저작권법상 친고죄 규정의 고찰 = An Study of Offenses Subject to Personal Complaint Provisions in Copyright Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the past, violations of copyright did not cause damage on a large enough scale to be perceived as violations of the copyright holder’s personal rights, and even the violators were not conscious to a high degree of the illegality of their actions. However, as the rate of internet usage grew rapidly in recent years the digital industry has grown to the extent that the importance and property value of digital contents are being widely emphasized, and the economic value has increased as well. The property damage from copyright violation has grown as correspondingly, and such violations have come to be perceived, beyond violations of personal rights, as crimes of pubic concern.
Reflecting these changes, though the Copyright Act has made penalties for crimes of copyright violation offenses subject to personal complaint by the victim, there are now calls to make them offenses not subject to personal complaint. The basis for this argument is that recent violations of copyright, instead of being transitory violations by individuals, are organized and repetitive in nature, and the amount of damage is immense, requiring efficient enforcement and imposition of penalties. There are further demands that copyright violations not be subject to personal complaint following the conclusion of FTAs with the EU and the United States. The practice of a few law firms, charged with settlement from copyright holders, abusing criminal complaints to extract settlements from copyright violators who fear a criminal record, also gives weight to abolishing the subjectivity to complaint principle in the Copyright Act.
In response, this paper discusses whether to maintain or abolish the offense subjective to complaint principle in the Copyright Act, then examines each penalty provision in the Act to determine whether or not to it should be an offense subject to personal complaint. As a precondition to resolving the problems discussed herein, we also review the reasons the Copyright Act established the offense subject to personal complaint principle in relation to the characteristics of copyright protection.
Copyright works, beyond being a subject of the copyright holder’s personal rights, has a public aspect in forming and developing human culture through the public’s use of such works and the resulting changes in ideas and opinions and the creation of new works. Therefore, the principle of offense subject to personal complaint is appropriate so that criminal penalties only apply when the copyright holder brings a criminal complaint with the intent to have such penalties applied, and not otherwise. However, the act of repeatedly violating copyright for the purpose of profit constitutes the acquisition by a third party of the economic benefit that the copyright holder is entitled to, when this third party contributed nothing to the creation of the copyright work. The policy considerations of cultural development behind making copyright violations offenses subject to personal complaint have no application to this latter case. We therefore conclude that the amended Act is correct in penalizing repeated violations of copyright for the purpose of profit regardless of the copyright holder’s bringing a complaint.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 저작권보호의 특성과 친고죄원칙
• Ⅲ. 저작권법상 친고죄 규정의 개별적 검토
• Ⅳ. 현행 친고죄규정의 문제점과 개선방안
• Ⅴ. 결론
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신동운, "형법총론 제5판" 법문사 74-, 2010

2 정성근, "형법총론" 삼지원 73-, 2011

3 이재상, "형법총론" 박영사 71-, 2011

4 박달현, "친고죄와 고소불가분의 원칙 - 그 문제점 및 개선방향" 385-395,

5 김선복, "친고죄에 대한 고찰" (10) : 159-, 1998

6 이용우, "지적재산권법상의 침해죄와 관련한 친고죄 조항의 재검토, in 지적재산권" 15-19, 2004

7 박준석, "지적재산권법" 홍문사 507-, 2011

8 민형기, "지적소유권의 형사적 보호, in 지적재산권에 관한 제문제(하)" 법원행정처 57 : 243-244, 1992

9 "전자신문 2011년 2월 17일 기사"

10 탁희성, "저작권침해에 대한 형사적 보호의 현황과 개선방안" 한국형사정책연구원 36-, 2009

11 김정환, "저작권법상 범죄의 비친고죄화에 대한 형사법적 검토" 한국산업재산권법학회 (23) : 241-276, 2007

12 남형두, "저작권법 주해" 박영사 1357-, 2007

13 우상호, "저작권법 개정안 쟁점조항에 대한 이해, in 지적재산권법" 31-, 2006

14 최경수, "저작권법 개설" 한울아카데미 715-, 2011

15 "연합뉴스 2010년 1월 18일 기사"

16 정승환, "신형사소송법" 홍문사 348-, 2008

17 허희성, "신저작권축조개설 하권" 저작권아카데미 351-, 2000

18 "보안뉴스 2010년 10월 1일 기사"

19 안효질, "각국의 소프트웨어 불법복제 방지대책에 관한 연구" 160-, 2001

20 이상정, "SW저작권과 관련한 친고죄와 단속권에 관한 연구" 101-, 2001

21 "2010년 범죄백서"