RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Clinical characteristics of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection in children and the performance of rapid antigen test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104549565

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: In autumn 2009, the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1)virus spread throughout South Korea. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics of children infected by the 2009H1N1 influenza A virus, and to compare the rapid antigen and realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.
      Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≥18 years of age who presented to Soonchunhyang University Hospital in Seoul with respiratory symptoms, including fever, between September 2009 and January 2010. A real-time PCR test was used to definitively diagnose 2009 H1N1 influenza A infection. Medical records of confirmed cases were reviewed for sex, age, and the time of infection. The decision to perform rapid antigen testing was not influenced by clinical conditions, but by individual factors such as economic conditions. Its sensitivity and specificity were evaluated compared to real-time PCR test results.
      Results: In total, 934 patients tested positive for H1N1 by real-time PCR. The highest number of patients (48.9%) was diagnosed in November. Most patients (48.2%) were aged between 6 and 10 years.
      Compared with the H1N1 real-time PCR test results, the rapid antigen test showed 22% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Seventy-eight patients were hospitalized for H1N1 influenza A virus infection, and fever was the most common symptom (97.4%).
      Conclusion: For diagnosis of 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus infection,the rapid antigen test was inferior to the real-time PCR test in both sensitivity and specificity. This outcome suggests that the rapid antigen test is inappropriate for screening.
      번역하기

      Purpose: In autumn 2009, the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1)virus spread throughout South Korea. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics of children infected by the 2009H1N1 influenza A virus, and to compare the rapid ant...

      Purpose: In autumn 2009, the swine-origin influenza A (H1N1)virus spread throughout South Korea. The aims of this study were to determine the clinical characteristics of children infected by the 2009H1N1 influenza A virus, and to compare the rapid antigen and realtime polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests.
      Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients ≥18 years of age who presented to Soonchunhyang University Hospital in Seoul with respiratory symptoms, including fever, between September 2009 and January 2010. A real-time PCR test was used to definitively diagnose 2009 H1N1 influenza A infection. Medical records of confirmed cases were reviewed for sex, age, and the time of infection. The decision to perform rapid antigen testing was not influenced by clinical conditions, but by individual factors such as economic conditions. Its sensitivity and specificity were evaluated compared to real-time PCR test results.
      Results: In total, 934 patients tested positive for H1N1 by real-time PCR. The highest number of patients (48.9%) was diagnosed in November. Most patients (48.2%) were aged between 6 and 10 years.
      Compared with the H1N1 real-time PCR test results, the rapid antigen test showed 22% sensitivity and 83% specificity. Seventy-eight patients were hospitalized for H1N1 influenza A virus infection, and fever was the most common symptom (97.4%).
      Conclusion: For diagnosis of 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus infection,the rapid antigen test was inferior to the real-time PCR test in both sensitivity and specificity. This outcome suggests that the rapid antigen test is inappropriate for screening.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 노지윤, "대유행 인플루엔자(H1N1 2009)의 역학, 임상적 특성: 일개 거점병원의 경험" 대한감염학회 42 (42): 69-75, 2010

      2 김영근, "대유행 인플루엔자(H1N1 2009)에서 신속항원검사 양성률" 대한감염학회 42 (42): 95-98, 2010

      3 Sandora TJ, "Test characteristics of commercial influenza assays for detecting pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in children" 29 : 261-262, 2010

      4 Reddy D, "Responding to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza: the role of oseltamivir" 65 (65): ii35-ii40, 2010

      5 Vasoo S, "Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (swine) influenza A/H1N1" 49 : 1090-1093, 2009

      6 Boivin G, "Predicting influenza infections during epidemics with use of a clinical case definition" 31 : 1166-1169, 2000

      7 Drexler JF, "Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus" 15 : 1662-1664, 2009

      8 Writing Committee of the WHO Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Pandemic (H1N1), "Influenza in Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection" 362 : 1708-1719, 2010

      9 World Health Organization, "Human infection with new influenza A (H1N1) virus: clinical observations from Mexico and other affected countries, May 2009" 84 : 185-189, 2009

      10 황유선, "Evaluation of the Efficacies of Rapid Antigen Test, Multiplex PCR, and Real-time PCR for the Detection of a Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus" 대한진단검사의학회 30 (30): 142-152, 2010

      1 노지윤, "대유행 인플루엔자(H1N1 2009)의 역학, 임상적 특성: 일개 거점병원의 경험" 대한감염학회 42 (42): 69-75, 2010

      2 김영근, "대유행 인플루엔자(H1N1 2009)에서 신속항원검사 양성률" 대한감염학회 42 (42): 95-98, 2010

      3 Sandora TJ, "Test characteristics of commercial influenza assays for detecting pandemic influenza A (H1N1) in children" 29 : 261-262, 2010

      4 Reddy D, "Responding to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza: the role of oseltamivir" 65 (65): ii35-ii40, 2010

      5 Vasoo S, "Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (swine) influenza A/H1N1" 49 : 1090-1093, 2009

      6 Boivin G, "Predicting influenza infections during epidemics with use of a clinical case definition" 31 : 1166-1169, 2000

      7 Drexler JF, "Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus" 15 : 1662-1664, 2009

      8 Writing Committee of the WHO Consultation on Clinical Aspects of Pandemic (H1N1), "Influenza in Clinical aspects of pandemic 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection" 362 : 1708-1719, 2010

      9 World Health Organization, "Human infection with new influenza A (H1N1) virus: clinical observations from Mexico and other affected countries, May 2009" 84 : 185-189, 2009

      10 황유선, "Evaluation of the Efficacies of Rapid Antigen Test, Multiplex PCR, and Real-time PCR for the Detection of a Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus" 대한진단검사의학회 30 (30): 142-152, 2010

      11 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), "Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus- United States, 2009" 58 : 826-829, 2009

      12 Cheng XD, "Evaluation of a new rapid influenza A diagnostic test for detection of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 and seasonal influenza A virus" 50 : 153-155, 2011

      13 Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team, "Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans" 360 : 2605-2615, 2009

      14 Zambon M, "Diagnosis of influenza in the community: relationship of clinical diagnosis to confirmed virological, serologic, or molecular detection of influenza" 161 : 2116-2122, 2001

      15 "Development and Evaluation of a Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Test for the Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Influenza Virus" AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY 49 (49): 437-438, 2011

      16 Lee JY, "Comparision of rapid antigen test for diagnosis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009" 41 (41): S275-, 2009

      17 최영진, "Comparative Analysis of the Multiple Test Methods for the Detection of Pandemic Influenza A/H1N1 2009 Virus" 한국미생물·생명공학회 20 (20): 1450-1456, 2010

      18 Heo JY, "Clinical usefulness of a rapid antigen test for novel influenza A (H1N1) virus" 41 (41): S198-, 2009

      19 Monto AS, "Clinical signs and symptoms predicting influenza infection" 160 : 3243-3247, 2000

      20 Sullivan SJ, "2009 H1N1 influenza" 85 : 64-76, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Pediatrics -> Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Pediatrics -> Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics
      KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-07-16 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한소아과학회 -> 대한소아청소년과학회 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 소아과 -> Korean Journal of Pediatrics KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.18 0.18 0.16
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.17 0.2 0.369 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼