RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    6ㆍ25전쟁 휴전협상 중 남한출신 의용군문제 누락 배경과 해결 방안 = Background of the Volunteer Soldiers of South Korean Orign mobilized by North Korea Left Out at the Armistice Negotiation and its Solution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892341

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper seeks to find out the history and scale of ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ mobilized by north Korea while the war was going on, how they were dealt with at the armistice table and what efforts were made to get them as well as to resolve the matter after the cease fire. When the Korean War abductees are talked about, it is not unusual that people often think only of social leaders such as political leaders, scholars, rightist movement leaders, etc. A good part of the abductees, however, were “Volunteer Soldiers” of South Korean-origin. For instance, according to the abductees’ list prepared by the then Ministry of Home Affairs in late 1951, which lists some 126,000, about 90,000 of them were ‘Volunteer Soldiers.’ “Volunteer Soldiers” were often excluded from the lists of abductees prepared either by the abductees’ family group or the government as they had been classified as students, youth group members, etc. While it may be proper to exclude those who were captured as prisoners of war by the Republic of Korea(ROK) and United Nations(UN) troops, interned in the Koje Prisoners of war(POW) camp and released in 1952, and those who, at their own will, chose North Korea after the cease fire, it is unfair to exclude from the category of kidnapped those who were forcibly taken into the NK army as they also were victims of the war. While the important civilians were abducted according to NK’s premeditated plan while NK army occupied Seoul, most of the ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ were taken from South Korea and placed to the frontline against their will. NK, however, has never admitted their being, claiming that they have only ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ or those who opted NK because they had become disillusioned with South Korea. It is a big tragedy that not even the fate of those taken away during the war, now some 60 years have gone by, is still unaccounted for. The very first thing we have to do is finding their fate, the dire and cherished desire of their families.
    번역하기

    This paper seeks to find out the history and scale of ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ mobilized by north Korea while the war was going on, how they were dealt with at the armistice table and what efforts were made to get them as well as to resolve the matter...

    This paper seeks to find out the history and scale of ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ mobilized by north Korea while the war was going on, how they were dealt with at the armistice table and what efforts were made to get them as well as to resolve the matter after the cease fire. When the Korean War abductees are talked about, it is not unusual that people often think only of social leaders such as political leaders, scholars, rightist movement leaders, etc. A good part of the abductees, however, were “Volunteer Soldiers” of South Korean-origin. For instance, according to the abductees’ list prepared by the then Ministry of Home Affairs in late 1951, which lists some 126,000, about 90,000 of them were ‘Volunteer Soldiers.’ “Volunteer Soldiers” were often excluded from the lists of abductees prepared either by the abductees’ family group or the government as they had been classified as students, youth group members, etc. While it may be proper to exclude those who were captured as prisoners of war by the Republic of Korea(ROK) and United Nations(UN) troops, interned in the Koje Prisoners of war(POW) camp and released in 1952, and those who, at their own will, chose North Korea after the cease fire, it is unfair to exclude from the category of kidnapped those who were forcibly taken into the NK army as they also were victims of the war. While the important civilians were abducted according to NK’s premeditated plan while NK army occupied Seoul, most of the ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ were taken from South Korea and placed to the frontline against their will. NK, however, has never admitted their being, claiming that they have only ‘Volunteer Soldiers’ or those who opted NK because they had become disillusioned with South Korea. It is a big tragedy that not even the fate of those taken away during the war, now some 60 years have gone by, is still unaccounted for. The very first thing we have to do is finding their fate, the dire and cherished desire of their families.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "해방직후 극비자료 6" 고려서림 1998

    2 조성훈, "한국전쟁중 민간인억류자의 처리에 관한 연구" 32 : 1996

    3 "한국전쟁시 피랍치인 명부관계"

    4 한국전쟁납북사건자료원, "한국전쟁납북사건사료집 1-2" 2009

    5 정병준, "한국전쟁기 남한 민간인 인명피해 조사의 유형과 특징-한국정부의 통계 · 명부를 중심으로-" 한국문화연구원 14 : 133-171, 2008

    6 조성훈, "한국전쟁과 포로" 선인 2010

    7 예관수, "한국의 동란" 병학연구사 1950

    8 김용욱, "한국역사에 있어 전쟁피로자.피납자의 송환문제: 임진.정유왜란, 정묘.병자호란, 6.25전쟁의 사례를 중심으로" 한국국제정치학회 44 (44): 117-140, 2004

    9 한국 홍보협회, "한국동란" 1973

    10 조 철, "죽음의 세월" 성봉각 1964

    1 "해방직후 극비자료 6" 고려서림 1998

    2 조성훈, "한국전쟁중 민간인억류자의 처리에 관한 연구" 32 : 1996

    3 "한국전쟁시 피랍치인 명부관계"

    4 한국전쟁납북사건자료원, "한국전쟁납북사건사료집 1-2" 2009

    5 정병준, "한국전쟁기 남한 민간인 인명피해 조사의 유형과 특징-한국정부의 통계 · 명부를 중심으로-" 한국문화연구원 14 : 133-171, 2008

    6 조성훈, "한국전쟁과 포로" 선인 2010

    7 예관수, "한국의 동란" 병학연구사 1950

    8 김용욱, "한국역사에 있어 전쟁피로자.피납자의 송환문제: 임진.정유왜란, 정묘.병자호란, 6.25전쟁의 사례를 중심으로" 한국국제정치학회 44 (44): 117-140, 2004

    9 한국 홍보협회, "한국동란" 1973

    10 조 철, "죽음의 세월" 성봉각 1964

    11 "조선일보"

    12 "조선인민보"

    13 양진삼, "전쟁기 중국지도부와 북한지도부 사이의 모순과 갈등"

    14 이범선, "적치하 90일"

    15 "자유신문"

    16 허영철, "역사는 한 번도 나를 비껴가지 않았다" 보리 2006

    17 김성칠, "역사 앞에서:한 사학자의 6․25일기" 창작과비평사 1993

    18 "소련 군사고문단장 라주바예프의 6․25전쟁 보고서 3" 군사편찬연구소 2001

    19 중앙일보사, "민족의 증언 2"

    20 "로동신문"

    21 박종효, "러시아연방 외무성 대한정책 자료 II" 선인출판사 2010

    22 "동아일보"

    23 박일준, "너와 나는 총부리를 맞댈 수 없다" 청년생활 5-, 1957

    24 윤여상, "납북자 실태와 해결방안" 평화문제연구소 37 (37): 283-313, 2002

    25 프레스센터, "납북문제의 기원․확산․해결" 2010

    26 배경식, "남한지역에서의 북한의 전시동원" 군사편찬연구소 2 : 2002

    27 이 태, "남부군 비극의 사령관 이현상" 학원사 1990

    28 김정기, "남부군" 금성문화사 1988

    29 국방정보본부, "군사정전위원회편람 2" 1993

    30 "경향신문"

    31 Kim, Ik Chun, "Prisoner of War Preliminary Interrogation Report" 군사편찬연구소 1950

    32 김명호, "6?25전쟁 납북자의 납북동기 분석에 관한 실증적 연구" 한국정책분석평가학회 16 (16): 113-138, 2006

    33 이두아, "6․25전쟁 납북자문제해결에 관한 제언" 현대사회문화연구소 2005

    34 공보처 통계국, "6․25사변중 서울특별시 피해자명부"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼