RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    家庭暴力과 離婚後 子女養育에 관한 一考 = A Study on Domestic Violence and Child Rearing after Divorce

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76441918

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article examines problems relating with divorce, parental rights, and the rearing of children caused by domestic violence(hereafter DV) as a domestic case. Namely, the article investigates how DV is related with the rearing of children after divorce and what interpretation our family law has adopted until now. Also, the article obtains hints referring to while the law of international human rights has played a leading role mainly by UN the American law has introduced problems with DV into its family law in regard with the parental responsibility law from 1970.<BR>  The second chapter following the introduction of the first chapter looks at the reality of DV in our nation and the status of DV in divorce. As the third chapter describe the contents about the law of rearing child and DV of America, it investigates laws related with DV, parental responsibility law, DV in America.<BR>  The fourth chapter examines effects of DV to children, standards in the determination of a person in parental authority and DV, and standards in the determination of visitation rights and DV.<BR>  Since our nation does not provide concrete standards that can give practical help to the judgment of the court besides abstract welfare principles for children, new standards through precedent cases has not yet been formed. In addition, only a few precedent cases showed an attitude that does not significantly consider the violence of a spouse when a person in parental authority is determined after divorce. However, as shown the investigation of America’s cases, DV of parents affect children obviously and badly. Thus, our family law should also clearly state DV as a consideration factor in the determination of a custodian and a person in parental authority and visitation rights. Moreover, in the case of a divorce degree caused by DV, the court should make a determination that can concretely realize the welfare of children according to individual cases. In particular, when judging a permission of visitation rights and its continuity, the best welfare of children should be the supreme standard.
    번역하기

      This article examines problems relating with divorce, parental rights, and the rearing of children caused by domestic violence(hereafter DV) as a domestic case. Namely, the article investigates how DV is related with the rearing of childre...

      This article examines problems relating with divorce, parental rights, and the rearing of children caused by domestic violence(hereafter DV) as a domestic case. Namely, the article investigates how DV is related with the rearing of children after divorce and what interpretation our family law has adopted until now. Also, the article obtains hints referring to while the law of international human rights has played a leading role mainly by UN the American law has introduced problems with DV into its family law in regard with the parental responsibility law from 1970.<BR>  The second chapter following the introduction of the first chapter looks at the reality of DV in our nation and the status of DV in divorce. As the third chapter describe the contents about the law of rearing child and DV of America, it investigates laws related with DV, parental responsibility law, DV in America.<BR>  The fourth chapter examines effects of DV to children, standards in the determination of a person in parental authority and DV, and standards in the determination of visitation rights and DV.<BR>  Since our nation does not provide concrete standards that can give practical help to the judgment of the court besides abstract welfare principles for children, new standards through precedent cases has not yet been formed. In addition, only a few precedent cases showed an attitude that does not significantly consider the violence of a spouse when a person in parental authority is determined after divorce. However, as shown the investigation of America’s cases, DV of parents affect children obviously and badly. Thus, our family law should also clearly state DV as a consideration factor in the determination of a custodian and a person in parental authority and visitation rights. Moreover, in the case of a divorce degree caused by DV, the court should make a determination that can concretely realize the welfare of children according to individual cases. In particular, when judging a permission of visitation rights and its continuity, the best welfare of children should be the supreme standard.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 우리나라의 DV 실태와 이혼에 있어서 DV
      Ⅲ. 미국의 자녀 양육법과 DV
      Ⅳ. DV와 이혼후 자녀양육에 관한 몇 가지 문제
      Ⅴ. 맺는말
      참고문헌
      【Abstract】
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
      Ⅱ. 우리나라의 DV 실태와 이혼에 있어서 DV
      Ⅲ. 미국의 자녀 양육법과 DV
      Ⅳ. DV와 이혼후 자녀양육에 관한 몇 가지 문제
      Ⅴ. 맺는말
      참고문헌
      【Abstract】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼