RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      성매매와 형사법적 처벌의 한계 = Prostitution and Limitation of Criminal Punishment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106159725

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The principle of criminal policy can be divided into three types.
      First, the decriminalization maintains that since voluntary prostitution is legalized, it is not a punishment of both sides, and that mediation, abetment and exploitation of prostitution are punished as crimes.
      Second, the legal regulamentarism maintains that both sides’ behavior of voluntary prostitution is not punished, and that this system controls the behavior of prostitution such as levy of tax on the prostitution, obligation of medical supervision, and authorization of special zone.
      Third, the prohibitionism, which is enforced in Korea, means that all kinds of prostitution behavior including voluntary prostitution and mediation of prostitution are punished as crimes.
      From the viewpoint of freedom of self-determination and sexual self-determination rather than feminism or moralism, this paper tries to examine whether or not it is appropriate to select what kind of legislation among them. When the criminal law expects a punishment which is the strictest law-effect, the restriction principle of self-determination demands that self-action should not violate the self-determination of others, and that although self-interest is violated by self-intention, there should be no violation of human life or serious injury of body.
      Although human image which the criminal law presupposes is not moral but immoral character, the image presupposes ordinary people who do not harm others in a minimal way.
      So I suggest that people who practice prostitution in a voluntary way is released from the criminal punishment, but that it is advisable that we make a law where only people who force or tempt prostitution should be punished.
      번역하기

      The principle of criminal policy can be divided into three types. First, the decriminalization maintains that since voluntary prostitution is legalized, it is not a punishment of both sides, and that mediation, abetment and exploitation of prostitutio...

      The principle of criminal policy can be divided into three types.
      First, the decriminalization maintains that since voluntary prostitution is legalized, it is not a punishment of both sides, and that mediation, abetment and exploitation of prostitution are punished as crimes.
      Second, the legal regulamentarism maintains that both sides’ behavior of voluntary prostitution is not punished, and that this system controls the behavior of prostitution such as levy of tax on the prostitution, obligation of medical supervision, and authorization of special zone.
      Third, the prohibitionism, which is enforced in Korea, means that all kinds of prostitution behavior including voluntary prostitution and mediation of prostitution are punished as crimes.
      From the viewpoint of freedom of self-determination and sexual self-determination rather than feminism or moralism, this paper tries to examine whether or not it is appropriate to select what kind of legislation among them. When the criminal law expects a punishment which is the strictest law-effect, the restriction principle of self-determination demands that self-action should not violate the self-determination of others, and that although self-interest is violated by self-intention, there should be no violation of human life or serious injury of body.
      Although human image which the criminal law presupposes is not moral but immoral character, the image presupposes ordinary people who do not harm others in a minimal way.
      So I suggest that people who practice prostitution in a voluntary way is released from the criminal punishment, but that it is advisable that we make a law where only people who force or tempt prostitution should be punished.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 변화순, "성매매 관련 국제기구의 동향과 각국의 법"

      2 Vern, "매춘의 역사" 42-, 1992

      3 田中英夫, "英美法辭典" 539-, 1991

      4 內野正幸, "自己決定權と平等" 8-, 1998

      5 曾根威彦, "自己決定の自由, in: 佐藤司 古稀論文集" 66-, 2002

      6 佐藤幸治, "憲法" 460-, 1995

      7 Tong, "Woman, Sex, and the Law" 41-, 1990

      8 Burton, "The Macmillan Book of Proverbs, Maxims, and Famous Phrase" 2490-, 1948

      9 Richards, "Sex, Drugs, Deaths, and the Law" 94-95, 1995

      10 Bresler, "Sex and the law" 50-51, 1995

      1 변화순, "성매매 관련 국제기구의 동향과 각국의 법"

      2 Vern, "매춘의 역사" 42-, 1992

      3 田中英夫, "英美法辭典" 539-, 1991

      4 內野正幸, "自己決定權と平等" 8-, 1998

      5 曾根威彦, "自己決定の自由, in: 佐藤司 古稀論文集" 66-, 2002

      6 佐藤幸治, "憲法" 460-, 1995

      7 Tong, "Woman, Sex, and the Law" 41-, 1990

      8 Burton, "The Macmillan Book of Proverbs, Maxims, and Famous Phrase" 2490-, 1948

      9 Richards, "Sex, Drugs, Deaths, and the Law" 94-95, 1995

      10 Bresler, "Sex and the law" 50-51, 1995

      11 Bresler, "Sex and the law" 50-, 2000

      12 Perry, "Right of Privacy Challenges to Prostitution Statutes" 28 : 466-,

      13 J.Davis, "Prostitution, An International Handbook on Trends, Problem, and policies" 129-130, 1995

      14 Barry, "Prostitution of sexuality" 237-, 2000

      15 Reanda, "Prostitution as a Human Rights Question : Problem and Prospects of United Nation Action" 210-, 1999

      16 Decker, "Prostition: Regulation and Control" 59-, 1980

      17 Decker, "Prostition: Regulation and Control" 140-, 1980

      18 "Black's Law Dictionary, 6ed." 1222-, 2000

      19 Plant, "AIDS, drugs, and prostitution" 43-, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼