RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    국고보조금의 법적 성격과 집행의 실효성확보 강화방안에 대한 고찰 = A Study on the Legal Character of Government Subsidies and the Institutional Tools for Enhancing the Effectiveness of Subsidized Programs

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Government subsidies are a form of fiscal grants that are allocated to specific administrative tasks or programs of private sector or local government entities. The budget of government subsidies for FY 2011 amount to KRW 43.7 trillion, or 14.1% of the government budget(KRW 309.1 trillion), and the ratio of government subsidies has grown every year. On the other hand, subsidized programs are implemented by private or local government entities, leading to a significant number of illegally or in appropriately executed subsidy programs according to the Board of Audit and Inspection. Therefore, ensuring the effectiveness of subsidized programs as become a key task in order to ensure the efficient management of budgetary funds and achievement of allocation objectives, Until now, discussions on government subsidies have been conducted in terms of public administration and fiscal management from the perspective of intergovernmental transfer of funds. In this regard, this study aims to review the current Framework Act on the Budget and Management of Government Subsidies, and the proposed revision bill submitted by the government to the National Assembly, to identify the institutional tools for ensuring effectiveness as well as current limitations. The study will also seek to propose the introduction of additional measures to enhance the effectiveness of government subsidies. This study reviews the possible introduction of additional charges and public release of lists that contain unlawful concessionaires. Firstly, when subsidized programs are cancelled due to illegal or inappropriate execution, mandatory collection of cancelled subsidies is legally enforced. However, there are no legal stipulations on the collection of interest for delayed return of subsidies. As a result, this may lead to an inappropriate situation where unethical concessionaires can gain profits. Therefore, there is a need to include a legal basis for the collection of additional charges in the Framework Act on Government Subsidies. Furthermore, the central government entity has limitations in monitoring and overseeing more than 1,100 programs implemented by subsidized concessionaires in the private sector. Therefore, there is a need for the introduction of a system under which a list of unlawful concessionaires that have violated orders in the past is kept and managed. While administrative actions through subsidies are inevitable, and the amount of subsidies is increasing due to rising social welfare and regional development programs, the reality presents frequent unlawful and inappropriate execution of subsidies. In this regard, it is of utmost importance to ensure the effectiveness of government subsidies to achieve the intended objectives and maximize fiscal efficiency. Through additional measures for ensuring effectiveness, fiscal democracy could also be strengthened.
    번역하기

    Government subsidies are a form of fiscal grants that are allocated to specific administrative tasks or programs of private sector or local government entities. The budget of government subsidies for FY 2011 amount to KRW 43.7 trillion, or 14.1% of th...

    Government subsidies are a form of fiscal grants that are allocated to specific administrative tasks or programs of private sector or local government entities. The budget of government subsidies for FY 2011 amount to KRW 43.7 trillion, or 14.1% of the government budget(KRW 309.1 trillion), and the ratio of government subsidies has grown every year. On the other hand, subsidized programs are implemented by private or local government entities, leading to a significant number of illegally or in appropriately executed subsidy programs according to the Board of Audit and Inspection. Therefore, ensuring the effectiveness of subsidized programs as become a key task in order to ensure the efficient management of budgetary funds and achievement of allocation objectives, Until now, discussions on government subsidies have been conducted in terms of public administration and fiscal management from the perspective of intergovernmental transfer of funds. In this regard, this study aims to review the current Framework Act on the Budget and Management of Government Subsidies, and the proposed revision bill submitted by the government to the National Assembly, to identify the institutional tools for ensuring effectiveness as well as current limitations. The study will also seek to propose the introduction of additional measures to enhance the effectiveness of government subsidies. This study reviews the possible introduction of additional charges and public release of lists that contain unlawful concessionaires. Firstly, when subsidized programs are cancelled due to illegal or inappropriate execution, mandatory collection of cancelled subsidies is legally enforced. However, there are no legal stipulations on the collection of interest for delayed return of subsidies. As a result, this may lead to an inappropriate situation where unethical concessionaires can gain profits. Therefore, there is a need to include a legal basis for the collection of additional charges in the Framework Act on Government Subsidies. Furthermore, the central government entity has limitations in monitoring and overseeing more than 1,100 programs implemented by subsidized concessionaires in the private sector. Therefore, there is a need for the introduction of a system under which a list of unlawful concessionaires that have violated orders in the past is kept and managed. While administrative actions through subsidies are inevitable, and the amount of subsidies is increasing due to rising social welfare and regional development programs, the reality presents frequent unlawful and inappropriate execution of subsidies. In this regard, it is of utmost importance to ensure the effectiveness of government subsidies to achieve the intended objectives and maximize fiscal efficiency. Through additional measures for ensuring effectiveness, fiscal democracy could also be strengthened.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2008

    2 김용섭, "행정행위의 부관에 관한 법리" 행정법이론실무학회 (2) : 1998

    3 김치환, "행정집행법제의 개선방안 연구" 한국법제연구원 2004

    4 정하중, "행정법총론" 법문사 2005

    5 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2004

    6 김동희, "행정법(Ⅰ)" 박영사 2009

    7 정남철, "지방재정지원제도에 관한 법제연구(Ⅱ)-보조금" 한국법제연구원 2008

    8 권오성, "주요국 지방재정지원제도 분석" 행정연구원 2006

    9 이상규, "신행정법론(하)" 법문사 1994

    10 경제기획원, "보조금의 예산 및 관리에 관한 법률해설"

    1 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2008

    2 김용섭, "행정행위의 부관에 관한 법리" 행정법이론실무학회 (2) : 1998

    3 김치환, "행정집행법제의 개선방안 연구" 한국법제연구원 2004

    4 정하중, "행정법총론" 법문사 2005

    5 박균성, "행정법강의" 박영사 2004

    6 김동희, "행정법(Ⅰ)" 박영사 2009

    7 정남철, "지방재정지원제도에 관한 법제연구(Ⅱ)-보조금" 한국법제연구원 2008

    8 권오성, "주요국 지방재정지원제도 분석" 행정연구원 2006

    9 이상규, "신행정법론(하)" 법문사 1994

    10 경제기획원, "보조금의 예산 및 관리에 관한 법률해설"

    11 한건우, "보조금의 예산 및 관리에 관한 법률상의 보조금행정" 한국법학원 31 (31): 1998

    12 김병기, "보조금의 법적 성질과 보조금교부결정 취소사유 - ‘대법원 2007. 3. 30. 선고 2006두16984 판결’을 중심으로" 한국토지공법학회 43 (43): 593-614, 2009

    13 김용섭, "보조금교부결정취소를 둘러싼 법적 문제" 판례월보사 (408) : 2004

    14 지원림, "민법강의" 박영사 2010

    15 감사원 홈페이지, "민간단체보조금지원 실태"

    16 김해룡, "국세징수법상 관허사업제한제도에 관한 입법 평가" 한국법제연구원 2008

    17 김정훈, "국고보조금제도 개선방안" 한국조세연구원 2008

    18 강구철, "강의행정법(Ⅰ)" 학연사 1993

    19 행정안전부, "2009년 지자체 예산개요"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-04-24 학회명변경 영문명 : The Law Research Institute Konkuk University -> The Institute of Legal Studies Konkuk University KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.65 0.65 0.55
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.52 0.724 0.34
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼