영화와 성찰: 서사적 영상에서 성찰적 형상으로 = Cinema and Reflexion: From Narrative Image to Reflexive Figure

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the present study is to illuminate the reflexivity of cinema or the relationship between cinema and reflexivity. According to the aesthetic theory of the enlightenment and realism, cinema may be regarded as a medium irrelevant to reflexivity. It is because the elements of cinema are quite similar to the realities and, for this reason, cinema does not provide with the possibility of reflexion. However, there are attempts to overcome this problem in the process of the development of cinema theories. First, as cinema is regarded as a narrative system, it is explained to have the same status as that of other arts including literature and understood to be closely related to traditional meaning of reflexivity. Second, cinema can be regarded as a figural system. In this case, it is understood as a medium demonstrating the process of reflexion or thinking directly. This study is focused on the second case. It is because there can be problems in the theoretical work to assume cinema to be narrative. What is more important, we can think it as an aesthetic explication of the peculiarity of cinema that cinema is regarded as a figural system and, in the context, the meaning of the reflexivity of cinema is understood. That is, what is important in the relation between cinema and reflexivity is not that cinema evokes the reflexion but that it represents the process of this reflexion. That the meaning of art is understood as the direct representation of reflexion process is based on relatively new concepts in aesthetic theory. In addition, what is to be noted is that, in the development of cinema theories, a new scientific methodology may be more effective than aesthetics based on linguistics or semiotics.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "할리우드 장르의 구조" ^한나래 1995

2 "영화이론의 개념들" 서울: 시각과언어 1998

3 "소설의 이론" 1985

4 "성찰적 근대화" 서울: 한울 1998

5 "Zwei Seiten der Sprache und zwei Typen aphatischer Storungen Aufsatze zur Linguistik und Poetik" 1979

6 "What Novels can do that Films can't and vise versa Eds:Film Theory and Criticism" New York: Oxford UP 435-451, 1999

7 "Understanding Media:The Extensions of Man" Cambridge: MIT P 1997

8 "Theories of Cinema" Austin: U of Texas P 1999

9 "Strukturalismus in der Literaturwissenschaft" 1972

10 "Sprache und Film" 1973

11 "On the Notion of Cinematographic Language U of California P" 1976

12 "Metaphor/Metonymy or the Imaginary Referent" Psychoanalysis and the Cinema 1982

13 "Laokoon oder ber die Grenzen der Malerei und Poesie" 1964

14 "Gedanken zu einer sthetik des Kinos Texte zum Verhaltnis von Literatur und Film 1909-1929" ki (ki): 1978

15 "Funktion und Feld des Sprechens und der Sprache in der Psychoanalyse:Schriften I" Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp 1996

16 "Figures of literary Discourse" 1982

17 "Figures of Desire A Theory and Analysis of Surrealist Film U of Illinois P" 1981

18 "Figures of Desire A Theory and Analysis of Surrealist Film U of Illinois P" 1981

19 "Einfuhrung in die Filmphilologie" 1991

20 "Discourse or Figure? Postmodernism as a Regime of Signification" 1988

21 "Die Filmarbeit 2: Montage/AV 8.1" 1999

22 "Das Zeit-Bild : Kino 2" Frankfurt/M Suhrkamp 1997