RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      피부과 영역에서 저장-회송 원격진료와 대면진료 시 진단 일치율 비교 연구 = Comparison of Diagnostic Agreement between Store-and-forward Teleconsultation and Face-to-face Consultation in Dermatology

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40019049

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      ■ Objectives Many researches on telemedicine are in progress all over the world, but there are a few studies in Korea. The purpose of this paper was to compare diagnoses from store-and-forward (SAF) teleconsultation and traditional face-to-lace (FTF) office visiting.
      ■ Methods and materials Fifty lesions of 50 patients are examined by one dermatologist through teleconsultation and clinic-based consultation system. Concordance of diagnoses was compared.
      ■ Results There were 41 complete agreements (82%), 9 partial agreements (18%), and no disagreement of the diagnoses.
      ■ Conclusions Our results suggest that digital image consultations are comparably reliable to the clinic-based consultations and that relatively inexpensive equipment can render a high-quality teledermatology consultation. We doubt whether the teleconsultation would be applied to the broad range of dermatologic conditions. Further investigation in this field is necessary and it will achieve increased accuracy and wider acceptance.
      번역하기

      ■ Objectives Many researches on telemedicine are in progress all over the world, but there are a few studies in Korea. The purpose of this paper was to compare diagnoses from store-and-forward (SAF) teleconsultation and traditional face-to-lace (FT...

      ■ Objectives Many researches on telemedicine are in progress all over the world, but there are a few studies in Korea. The purpose of this paper was to compare diagnoses from store-and-forward (SAF) teleconsultation and traditional face-to-lace (FTF) office visiting.
      ■ Methods and materials Fifty lesions of 50 patients are examined by one dermatologist through teleconsultation and clinic-based consultation system. Concordance of diagnoses was compared.
      ■ Results There were 41 complete agreements (82%), 9 partial agreements (18%), and no disagreement of the diagnoses.
      ■ Conclusions Our results suggest that digital image consultations are comparably reliable to the clinic-based consultations and that relatively inexpensive equipment can render a high-quality teledermatology consultation. We doubt whether the teleconsultation would be applied to the broad range of dermatologic conditions. Further investigation in this field is necessary and it will achieve increased accuracy and wider acceptance.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼