RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    개인정보 보호법제의 헌법적 고찰 = Constitutional Review on Personal Data Protection Act

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99865675

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper is aimed at constitutional review on Personal Data Protection Act, which was enacted on March 29, 2011 to protect individuals` privacy from collection, leakage, misuse and abuse of personal data. The Act is marked by following features. First, in regard to personal data protection, it is an integrated law that applies to both pubic and private sector. However, in my opinion, individuals`privacy can be more widely protected by separate approach to each of public and private sector. As private sector is based on the equal relationship between private entities, we should focus on public sector where freedom of individuals can be violated unilaterally by the exercise of state power. Second, the data subject`s consent is a key element of Personal Data Protection Act. However, we cannot guarantee the validity of the consent. In order to regard the consent as valid, the data subject should know about the object of the consent, and have the right to choose whether to give consent and the scope of the consent. In reality, either one of these criteria are not being satisfied. Third, Personal Data Protection Act imposes criminal punishment for almost every law violation. It states that the violation can be punished by imprisonment up to ten years, which shows the level of the punishment is also significantly high. Imposing criminal punishment for the violation of processing of personal data without clearly defining the concept of personal data is against the principle of legality, which requires the elements of the statute that imposes punishment to be clear so that one with sound common sense and a reasonable sense of law should know specifically which act is prohibited. In the information society, personal data is not only an object of protection but also that of use. Personal Data Protection Act lacks in the sense of balance between two conflicting values, personal data protection and freedom of information.
    번역하기

    This paper is aimed at constitutional review on Personal Data Protection Act, which was enacted on March 29, 2011 to protect individuals` privacy from collection, leakage, misuse and abuse of personal data. The Act is marked by following features. Fir...

    This paper is aimed at constitutional review on Personal Data Protection Act, which was enacted on March 29, 2011 to protect individuals` privacy from collection, leakage, misuse and abuse of personal data. The Act is marked by following features. First, in regard to personal data protection, it is an integrated law that applies to both pubic and private sector. However, in my opinion, individuals`privacy can be more widely protected by separate approach to each of public and private sector. As private sector is based on the equal relationship between private entities, we should focus on public sector where freedom of individuals can be violated unilaterally by the exercise of state power. Second, the data subject`s consent is a key element of Personal Data Protection Act. However, we cannot guarantee the validity of the consent. In order to regard the consent as valid, the data subject should know about the object of the consent, and have the right to choose whether to give consent and the scope of the consent. In reality, either one of these criteria are not being satisfied. Third, Personal Data Protection Act imposes criminal punishment for almost every law violation. It states that the violation can be punished by imprisonment up to ten years, which shows the level of the punishment is also significantly high. Imposing criminal punishment for the violation of processing of personal data without clearly defining the concept of personal data is against the principle of legality, which requires the elements of the statute that imposes punishment to be clear so that one with sound common sense and a reasonable sense of law should know specifically which act is prohibited. In the information society, personal data is not only an object of protection but also that of use. Personal Data Protection Act lacks in the sense of balance between two conflicting values, personal data protection and freedom of information.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼