitan Autonomous Provincial Office of Education and identifying their characteristics, the main factors were methods of selecting low-achieving students, after-school operation of non-attainment prevention guidance, and emotional support programs. Thirdly, measures to improve and support classes and assessments were proposed to have the subject competencies presented in the 2015 revised curriculum based on everyday life and familiar subjects, rather than just achieving the quantitative goal of the subject to reach the minimum achievement level.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 홍후조, "학교 교육과정, 수업, 평가의 진단과개선방향: 학습 격차 축소와 학습 상향 발전" 195-217, 2021

2 교육부, "포용과 성장 구현을 위한 고교학점제 종합 추진계획"

3 Tashakkori, A., "통합연구방법론: 질적⋅양적 접근방법의 통합" 학지사 2001

4 교육부, "최소 성취수준 보장 지도 운영 매뉴얼: 국어" 2022

5 조용, "소규모학교의 고교학점제에 대한 교원 및 전문가 인식 분석: G 교육청의 사례를 중심으로" 학습자중심교과교육학회 23 (23): 291-312, 2023

6 민인경, "소규모학교고교학점제 운영 방안: 공동교육과정 중심으로" 강원교육 2022

7 법제처, "기초학력 보장법 시행령"

8 정범모, "교육의 향방" 교육과학사 2017

9 손영환, "교육과 복지를 위한 연구방법론" 동문사 2011

10 교육부, "고교학점제의 성취평가제와 책임교육을 논하다"

11 교육부, "고교학점제 추진 방향 및 연구학교 운영 계획"

12 교육부, "고교학점제 운영"

13 김진숙, "고교학점제 도입을 위한 고등학교 교육과정 개선 및 대입제도 개편 방향" 한국교육과정평가원 2021

14 박혜영, "고교학점제 도입에 따른 성취평가제 개선 방안" 한국교육과정평가원 2022

15 노은희, "고교학점제 도입에 따른 고등학교 교과 이수 기준 설정 방안 탐색" 한국교육과정평가원 2019

16 한국교육신문, "<미국> 아동낙오방지법, 학생성취법으로 바뀌나"

17 교육부, "2023학년도 학교생활기록부 기재요령(고등학교)"

18 강원특별자치도교육청, "2023 주요업무계획"

19 교육부, "2022 개정 교육과정 총론 주요사항 발표"

20 교육부, "2022 개정 고등학교 교육과정"

21 교육부, "2015년 일반계고 학점제 전면 적용을 위한 고교학점제 단계적 이행 계획 발표"