RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    중국물권법의 내용 및 우리 법과의 비교 = Overview of the Chinese Real Right Act and Comparison with the Korean Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76453658

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The Chinese Real Right Act, as the result of an extremely difficult birth, has been enacted on 16. March in 2007 and shall come into force on 1. October this year. This Act is of significance, not only because it is the first systematic and synthetic law concerned with the real right in China, but because it is the newest real right law in the world.<BR>  As is generally known, many foreign enterprises including korean company are in action actively in China. Therefore it can be foreseeable that this Act will have a great influence on acquiring of land for enterprise and on loaning operation money from banking facilities.<BR>  On account of those importances, in this thesis, firstly the enacting process of this Act is chased and the content of this Act is investigated. After that, the content of this Act is compared with that of the Korean Real Property Law. Lastly it is examined how far this Act steps forward to the esteem of private property and the idea of legalism which are adopted by western countries including Korea.<BR>  In consequence, it is found that the Chinese Real Right Act has come up closely to the esteem of private property and the idea of legalism which are adopted by western countries. Especially the legislators have endeavored to establish a legal order that is in harmony with private ownership, while holding firmly the public land ownership system which has been adopted hitherto and protecting national property. This Act has executed substantial reforms after tiding over many political obstacles ; equal protection among state ownership, collective ownership and private ownership, unification of registration system, automatic renewal of the Right for using of Residential Site or Construction Site when the term is due, etc. Moreover this Law has declared the doctrine of legalism and carried more throughly it through protecting real rights, prohibiting infringement on them, and regulating reasonable compensation when a private property is expropriated. This Act has enhanced recognition of private ownership one step ahead.
    번역하기

      The Chinese Real Right Act, as the result of an extremely difficult birth, has been enacted on 16. March in 2007 and shall come into force on 1. October this year. This Act is of significance, not only because it is the first systematic an...

      The Chinese Real Right Act, as the result of an extremely difficult birth, has been enacted on 16. March in 2007 and shall come into force on 1. October this year. This Act is of significance, not only because it is the first systematic and synthetic law concerned with the real right in China, but because it is the newest real right law in the world.<BR>  As is generally known, many foreign enterprises including korean company are in action actively in China. Therefore it can be foreseeable that this Act will have a great influence on acquiring of land for enterprise and on loaning operation money from banking facilities.<BR>  On account of those importances, in this thesis, firstly the enacting process of this Act is chased and the content of this Act is investigated. After that, the content of this Act is compared with that of the Korean Real Property Law. Lastly it is examined how far this Act steps forward to the esteem of private property and the idea of legalism which are adopted by western countries including Korea.<BR>  In consequence, it is found that the Chinese Real Right Act has come up closely to the esteem of private property and the idea of legalism which are adopted by western countries. Especially the legislators have endeavored to establish a legal order that is in harmony with private ownership, while holding firmly the public land ownership system which has been adopted hitherto and protecting national property. This Act has executed substantial reforms after tiding over many political obstacles ; equal protection among state ownership, collective ownership and private ownership, unification of registration system, automatic renewal of the Right for using of Residential Site or Construction Site when the term is due, etc. Moreover this Law has declared the doctrine of legalism and carried more throughly it through protecting real rights, prohibiting infringement on them, and regulating reasonable compensation when a private property is expropriated. This Act has enhanced recognition of private ownership one step ahead.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 중국물권법의 내용
      Ⅲ. 우리 법과의 비교
      Ⅳ. 결론
      【참고문헌】
      [Abstract]
    • Ⅰ. 서론
      Ⅱ. 중국물권법의 내용
      Ⅲ. 우리 법과의 비교
      Ⅳ. 결론
      【참고문헌】
      [Abstract]
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "關於物權法的若干問題 中國民法年刊2004" 法律出版社 2006

    2 "關於 中華人民共和國物權法(草案)>的說明" 人民日報(海外版) 2007.3.7

    3 "全人大法律委員會關于中華人民共和國物權法(草案)修改情況的匯報" 法律出版社 2007

    4 "中華人民共和國物權法釋義" 法律出版社 2007

    5 "中華人民共和國物權法條文理解與適用" 人民法院出版社 2007

    6 "中華人民共和國 物權法" 中國法制出版社 2007

    7 "中國物權法草案建議稿及說明" 中國法制出版社 2001

    8 "中國物權法草案建議稿-條文ㆍ說明ㆍ理由與參考立法例" 社會科學 文獻出版社 2000

    9 "中國物權法成立の經緯と意義" 有斐閣 (1336) : 2007

    10 "中國物權法 -條文と解說" 成文堂 2007

    1 "關於物權法的若干問題 中國民法年刊2004" 法律出版社 2006

    2 "關於 中華人民共和國物權法(草案)>的說明" 人民日報(海外版) 2007.3.7

    3 "全人大法律委員會關于中華人民共和國物權法(草案)修改情況的匯報" 法律出版社 2007

    4 "中華人民共和國物權法釋義" 法律出版社 2007

    5 "中華人民共和國物權法條文理解與適用" 人民法院出版社 2007

    6 "中華人民共和國 物權法" 中國法制出版社 2007

    7 "中國物權法草案建議稿及說明" 中國法制出版社 2001

    8 "中國物權法草案建議稿-條文ㆍ說明ㆍ理由與參考立法例" 社會科學 文獻出版社 2000

    9 "中國物權法成立の經緯と意義" 有斐閣 (1336) : 2007

    10 "中國物權法 -條文と解說" 成文堂 2007

    11 "中國における物權行爲論の展開" (292) : 2003

    12 "中國における新しい物權法の槪要と假譯" 商事法務 857 : 2007.5

    13 "一部違背憲法和背社會主義基本原則的‘物權法’草案 - 爲‘憲法’第12條和86年‘民法通則’第73條的廢除的公開信"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼