RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국인의 국민정체성에 대한 인식과 다문화 수용성 = South Koreans` Perceptions of National Identity and Acceptance of Multiculturalism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101892342

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims at analyzing characteristics and types of South Koreans`` perceptions of national identity, measuring acceptance of multiculturalism, and identifying relationships between perceptions of national identity and acceptance of multiculturalism. To analyze South Koreans`` perceptions of national identity, we intersected the ethnic factor of national identity by the civic factor and produced four types: mixed, ethnic, civic, and plural type. To measure the level of acceptance of multiculturalism, we computed mean scores of acceptance of multiculturalism and compared them across the four types of perceptions of national identity. To determine the relationships between the concepts, we measured the independent effect of the type of perceptions of national identity on acceptance of multiculturalism after controlling for other variables. Data for this study came from a sample survey “Survey of South Koreans`` Perceptions of Foreign Migrant Workers and Multicultural Society” conducted in December 2008. Major findings are as follows. Contrary to conventional wisdom that Koreans see ethnicity and nationality the same, Koreans distinguish between the two, and that they consider the civic factor as importantly as the ethnic factor. Also, the most prevalent type of national identity is the mixed type that values both the ethnic and civic factors, followed by the civic factor that values the civic factor more than the ethnic factor. People who hold the mixed type of perceptions show the most exclusive attitudes toward multiculturalism and migrants while people of the plural type factor exhibit the most positive attitudes toward multiculturalism and people of the civic factor are the most tolerant of immigrants. Findings of this research are expected to provide useful implications for enhancing capacity of social integration that pulls common national identity and solidarity between South and North Koreans after the national reunification.
    번역하기

    This study aims at analyzing characteristics and types of South Koreans`` perceptions of national identity, measuring acceptance of multiculturalism, and identifying relationships between perceptions of national identity and acceptance of multicultura...

    This study aims at analyzing characteristics and types of South Koreans`` perceptions of national identity, measuring acceptance of multiculturalism, and identifying relationships between perceptions of national identity and acceptance of multiculturalism. To analyze South Koreans`` perceptions of national identity, we intersected the ethnic factor of national identity by the civic factor and produced four types: mixed, ethnic, civic, and plural type. To measure the level of acceptance of multiculturalism, we computed mean scores of acceptance of multiculturalism and compared them across the four types of perceptions of national identity. To determine the relationships between the concepts, we measured the independent effect of the type of perceptions of national identity on acceptance of multiculturalism after controlling for other variables. Data for this study came from a sample survey “Survey of South Koreans`` Perceptions of Foreign Migrant Workers and Multicultural Society” conducted in December 2008. Major findings are as follows. Contrary to conventional wisdom that Koreans see ethnicity and nationality the same, Koreans distinguish between the two, and that they consider the civic factor as importantly as the ethnic factor. Also, the most prevalent type of national identity is the mixed type that values both the ethnic and civic factors, followed by the civic factor that values the civic factor more than the ethnic factor. People who hold the mixed type of perceptions show the most exclusive attitudes toward multiculturalism and migrants while people of the plural type factor exhibit the most positive attitudes toward multiculturalism and people of the civic factor are the most tolerant of immigrants. Findings of this research are expected to provide useful implications for enhancing capacity of social integration that pulls common national identity and solidarity between South and North Koreans after the national reunification.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 양계민, "한민족정체성과 자민족중심주의가 청소년의 다문화수용성에 미치는 영향*" 한국청소년정책연구원 20 (20): 387-421, 2009

    2 민무숙, "한국형 다문화 수용성 진단도구 개발" 사회통합위원회 2010

    3 김상돈, "한국인의 이주노동자와 다문화사회에 대한 인식" 한국학술정보 2010

    4 윤인진, "한국인의 소수자 및 다문화 관련 태도의 비교분석" 강원대학교 2007

    5 최현, "한국인의 다문화 시티즌십(multicultural citizenship) : 다문화 의식을 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 5 (5): 147-173, 2007

    6 맹진학, "한국인의 다문화 배제 태도에 영향을 주는 결정요인에 관한 다층분석" 한국사회복지정책학회 36 (36): 323-348, 2009

    7 정기선, "한국인의 국가정체성 국제비교연구: 자격요건 평가를 중심으로" 프레스센터 2004

    8 김이선, "한국사회의 수용 현실과 정책과제" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

    9 정명희, "한국사회의 문화 간 감수성이 다문화수용성에 미치는 영향" 국제e-비즈니스학회 11 (11): 291-310, 2010

    10 황정미, "한국사회의 다민족․다문화지향성에 대한 조사연구" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

    1 양계민, "한민족정체성과 자민족중심주의가 청소년의 다문화수용성에 미치는 영향*" 한국청소년정책연구원 20 (20): 387-421, 2009

    2 민무숙, "한국형 다문화 수용성 진단도구 개발" 사회통합위원회 2010

    3 김상돈, "한국인의 이주노동자와 다문화사회에 대한 인식" 한국학술정보 2010

    4 윤인진, "한국인의 소수자 및 다문화 관련 태도의 비교분석" 강원대학교 2007

    5 최현, "한국인의 다문화 시티즌십(multicultural citizenship) : 다문화 의식을 중심으로" 제3섹터연구소 5 (5): 147-173, 2007

    6 맹진학, "한국인의 다문화 배제 태도에 영향을 주는 결정요인에 관한 다층분석" 한국사회복지정책학회 36 (36): 323-348, 2009

    7 정기선, "한국인의 국가정체성 국제비교연구: 자격요건 평가를 중심으로" 프레스센터 2004

    8 김이선, "한국사회의 수용 현실과 정책과제" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

    9 정명희, "한국사회의 문화 간 감수성이 다문화수용성에 미치는 영향" 국제e-비즈니스학회 11 (11): 291-310, 2010

    10 황정미, "한국사회의 다민족․다문화지향성에 대한 조사연구" 한국여성정책연구원 2007

    11 오계택, "이주 노동자에 대한 한국인의 인식: 일터를 중심으로" 한국여성정책연구원, 한국노동연구원 2007

    12 김미진, "아동의 다문화 수용성 척도 개발에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2010

    13 김상학, "소수자 집단에 대한 태도와 사회적 거리감" 5 (5): 2004

    14 전재호, "세계화 시대 한국 정체성의 변화: 국민정체성의 법적 규정과 관련 정책을 중심으로" 신아시아연구소 12 (12): 138-165, 2005

    15 윤인진, "민족문제의 재성찰: 민족주의와 국민정체성" 이화여대 2005

    16 최현, "대한민국과 중화인민공화국의 국민 정체성과 시민권 제도" 한국사회학회 37 (37): 5-172, 2003

    17 장미혜, "다민족․다문화사회로의 이행을 위한 정책 패러다임 구축" 한국여성정책연구원 2008

    18 이창호, "다문화사회로의 이행을 위한 문화정책 현황과 발전 방향" 한국여성정책연구원 2008

    19 이선주, "국제노동이주와 젠더: 배제와 제한된 포용" 한국여성학회 22 (22): 125-155, 2006

    20 Adler, M.A, "Xenophobia and Ethnoviolence in Contemporary Germany" 22 : 1996

    21 Bobo, L, "White's Opposition to Busing: Symbolic Racism or Realistic Group Conflict" 45 (45): 1983

    22 Blalock,H.M, "Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations" John Wiley and Sons 1967

    23 McCrone, D, "The Sociology of Nationalism" Routledge 1998

    24 Allport, G. W, "The Nature of Prejudice" Addison Wesley 1954

    25 Yack, B., "The Myth of the Civic Nation in Theorizing Nationalism" State University of New York Press 1999

    26 Olzak, S, "The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict" Stanford University Press 1992

    27 Kelley, C, "The Cross-Cultural Adaptability Inventory" National Computer Systems 1995

    28 Castel S, "The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World(3nd ed.)" Guilford Press 2003

    29 Dustmann, C, "Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration" CReAM 2004

    30 Blumer, H, "Race Prejudice as A Sense of Group Position" 1 : 1958

    31 Citrin, J., "Public Opinion toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations" 59 (59): 1997

    32 Herring, M, "Pro-Black Doesn’t Mean Anti-White: The Structure of African-American Group Identity" 61 (61): 1999

    33 Quillian, L, "Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat, Population Composition and Anti-immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe" 4 : 1995

    34 Raijman, R, "Perceived Threat and Exclusionary Attitudes Towards Foreign Workers in Israel" 27 (27): 2004

    35 Pettigrew, T, "People under threat: Americans, Arabs, and Israelis. Peace and Conflict" 9 : 2003

    36 Smith,A.D, "Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era" Polity Press 1995

    37 Gellner,E, "Nations and Nationalism" Blackwell 1983

    38 Smith , A.D, "National identity" Penguin Books 1991

    39 Holley E.H, "National Identity: Civic, Ethnic, Hybrid, and Atomised Individuals" 61 (61): 1999

    40 Epstein, N.L, "National Identity and Xenophobia in an Ethnically Divided Society" 7 (7): 2005

    41 Hochman, O, "National Identity and Exclusionary Attitudes towards Immigrants in Two Ethno-National States: Germany and Israel in Comparative Perspective" 2008

    42 Hjerm, M, "National Identities, National Pride and Xenophobia: A Comparison of Four Western Countries" 41 (41): 1998

    43 Shlls, E, "Nation, Nationality, Nationalism and Civil Society" 1 : 1995

    44 Kymlicka,Will, "Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity" Oxford University Press 2007

    45 Staub, E, "Moral Exclusion, Personal Goal Theory, and Extreme Destructiveness" 46 (46): 1990

    46 Coenders, M, "Majority Populations' Attitudes towards Migrants and Minorities - Report for the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia"

    47 EUMC, "Majorities' Attitude Toward Minorities: Key Findings from the Eurobarometer and the European Social Survey"

    48 Oliver, J.E, "Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings" 47 (47): 2003

    49 Jones, F.L, "Individual and Societal Bases of National Identity:a Comparative Multilevel Analysis" 17 (17): 2001

    50 Sherif,M, "In Common Predicament" Houghton Mifflin 1996

    51 Stephan, W.G, "Improving Intergroup Relations" Brown & Benchmark 2001

    52 Semyonov, M, "Foreigners’ Impact on European Societies. Public Views and Perceptions in a Cross-National Comparative Perspective" 49 (49): 2008

    53 Wimmer, A, "Explaining Xenophobia and Racism: A Critical Review of Current Research Approaches" 20 : 1997

    54 Scheepers, P, "Ethnic Exclusionism in European Countries: Public Opposition to Civil Rights for Legal Migrants as a Response to Perceived Ethnic Threat" 18 : 2002

    55 Hagendoorn, L, "Education and Racism in A Cross-National Inventory of Positive Effects of Education on Ethnic Tolerance" Ashgate, Aldershot 1999

    56 Hainmueller, "Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe" 61 (61): 2007

    57 Fetzer, J.S, "Economic Self-interest or Cultural Marginality? Anti-immigration Sentiment and Nativist Political Movements in France, Germany and the USA" 26 (26): 2005

    58 Jones, F.L, "Diversities of National Identity in a Multicultural Society: The Australian case" 2 (2): 2001

    59 Lynch, E. W., "Developing cross-cultural competence in Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families" Paul H. Brookes 35-62, 1992

    60 Brown, D., "Contemporary Nationalism: Civic, Ethnocultural and Multicultural Politics" Routledge 2000

    61 Amir, Y, "Contact Hypothesis in Ethnic Relations" 71 : 1969

    62 Brubaker,R, "Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany" Harvard University Press 1992

    63 Shulman, S, "Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism" 35 (35): 2002

    64 Bar-Tal, D, "Causes and Consequences of Delegitimization: Models of Conflict and Ethnocentrism" 46 (46): 1990

    65 Heath, A, "British National Identity and Attitudes towards Immigration" 7 (7): 2005

    66 Brown, R, "An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Contact" 37 : 2005

    67 Pettigrew, T.F, "A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory" 90 (90): 2006

    68 행정안전부, "2010년 지방자치단체 외국인계 주민현황"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.8 0.8 0.84
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 1.29 1.221 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼