코스닥기업의 부채만기구조 결정요인 분석 = A Study on Determinants of Debt Maturity Structure of Listed Companies on the KOSDAQ Market

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 코스닥시장 기업의 부채만기구조 결정요인을 분석하였다. 실증적 분석대상기간은 2002년 1월부터 2011년 12월까지 10개년이며 분석기간 자료가 이용 가능한 324개 기업의 2916개 패널자료를 선정하여 최소자승법에 의한 회귀분석과 더불어 고정효과모형과 확률효과모형으로 회귀분석하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 유가증권시장을 대상으로 한 국내 선행연구에서와 같이 코스닥 시장에서도 기업규모, 자산만기, 레버리지는 부채만기에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 결정요인으로 확인되었다. 코스닥기업도 기업규모가 클수록 상대적으로 대출조건이 양호한 장기부채를 많이 이용하며 자산만기가 긴 유형자산을 많이 보유할수록 장기부채를 많이 이용하는 것으로 자산만 기대응가설을 지지하였다. 레버리지가 높은 기업은 재무위험이 증가함으로 유동성위험을 회피하기 위하여 장기부채를 많이 이용하는 것으로 보인다. 둘째, 국내 선행연구에서 부채만기 결정요인 변수로 사용되지 않은 유동성과 이익변동성이 부채만기에 미치는 영향 분석에서 유동성은 부채만기에 정(+)의 유의적인 영향을 미치는 변수로 확인되었으며 이익변동성은 부채만기에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 셋째, 코스닥기업에서 성장옵션, 기업우량성, 법인세율은 부채만기에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하였으며 성장옵션에 따른 과소투자문제와 관련한 대리비용가설, 신호가설, 세금가설은 지지하지 않았다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Purpose of this study is to investigate the determinants of debt maturity structure listed companies on the KOSDAQ(Korea Securities Dealers Automated Quotations) market, the data is based on the 2,916 firm-year observations during the sample period from 2002 to 2011. For panel data regression analysis, I use fixed effect regression model and randon effect regression model in addition to OLS model.
As a result of this analysis, the firm size is significantly positively related to debt maturity. I also find the relationship between asset maturity and debt maturity is positively related in accordance with the matching principle which corporate debt maturity is matched to the maturity of assets in place. Financial leverage is found to be significantly positive relationship with debt maturity structure. Liquidity ratio is also significantly positively related to debt maturity. So firms with higher liquidity balances tends to lengthen their debt maturity.
MV/BV as a proxy of growth option and earnings growth as a proxy of firm's quality are not significantly related to debt maturity structure. Corporate tax has not significant relationship with debt maturity. Operating earnings volatility is tend to negatively related to debt maturity but is not significant level. This study did not support signalling hypothesis under the asymmetric information and tax hypothesis.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• <요약>
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경과 선행연구
• Ⅲ. 실증적 연구방법
• Ⅳ. 실증적 연구결과 분석과 해석
• Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "주식통계"

2 박순식, "상장제조기업의 기업규모별 부채만기구조 결정요인에 관한 연구" 18 (18): 27-55, 2001

3 정경수, "부채만기의 결정요인에 관한 연구" 13 (13): 301-326, 1998

4 김지수, "기업의 부채만기 결정요인에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 17 (17): 253-288, 2004

5 Myers, S. C, "The Paradox of Liquidity" 113 : 733-771, 1998

6 Barclay, M. J, "The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt" 50 : 609-631, 1995

7 Guedes, J, "The Determinants of the Maturity of Corporate Debt Issues" 51 : 1809-1833, 1996

8 Alcock, J, "The Determinants of Debt Maturity in Australian Firms" SSRN 2010

9 Antoniou, A, "The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure : Evidence from France, Germany, and the UK" 12 (12): 161-194, 2006

10 Stohs, M. H, "The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure" 69 : 279-312, 1996

11 Dennis, S, "The Determinants of Contract Terms in Bank Revolving Credit Agreements" 35 : 87-110, 2000

12 Scherr F. C, "The Debt Maturity Structure of Small Firms"

13 Hutchinson, R. W, "The Capital Structure and Investment Decisions of the Small Owner-Managed Firm: Some Exploratory Issues" 7 : 231-239, 1995

14 Mitchell, K, "The Call, Sinking Fund and Term to Maturity Features of Corporate Bonds: An Empirical Investigation" 26 : 201-222, 1991

15 Petersen, M. A, "The Benefits of Lending Relationships: Evidence from Small Business Data" 49 : 3-37, 1994

16 Harwood, E, "Tax Clienteles and Debt Maturity" Boston College 1998

17 Leland, H. E, "Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads" 51 : 987-1019, 1996

18 Brick, I. E, "On the Relevance of Debt Maturity Structure" 40 : 1423-1437, 1985

19 Sarkar, S, "Liquidity Risk, Project Characteristics, and the Optimal Maturity of Corporate Debt" 22 : 353-370, 1999

20 Dang, V. A, "Leverage, Debt Maturity and Firm Investment : An Empirical Analysis" SSRN 2010

21 Queen, M, "Firm Mortality: Using Market Indicators to Predict Survival" 43 : 9-26, 1987

22 Van Auken, H. E, "Financial Strategies of Small, Public Firms: A Comparative Analysis with Small, Private Firms and Large, Public Firms" 20 : 29-41, 1995

23 Morris, J. R, "Factors Affecting the Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt" College of Business and Administration, University of Colorado 1992

24 Shah, A, "Empirical Investigation of Debt Maturity Structure : Evidence from Pakistan" SSRN 2009

25 Myers, S. C., "Determinants of Corporate Borrowing" 5 : 147-175, 1977

26 Hart, O, "Debt and Seniority: An Analysis of the Roleof Hard Claims in Constraining Management" 85 : 567-585, 1995

27 Kane, A, "Debt Policy and Rate of Return Premium to Leverage" 20 : 479-499, 1985

28 Diamond, D. W, "Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk" 106 : 709-737, 1991

29 Myers, S. C, "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have" 13 : 187-221, 1984

30 Flannery, M, "Asymmetric Information and Risky Debt Maturity Choice" 41 : 18-38, 1986

31 Ozkan, A, "An Empirical Analysis of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure" 6 : 197-212, 2000

32 Barnea, A, "A Rationale for Debt Maturity Structure and Call Provisions in the Agency Theory Framework" 35 : 1223-1234, 1980