RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Personal and school factors influencing academic success or underachievement of intellectually gifted students in middle childhood.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10550757

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study identified inter- and intrapersonal issues that differentiated intellectually gifted elementary students (IQ ≥ 130, N = 90, <italic>M </italic> = 10.3) achieving at different levels academically (high, below expectations, and below average). Teachers assessed students' interpersonal and motivational functioning (EZ-Yale Personality-Motivational Questionnaire) and emotional and behavioral adjustment (Conners' Teacher Rating Scales-39). Students characterized their self-concepts and values (Harter Self-Perception Profile and Competence/Importance Discrepancy Scale) and goals (Personal Projects Analysis Scale). PCA indicated that teachers evaluated gifted students on three criteria, academic challenge seeking, and social and emotional adjustment. Teachers characterized high achieving students as high functioning on all criteria, students performing below expectations as socially anxious and lacking in academic initiative, and students performing below average as socially anxious, academically disengaged, and emotionally maladjusted. Among high achieving children, boys reported more learning goals and girls reported more positive performance goals. Among children performing below expectations for the gifted, boys reported more positive non-academic interests and experiences, and felt more scholastically competent than did girls, who reported more defensive performance goals. Children performing below average academically reported self-concepts and goals consistent with internalized distress and depression.
    번역하기

    This study identified inter- and intrapersonal issues that differentiated intellectually gifted elementary students (IQ ≥ 130, N = 90, <italic>M </italic> = 10.3) achieving at different levels academically (high, below expectations, an...

    This study identified inter- and intrapersonal issues that differentiated intellectually gifted elementary students (IQ ≥ 130, N = 90, <italic>M </italic> = 10.3) achieving at different levels academically (high, below expectations, and below average). Teachers assessed students' interpersonal and motivational functioning (EZ-Yale Personality-Motivational Questionnaire) and emotional and behavioral adjustment (Conners' Teacher Rating Scales-39). Students characterized their self-concepts and values (Harter Self-Perception Profile and Competence/Importance Discrepancy Scale) and goals (Personal Projects Analysis Scale). PCA indicated that teachers evaluated gifted students on three criteria, academic challenge seeking, and social and emotional adjustment. Teachers characterized high achieving students as high functioning on all criteria, students performing below expectations as socially anxious and lacking in academic initiative, and students performing below average as socially anxious, academically disengaged, and emotionally maladjusted. Among high achieving children, boys reported more learning goals and girls reported more positive performance goals. Among children performing below expectations for the gifted, boys reported more positive non-academic interests and experiences, and felt more scholastically competent than did girls, who reported more defensive performance goals. Children performing below average academically reported self-concepts and goals consistent with internalized distress and depression.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼