RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    The Japan-Korea comparative study of a practical skill subject lesson: Elementary school lesson comparison of Japan and South Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105484695

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research were music, arts, home, and a physical education, and were
    showing clearly how the student's subject view and subject view are experienced
    by performing Japan-South Korea comparison.
    1) As a subject view of the children in practical skill subject lesson experience
    structure, the subject view in which many were common existed, and many
    common factors were especially observed in fine arts and music.
    2) The study as children's study experience is the lesson of each subject which
    worked, and a difference is looked at by that children are actually learning
    and having experienced. Sex difference is especially looked at by South
    Korean children's study.
    3) As for a child's assessment of teachers by their students and the teacher's
    degree of satisfaction, the difference was found in Japan and South Korea.
    A child's evaluation and Japan's degree of satisfaction of the teacher corresponded.
    However, in South Korea, the gap was seen by a child's evaluation and the
    teacher's degree of satisfaction.
    번역하기

    This research were music, arts, home, and a physical education, and were showing clearly how the student's subject view and subject view are experienced by performing Japan-South Korea comparison. 1) As a subject view of the children in practical s...

    This research were music, arts, home, and a physical education, and were
    showing clearly how the student's subject view and subject view are experienced
    by performing Japan-South Korea comparison.
    1) As a subject view of the children in practical skill subject lesson experience
    structure, the subject view in which many were common existed, and many
    common factors were especially observed in fine arts and music.
    2) The study as children's study experience is the lesson of each subject which
    worked, and a difference is looked at by that children are actually learning
    and having experienced. Sex difference is especially looked at by South
    Korean children's study.
    3) As for a child's assessment of teachers by their students and the teacher's
    degree of satisfaction, the difference was found in Japan and South Korea.
    A child's evaluation and Japan's degree of satisfaction of the teacher corresponded.
    However, in South Korea, the gap was seen by a child's evaluation and the
    teacher's degree of satisfaction.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 刈谷三郞, "한국, 일본의 초등(소)학교 체육과정의 변천에 관한 비교 연구" 한국스포츠리서치 16 (16): 587-598, 2005

    2 宮本隆信, "한국 초등학교 실기계교과수업 평가표 작성의 시도: 교과수업 조사에 따른 인자분석" 22 (22): 27-47, 2011

    3 刈谷三郎, "日韓教科教育入門 音楽・図画工作・家庭・体育" 図書出版弘耕 2007

    4 刈谷三郎, "日韓小学生の教科別好き嫌い度比較研究" 39-55, 2005

    5 刈谷三郎研究代表, "教科教育における授業評価システムに関する教科横断的研究" 2004

    6 刈谷三郎, "実技系教����遊びの日韓比較研究" 한국일본교육학회 13 (13): 1-18, 2008

    7 刈谷三郎研究代表, "実技を伴う教科と子どもの「遊び」に関する日韓比較研究" 2009

    1 刈谷三郞, "한국, 일본의 초등(소)학교 체육과정의 변천에 관한 비교 연구" 한국스포츠리서치 16 (16): 587-598, 2005

    2 宮本隆信, "한국 초등학교 실기계교과수업 평가표 작성의 시도: 교과수업 조사에 따른 인자분석" 22 (22): 27-47, 2011

    3 刈谷三郎, "日韓教科教育入門 音楽・図画工作・家庭・体育" 図書出版弘耕 2007

    4 刈谷三郎, "日韓小学生の教科別好き嫌い度比較研究" 39-55, 2005

    5 刈谷三郎研究代表, "教科教育における授業評価システムに関する教科横断的研究" 2004

    6 刈谷三郎, "実技系教����遊びの日韓比較研究" 한국일본교육학회 13 (13): 1-18, 2008

    7 刈谷三郎研究代表, "実技を伴う教科と子どもの「遊び」に関する日韓比較研究" 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.52 0.52 0.43
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.36 0.37 0.783 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼