RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    분야별 규제영향분석(금융분야) = A Study on the Regulatory Impact Analysis: Statement in Financial Sector

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104184333

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Regulatory Impact Analysis(RIA) is an important instrument to upgrade quality of regulations. In Korea, the RIA is introduced since 1998 but we have some problem in conducting RIA. This report examines the problem of conducting RIA in financial sector relying to a survey and registered regulation statistics in the Regulatory Reform Committee.
    According to the preliminary analysis of Korean financial regulation, there are asymmetry between regulations of bank agencies and non-bank financial institutions. Banking institutions have more standard requirements than command and prohibition type regulations. This concerns the fact that the Korean financial regulatory agency regulates the same kind of financial product with different laws and principles. It poses efficiency problem when Korean banking institutions extend their business areas.
    The survey result on the state of conducting RIA in Korea shows that first, insufficient time to conduct RIA, second, insufficient consulting with regulatees, third, insufficient data collection, fourth, insufficient RIA conducting experience accumulation.
    Korean RIA statement has 8 evaluation areas, but most of it has not been sufficiently evaluated. To improve quality of RIA in financial sector, we need to apply more economic evaluation instead of benefit-cost analysis, prepare institutional arrangement to collect and manage financial institution`s data, and finally reorganize and simplify 8 evaluation areas and 20 evaluation elements.
    번역하기

    Regulatory Impact Analysis(RIA) is an important instrument to upgrade quality of regulations. In Korea, the RIA is introduced since 1998 but we have some problem in conducting RIA. This report examines the problem of conducting RIA in financial sector...

    Regulatory Impact Analysis(RIA) is an important instrument to upgrade quality of regulations. In Korea, the RIA is introduced since 1998 but we have some problem in conducting RIA. This report examines the problem of conducting RIA in financial sector relying to a survey and registered regulation statistics in the Regulatory Reform Committee.
    According to the preliminary analysis of Korean financial regulation, there are asymmetry between regulations of bank agencies and non-bank financial institutions. Banking institutions have more standard requirements than command and prohibition type regulations. This concerns the fact that the Korean financial regulatory agency regulates the same kind of financial product with different laws and principles. It poses efficiency problem when Korean banking institutions extend their business areas.
    The survey result on the state of conducting RIA in Korea shows that first, insufficient time to conduct RIA, second, insufficient consulting with regulatees, third, insufficient data collection, fourth, insufficient RIA conducting experience accumulation.
    Korean RIA statement has 8 evaluation areas, but most of it has not been sufficiently evaluated. To improve quality of RIA in financial sector, we need to apply more economic evaluation instead of benefit-cost analysis, prepare institutional arrangement to collect and manage financial institution`s data, and finally reorganize and simplify 8 evaluation areas and 20 evaluation elements.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼