RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    진료수행평가에서 증례유형과 표준화 환자 성별이 학생 성적에 미치는 영향 = Effects of case type and standardized patient gender on student performance in a clinical performance examination

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104018302

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    =Effects of Case Type and Standardized Patient Gender on Student Performance in a Clinical Performance ExaminationJonghoon Kim, MD, Kiyoung Lee1, MD, Dongmi Yoo2, MA, Eunbae Yang2, PhD

    Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of case type and gender of standardized patient on student performance in a clinical performance examination(CPX).
    Methods: During 2005, an eight-station CPX was administered to fourth-year students from 4 medical schools. A total of 306 students, of which 206(67%) were male, participated in the exam. Station checklists, scored by the SPs, consisted of history taking(Hx), physical examination(PE), information sharing(IS), clinical courtesy(CC) and patient-physician interaction(PPI). A measurement of students’ perceived difficulty was obtained through student questionnaires. The difference of CPX scores between male and female students were studied using Mann-Whitney's U.
    Results: Across the gender-neutral cases, female students scored better in Hx in 2 cases. In PE, IS and CC, the only difference seen was with CC in 1 case(female students scored higher). In PPI, female students performed better than male students in all female SP cases and one male SP case, but, there was a significant student gender-SP gender interaction when averaging all cases. For the gender sensitive case, there was no significant difference in all checklist categories in the male case when student gender was considered. In the female case, female students performed better than male students only in PPI. Student questionnaires revealed that there was no significant difference in perceived difficulty between male and female students.
    Conclusion: The standardized patients' ratings in gender sensitive cases are not affected by the gender of standardized patients and students, except in PPI with a female case where female students performed better than male students.
    번역하기

    =Effects of Case Type and Standardized Patient Gender on Student Performance in a Clinical Performance ExaminationJonghoon Kim, MD, Kiyoung Lee1, MD, Dongmi Yoo2, MA, Eunbae Yang2, PhD Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of ca...

    =Effects of Case Type and Standardized Patient Gender on Student Performance in a Clinical Performance ExaminationJonghoon Kim, MD, Kiyoung Lee1, MD, Dongmi Yoo2, MA, Eunbae Yang2, PhD

    Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of case type and gender of standardized patient on student performance in a clinical performance examination(CPX).
    Methods: During 2005, an eight-station CPX was administered to fourth-year students from 4 medical schools. A total of 306 students, of which 206(67%) were male, participated in the exam. Station checklists, scored by the SPs, consisted of history taking(Hx), physical examination(PE), information sharing(IS), clinical courtesy(CC) and patient-physician interaction(PPI). A measurement of students’ perceived difficulty was obtained through student questionnaires. The difference of CPX scores between male and female students were studied using Mann-Whitney's U.
    Results: Across the gender-neutral cases, female students scored better in Hx in 2 cases. In PE, IS and CC, the only difference seen was with CC in 1 case(female students scored higher). In PPI, female students performed better than male students in all female SP cases and one male SP case, but, there was a significant student gender-SP gender interaction when averaging all cases. For the gender sensitive case, there was no significant difference in all checklist categories in the male case when student gender was considered. In the female case, female students performed better than male students only in PPI. Student questionnaires revealed that there was no significant difference in perceived difficulty between male and female students.
    Conclusion: The standardized patients' ratings in gender sensitive cases are not affected by the gender of standardized patients and students, except in PPI with a female case where female students performed better than male students.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "Use of standardized examinees to screen for standardized patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination" 17 (17): 9-13, 2005

    2 "The interaction of student gender and standardized-patient gender on a per formance-based examination of clinical competence" 9-, 1991

    3 "The influence of student and standardized patient genders on scoring in an objective structured clinical examination" 9-, 1991

    4 "The effects of information sharing between students on results of clinical performance examination" 18 (18): 239-247, 2006

    5 "The agreement of checklist recordings between faculties and standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE)" 15 (15): 141-150, 2003

    6 "The Appropriateness of using standardized patients' (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination(CPX)" 17 (17): 163-172, 2005

    7 "Standardized patients´ accuracy in recording checklist items during clinical performance examinations" 17 (17): 197-203, 2005

    8 "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patients rating" 74-85, 1991

    9 "Sharing of information among students and its effect on the scores of clinical performance examination(CPX)" 17 (17): 185-196, 2005

    10 "Gender, sequence of cases and day effects on clinical skills assessment with standardized patients" 33 : 499-503, 1999

    1 "Use of standardized examinees to screen for standardized patient scoring bias in a clinical skills examination" 17 (17): 9-13, 2005

    2 "The interaction of student gender and standardized-patient gender on a per formance-based examination of clinical competence" 9-, 1991

    3 "The influence of student and standardized patient genders on scoring in an objective structured clinical examination" 9-, 1991

    4 "The effects of information sharing between students on results of clinical performance examination" 18 (18): 239-247, 2006

    5 "The agreement of checklist recordings between faculties and standardized patients in an objective structured clinical examination(OSCE)" 15 (15): 141-150, 2003

    6 "The Appropriateness of using standardized patients' (SPs) assessment scores in clinical performance examination(CPX)" 17 (17): 163-172, 2005

    7 "Standardized patients´ accuracy in recording checklist items during clinical performance examinations" 17 (17): 197-203, 2005

    8 "Sources of unreliability and bias in standardized patients rating" 74-85, 1991

    9 "Sharing of information among students and its effect on the scores of clinical performance examination(CPX)" 17 (17): 185-196, 2005

    10 "Gender, sequence of cases and day effects on clinical skills assessment with standardized patients" 33 : 499-503, 1999

    11 "Experience of objective structured clinical examination in Gyeong-Sang national university college of medicine" 17 (17): 249-256, 2005

    12 "Effects of student gender standardized-patient gender in a single case using a male and a female standardized patient" 301-303, 1993

    13 "Effects of examinee gender and their interaction on standardized patients' ratings of examinees' interpersonal and communication skill" 153-157, 1993

    14 "Do women medical students outperform men in obstetrics and gynecology?" 73 (73): 1125-, 1998

    15 "Difference in clinical experiences based on gender of third-year medical students in a required family medicine preceptorship" 77 (77): 1241-1246, 2002

    16 "Correlation of CPX scores with the scores of the clinical clerkship assessments and written examinations" 17 (17): 297-303, 2005

    17 "Comparison of results from objective structured clinical examinations for medical students performed nefore and after clinical clerkship" 16 (16): 63-71, 2004

    18 "Comparison of professional standardized and amateur standardized patients in OSCE" 17 (17): 97-105, 2005

    19 "Are interpersonal skills ratings influenced by gender in a clinical skills assessment using standardized patients?" 6 (6): 231-241, 2001

    20 "An analysis of standardized patient checklist errors and effects on student scores" 37 (37): 99-104, 2003

    21 "An OSCE for summative assessment after clinical clerkship: Experience in Ewha medical school" 16 (16): 33-40, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-07-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국의학교육 -> Korean Journal of Medical Education
    외국어명 : korean journal of medical education -> 미등록
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.76
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.82 0.76 1.204 0.08
    더보기
    해외이동버튼