RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      보험사 기초서류준수의무 위반 관련 과징금제도 개선방안에 대한 연구 = A study on improvements to the penalty system for violations of insurers' obligations to comply with basic documents

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108885209

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Insurance products have the characteristics of intangible goods (legal instruments). Considering the characteristics of these insurance products, the current Insurance Business Act stipulates obligations related to basic documents on insurance products that insurance companies intend to handle. Based on this, there are various regulations under the Insurance Business Act, such as the obligation to comply with basic documents, management standards and the principle of change in preparation.
      If an insurance company violates the above basic document-related obligations, it will be fined as an administrative sanction, and in practice, the violation of the obligation to comply with basic documents is usually used by supervisory authorities as a means of sanctions related to non-payment of insurance payments. However, the problem is that the standard for calculating fines under the Insurance Business Act is set at a uniform standard of less than 50/100 of the annual income insurance premium, causing an excessive or understated problem of imposing fines.
      These penalty calculation standards can raise problems such as uniform sanctions and violation of the principle of clarity and there is a need to improve them. Thus, this paper examined the problems of the penalty regulations for violations of basic documents-related obligations under the current insurance business law and suggested a plan to subdivide the imposition of fines and improve the calculation standards, and to unify minor violations of the law.
      Since the uniform standard of the penalty calculation standard is contrary to the principle of clarity and prohibition of excess, it is necessary to subdivide the penalty and review the calculation standard, especially in important cases related to the protection of policyholders such as unfair behavior related to insurance payment.
      Next, in the case of unification through the imposition of fines, it can be seen that in accordance with the form of regulations on the supervision of Chapter 7 of the current Insurance Business Act and Insurance Business Supervision Regulations, the supervisory authority is exercising the supervisory authority in consideration of both the supervision of violations of the law and the supervision of the financial aspect. In consideration of this aspect, if an insurance company intentionally or negligently commits a serious violation of the law, such as non-payment of claims paid, it is necessary to clarify the calculation criteria, such as the amount of economic gains obtained from the violation of the law. On the contrary, it was considered desirable to impose a flat penalty on minor violations of the Insurance Business Act, which do not constitute a serious violation of the law, by regulating them as violations of order.
      번역하기

      Insurance products have the characteristics of intangible goods (legal instruments). Considering the characteristics of these insurance products, the current Insurance Business Act stipulates obligations related to basic documents on insurance product...

      Insurance products have the characteristics of intangible goods (legal instruments). Considering the characteristics of these insurance products, the current Insurance Business Act stipulates obligations related to basic documents on insurance products that insurance companies intend to handle. Based on this, there are various regulations under the Insurance Business Act, such as the obligation to comply with basic documents, management standards and the principle of change in preparation.
      If an insurance company violates the above basic document-related obligations, it will be fined as an administrative sanction, and in practice, the violation of the obligation to comply with basic documents is usually used by supervisory authorities as a means of sanctions related to non-payment of insurance payments. However, the problem is that the standard for calculating fines under the Insurance Business Act is set at a uniform standard of less than 50/100 of the annual income insurance premium, causing an excessive or understated problem of imposing fines.
      These penalty calculation standards can raise problems such as uniform sanctions and violation of the principle of clarity and there is a need to improve them. Thus, this paper examined the problems of the penalty regulations for violations of basic documents-related obligations under the current insurance business law and suggested a plan to subdivide the imposition of fines and improve the calculation standards, and to unify minor violations of the law.
      Since the uniform standard of the penalty calculation standard is contrary to the principle of clarity and prohibition of excess, it is necessary to subdivide the penalty and review the calculation standard, especially in important cases related to the protection of policyholders such as unfair behavior related to insurance payment.
      Next, in the case of unification through the imposition of fines, it can be seen that in accordance with the form of regulations on the supervision of Chapter 7 of the current Insurance Business Act and Insurance Business Supervision Regulations, the supervisory authority is exercising the supervisory authority in consideration of both the supervision of violations of the law and the supervision of the financial aspect. In consideration of this aspect, if an insurance company intentionally or negligently commits a serious violation of the law, such as non-payment of claims paid, it is necessary to clarify the calculation criteria, such as the amount of economic gains obtained from the violation of the law. On the contrary, it was considered desirable to impose a flat penalty on minor violations of the Insurance Business Act, which do not constitute a serious violation of the law, by regulating them as violations of order.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2018

      2 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2023

      3 성대규, "한국보험업법(개정2판)" 두남 2015

      4 김원각, "보험회사의 기초서류 위반 과징금 부과의 합리적인 개선방안"

      5 맹수석, "보험업법상 기초서류 관련 의무 위반에 따른 과징금제도의 법적 쟁점" 한국상사법학회 38 (38): 175-210, 2019

      6 한기정, "보험업법" 박영사 2019

      7 이성남, "보험업법" 씨아이알 2022

      8 황현아, "기초서류 준수의무 위반 시 과징금 부과기준 개선방안" 보험연구원 2018

      9 이상복, "금융법입문" 박영사 2023

      10 조성규, "과징금의 법적 성격에 대한 시론적 고찰" 행정법이론실무학회 (55) : 57-82, 2018

      1 홍정선, "행정법특강" 박영사 2018

      2 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2023

      3 성대규, "한국보험업법(개정2판)" 두남 2015

      4 김원각, "보험회사의 기초서류 위반 과징금 부과의 합리적인 개선방안"

      5 맹수석, "보험업법상 기초서류 관련 의무 위반에 따른 과징금제도의 법적 쟁점" 한국상사법학회 38 (38): 175-210, 2019

      6 한기정, "보험업법" 박영사 2019

      7 이성남, "보험업법" 씨아이알 2022

      8 황현아, "기초서류 준수의무 위반 시 과징금 부과기준 개선방안" 보험연구원 2018

      9 이상복, "금융법입문" 박영사 2023

      10 조성규, "과징금의 법적 성격에 대한 시론적 고찰" 행정법이론실무학회 (55) : 57-82, 2018

      11 권오승, "경제법" 법문사 2021

      12 杉村和俊, "金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題" 日本銀行金融研究所 34 (34): 2015

      13 遊田純一, "独禁法における課徴金制度の見直しについて" (5) : 2007

      14 安居孝啓, "最新保險業法" 大成出版社 2010

      15 岡田豊基, "損害保険料率カルテルを巡る課徴金の算定における売上額の意義" 36 (36): 2007

      16 石田 満, "保險業法" 文眞堂 2011

      17 上原 純, "保険業法上の規制緩和-2006年からの10年間 -" 日本保険学会 (639) : 2017

      18 金融庁, "保険会社向けの総合的な監督指針ㅡ"

      19 이철송, "企業規制에 대한 會社法的 책임추궁의 試論" 한국기업법학회 36 (36): 9-24, 2022

      20 Prölss, "VAG" C.H. Beck 2018

      21 Steven plitt, "The Punitive Damages Lottery Chase Is Over: Is There A Regulatory Alternative To The Tort Of Common Law Bad Faith And Does It Provide An Alternative Deterrent?" 37 : 1221-, 2005

      22 Financial Conduct Authority, "Guaranteed Asset Protection insurance: a competition remedy"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼