여백의 역설적 발언 -김종삼 시의 근저 = The Paradoxical Utterance of Empty Space -The Foundation of Kim, Jong-sam`s Poems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Kim, Jong-sam`s poems are placed within the scars and memories of war. Kim, however, could not directly express this because he could not escape the war laden streets. Kim, in the context of outrages of war, expresses poetry as if to stutter or to experience language loss, or express his feelings with incongruent words. For such reasons, the academic and literary circles` predominant consensus is that Kim is a moderate, a classicist, or an aestheticist. I would like to begin my paper by raising skepticism towards such overwhelming consensus. Kim`s poems overflow with the desire to express what is unexpressable. Such inner chaos is rooted in the fear of the world which is generated by war. He was an un-prolific poet in that he did not produce many works and of the few most were short. He wandered in the land of silence. In his poetry, the silence is expressed as empty space. The poet was overly frugal with words. Words were replaced with empty spaces. They filled the places where words did not. The emptiness manifests as a desolate space. His is unlike that of Lao-tzu and Zhuangzi or Dhyana. He is not concerned with the transcendent. It seems that a psychological mutism towards fear and violence played a major part in Kim`s manifesting reality in his work. The poet was imprisoned in a world of not-speaking(or rather unable to speak), in other words in a world of speaking in silence. Nevertheless, the afflictions of an unfortunate era pours out from the depths of his soul in the language of poetry. The things he could not express directly comes alive from the hidden side of his work. The rejection of objects or the world created fear. His poems are apprehensive attempts at starting a conversation with the world he rejected. In this regard, readers are able to share the historic scars with the poet, providing solace for the broken past. On the other hand, however, his confined language is a barrier to his work. The short length and convoluted content of his poetry causes obstruction to communication.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김재홍, "한국전쟁과 현대시의 응전력" 평민사 1978

2 조재훈, "한국 현대시의 숲과 나무" 이회 2002

3 김용희, "한국 현대 시어의 탄생" 소명출판 2009

4 권명옥, "적막의 미학- 김종삼의 ｢북치는 소년｣, ｢돌각담｣, ｢라산스카｣" 한국현대문예비평학회 (15) : 7-34, 2004

5 강석경, "일하는 예술가들" 열화당 1991

6 최인훈, "역사와 상상력" 민음사 1976

7 Wolfgang Kayser, "언어 예술작품론" 대방출판사 1982

8 김종삼, "스와니江이랑 요단江이랑" 미래사 1991

9 김영미, "선시 ․ 하이쿠 ․ 한국현대시" 48-56, 2012

10 이승훈, "분단의식의 한 양상-김종삼의 경우" 205-228, 1979

11 염무웅, "민중시대의 문학" 창작과비평사 1979

12 조재훈, "동양시학 Ⅰ․Ⅱ" (여름,가을) : 2010

13 김준오, "도시시와 해체시" 문학과비평사 1992

14 이민호, "김종삼의 시적 상상력과 텍스트성" 보고사 2004

15 최명표, "김종삼시연구" 한국언어문학회 (49) : 493-513, 2002

16 권명옥, "김종삼 전집" 나남 2011

17 장석주, "김종삼 전집" 청하 1998

18 김기택, "김종삼 시의 현실 인식 방법의 특성 연구" 한국시학회 (12) : 175-208, 2005

19 이승규, "김종삼 시의 현실 대응 양상 연구" 한국현대문학회 (23) : 457-482, 2007

20 김승희, "김종삼 시의 전위성과 미니멀리즘 시학 연구 - 자아의 감소와 서술의 축소를 중심으로" 국제비교한국학회 16 (16): 195-223, 2008

21 서범석, "김종삼 시의 건너뜀과 빈자리" 문예운동사 (115) : 279-294, 2012

22 박현수, "김종삼 시와 포스트모더니즘의 수사학" 우리말글학회 (31) : 247-272, 2004

23 장동석, "김종삼 시에 나타난 ‘결여’와 무의식적 욕망 연구" 한국현대문예비평학회 (26) : 205-228, 2008

24 김종삼, "[단행본] 십이음계" 삼애사 1969

25 하정일, "50년대 한국문예비평자료집 1~25" 한일문화사 1990

26 류순태, "1950~60년대 김종삼 시의 미의식 연구" 한국현대문 학회 1 : 2001