RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    FAST program 과 중등 과학 교과서 의 탐구 활동 비교 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3255259

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to verify whether the FAST program is the Inquiry Science Curricular Materials, through the Comparison and Analysis of Inquiry Activities between the FAST program and our Secondary Science Books. The results of this study are as follows: 1. FAST has 226 tasks of the Inquiry Activities, which is analyzed over two times than our text. 2. In level one, FAST holds the parts of Synthesizing Results and Evaluation, Hypothesizing and Designing an Experiment but these aren`t found in our text. 3. In level two, our text is analyzed No Discussion 72.2%, Demonstraing or Verifying the Content of the Text 82%, but FAST has Discussion Guided 81.8, and isn`t found any tesk of Demonstrating or Verifying the Content of the text. 4. In level three, our text is exposed a typical type I and analyzed Inquiry Index 15-25 (Middle), but FAST is found type IV, excepting Manipulating Apparatus and Observation and analyzed Inquiry Index over 35 (Very - High). Therefore, FAST Program is proved to be the desirable Inquiry Science Curricular Materials. In future, this worker is to arrange the results of the following paper as follows ; 1. The verification of the FAST Program by means of the Integrated Science Curricular Materials. 2. The development of the Inquiring, Integrated Science Curricular Materials through the results of the preceding study.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to verify whether the FAST program is the Inquiry Science Curricular Materials, through the Comparison and Analysis of Inquiry Activities between the FAST program and our Secondary Science Books. The results of this study...

    The purpose of this study is to verify whether the FAST program is the Inquiry Science Curricular Materials, through the Comparison and Analysis of Inquiry Activities between the FAST program and our Secondary Science Books. The results of this study are as follows: 1. FAST has 226 tasks of the Inquiry Activities, which is analyzed over two times than our text. 2. In level one, FAST holds the parts of Synthesizing Results and Evaluation, Hypothesizing and Designing an Experiment but these aren`t found in our text. 3. In level two, our text is analyzed No Discussion 72.2%, Demonstraing or Verifying the Content of the Text 82%, but FAST has Discussion Guided 81.8, and isn`t found any tesk of Demonstrating or Verifying the Content of the text. 4. In level three, our text is exposed a typical type I and analyzed Inquiry Index 15-25 (Middle), but FAST is found type IV, excepting Manipulating Apparatus and Observation and analyzed Inquiry Index over 35 (Very - High). Therefore, FAST Program is proved to be the desirable Inquiry Science Curricular Materials. In future, this worker is to arrange the results of the following paper as follows ; 1. The verification of the FAST Program by means of the Integrated Science Curricular Materials. 2. The development of the Inquiring, Integrated Science Curricular Materials through the results of the preceding study.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼