RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      改革時期 中國의 勞動者와 勞動運動 = Chinese Workers and Labor Movements in the Reform Era

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76394923

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This essay aims at enhancing our understanding on labor movements in post-reform China in the context of the socialist system. In order to do this analyzes voluntary collective actions and resistance by Chinese workers in three different periods.
      The most fundamental dynamics of Chinese labor movements are the three-way relationships among the Chinese Communist Party(CCP), formal labor unions, and individual workers. Chinese workers, for their part, have long responded to the on-and-off political opportunity structure under the limitations of the fragmented and authoritarian political system. Labor unions also tried hard to distance themselves or become independent from the party, especially when the party leadership is divided over power and policy.
      Since the late 1970s and continuing to date the launching of the reform and open-door drive has come with a fundamental shift in national labor policy and with the decline of the worker's political and economic status. Labor movements thus followed suit, and labor unions also actively sought for a now status as social groups by taking a host of reform measures. In particular, due largely to the introduction of the "marketization" measures and the modern enterprise system in 1992, the state's social control mechanism was decentralized and the danwei("unit") - the traditional redistribution mechanism - was replaced with the market. As a result, the power of company managers was strengthened, whereas the workers, the masters of the socialist states, became subject to the increasingly despotic labor process.
      It is important to note that while labor resistance in the early and mid-1990s was made by individual workers who had been marginalized and displaced, labor movements after the restructuring of the state-owned enterprises(SOEs) in 1997 were mostly engineered by the workers who had previously been protected by the socialist system. It is this process of marginalization, against which Chinese labor movements in the 1990s should be understood. Moreover, such resistance tends to transcend the erstwhile limits of space and issue-areas and might develop into an organized social movement in the future. While it is true that the major issues of the current labor movements remain those of economic nature, it cannot be ruled out that - when combined with the corruption and malpractices of the bureaucrats, menagers, and entrepreneurs - they could turn to a far more explosive movement of political nature. It is then their survival that matters.
      번역하기

      This essay aims at enhancing our understanding on labor movements in post-reform China in the context of the socialist system. In order to do this analyzes voluntary collective actions and resistance by Chinese workers in three different periods. Th...

      This essay aims at enhancing our understanding on labor movements in post-reform China in the context of the socialist system. In order to do this analyzes voluntary collective actions and resistance by Chinese workers in three different periods.
      The most fundamental dynamics of Chinese labor movements are the three-way relationships among the Chinese Communist Party(CCP), formal labor unions, and individual workers. Chinese workers, for their part, have long responded to the on-and-off political opportunity structure under the limitations of the fragmented and authoritarian political system. Labor unions also tried hard to distance themselves or become independent from the party, especially when the party leadership is divided over power and policy.
      Since the late 1970s and continuing to date the launching of the reform and open-door drive has come with a fundamental shift in national labor policy and with the decline of the worker's political and economic status. Labor movements thus followed suit, and labor unions also actively sought for a now status as social groups by taking a host of reform measures. In particular, due largely to the introduction of the "marketization" measures and the modern enterprise system in 1992, the state's social control mechanism was decentralized and the danwei("unit") - the traditional redistribution mechanism - was replaced with the market. As a result, the power of company managers was strengthened, whereas the workers, the masters of the socialist states, became subject to the increasingly despotic labor process.
      It is important to note that while labor resistance in the early and mid-1990s was made by individual workers who had been marginalized and displaced, labor movements after the restructuring of the state-owned enterprises(SOEs) in 1997 were mostly engineered by the workers who had previously been protected by the socialist system. It is this process of marginalization, against which Chinese labor movements in the 1990s should be understood. Moreover, such resistance tends to transcend the erstwhile limits of space and issue-areas and might develop into an organized social movement in the future. While it is true that the major issues of the current labor movements remain those of economic nature, it cannot be ruled out that - when combined with the corruption and malpractices of the bureaucrats, menagers, and entrepreneurs - they could turn to a far more explosive movement of political nature. It is then their survival that matters.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 개혁초기시기(1984~1989년): 사회주의 노동자들의 저항
      • 3. 개혁확장시기(1992~1997년): 주변부 노동자들의 저항
      • 4. 중심으로부터의 이탈(1997년 이후)
      • 5. 결론: 중국 노동계급의 재형성
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 개혁초기시기(1984~1989년): 사회주의 노동자들의 저항
      • 3. 개혁확장시기(1992~1997년): 주변부 노동자들의 저항
      • 4. 중심으로부터의 이탈(1997년 이후)
      • 5. 결론: 중국 노동계급의 재형성
      • 참고문헌
      • 영문초록
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-04-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 신아세아질서연구회 -> 신아시아연구소 KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 신아세아
      외국어명 : NEW ASIA
      KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.61
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.44 1.035 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼