가정법원의 문제점과 개선방안 = The Present Situations and Problems of the Family Court and Proposal of Policies for Change

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recently our society has been experiencing situations like sudden hike in the divorce rates, decline in the birthrates, violence in the families, all of which have contributed to the climax in the crisis of ""family breakup"", triggering the amendment of the laws in the direction of the government looking after family problems and resolution of the problems. At the same time, Family Court is demanded not only for its traditional ability, to solve problems by trials, but also to look after the welfare of children and women who are relatively in the weaker position, mediation and reconciliation to solve disputes, and welfare services related to families. However, our Family court and family trial systems do not seem to reflect all these needs.
The following are the problems of the Family Court. (1) Family Courts are only installed in large cities such as Seoul, therefore not providing equal justice services to citizens in other areas. (2) Specialties such as judicial and examiners are lacking substantially in number. (3) In operation of the family trial, it takes a long time to wait for a trial but there aren’t any sincere mediations or judgements. (4) Divorce by agreement systems were improved, but there is a lack of programs such as making both parents agree on child caring in the process of divorce and people in charge. (5) In a divorce, trials have unnecessary problems that deal with a lot of emotions because of fault-based divorce, and lack of consideration for support in separationof properties. (6) The children of divorced families may not receive fostering expenses during the trial, and even after the trial they experience difficulties since the process of receiving it are very complicated.
To solve these kinds of problems I suggest these solutions. (1) Establishment of Family Courts all over the country, (2) facility improvement of Family Courts, (3) increase the number of judges and examiners, (4) make mediation more effective and specialized, (5) quick dealing with the cases and trials considering the unique characteristics of family trials, (6) protecting women and children who are in a relatively lower position in things such as separation of properties and fostering expenses, (7) In addition, counseling facilities run by the executive branch and civilians, social welfare service centers, children welfare service centers, protection centers for victims from violence in families, and the Family Court isn’t well related right now, but connecting and using them systematically will maximize the effect even with a small budget. Looking at a long term, there needs fundamental solutions such as reforming family courts and the civil court by separating them as having a different organization and a system of personal management, strengthen the relations with the executive branch, and boldly increase the welfare budget. The welfare needed for solving problems related to family isn’t a problem to be just left entirely to the Family Court but something that needs to be solved by the government by actively intensifying welfare services.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 가정법원의 현황과 문제점
• Ⅲ. 개선방안
• Ⅳ. 결 론

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김매경, "협의이혼제도 어떻게 바꿀 것인가?" 2005

2 김상용, "한부모 가정의 자녀 양육비 확보를 위한 제도개선방안" 2002

3 허미화, "한국사회의 이혼율 증가 원인 및 이혼가정 아동의 부적응에 관한 문헌적 고찰" 6 (6): 2002

4 박부진, "한국사회의 이혼실태와 이혼가족의 문제" 9 :

5 이동연, "지역사회 전문가 및 사회복지 관련 기관과의 연계?협조방안" 112 :

6 전경근, "적정한 양육비의 산정 및 확보방안에 관한 연구"

7 전주혜, "재산분할에 대한 판결례 분석" 家事裁判硏究Ⅰ 2007

8 이종한, "이혼제도와 실태" 5 (5): 2000

9 조은희, "이혼의 자유와 그 한계― 협의이혼제도 개정법안을 중심으로" 한국가족법학회 21 (21): 133-164, 2007

10 이정엽, "이혼으로 인한 위자료 산정 기준에 관한 소고, 가사재판연구Ⅰ" 서울가정법원 가사재판연구회

11 오상진, "이혼원인에 있어 유책주의와 파탄주의" 101 :

12 이은정, "이혼시 자녀양육비 지급확보방안에 관한 연구" 2007

13 김정권, "이혼사건의 조정활성화를 위한 약간의 고찰" 2005

14 이림, "이혼부부의 자녀와의 면접교섭권" 101 :

15 차경환, "위자료산정 및 재산분할 심리의 실무현황" 2008

16 박종용, "우책배우자의 이혼청구와 허용기준" 20 (20):

17 박영식, "외부에서 본 가사재판 실무의 문제점과 개선방안" 2008

18 정승원, "양육사항과 친권자 결정에 관한 제문제" 2008

19 윤진, "아동의 사법절차상 청문 절차적 정의와 법의 지배"

20 한숙희, "서울가정법원 가사조사관의 운영개선방안" 서울가정법원 가사재판연구회 2007

21 정현숙, "사회?경제?인구학적 요인과 이혼율과의 관계" 26 (26): 2008

22 법원행정처, "사법연감 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006"

23 김상규, "부부재산제 개정을 위한 하나의 대안" 2006

24 법원행정처, "법원실무제요(가사), 개정증보, 법원행정처"

25 김상규, "면접교섭권" 2002

26 서울가정법원 협의이혼절차연구회, "개정민법에 따른 협의이혼절차”(미간행)"

27 김상규, "가정법원의 장기적 발전방안 ―인적?물적 구성을 중심으로―" 2005

28 김상규, "가정법원의 새로운 역할과 운영개선의 필요성" 재판자료

29 김용욱, "가정법원과 가사소송의 비교법적 소고" (5) : 1991

30 송현종, "가정법원 조사관 제도에 관한 소고" 11 :

31 박우동, "가정법원 20년의 회고와 전만" 18 : 1983

32 김원태, "가사조정제도의문제점과 과제" 13 (13): 2006

33 한숙희, "가사조정의 개선방안" 2007

34 나영아, "가사조사관의 역할" 2008

35 문준필, "가사소송절차의 문제점과 개선방향" 18 (18): 2004

36 선재성, "가사소송에서의 신모델의 향후과제" 106 :

37 김연, "가사소송법상 효율적인 이행확보방안 마련에 관한 연구" 10 (10): 2006

38 서울가정법원 가사소년제도개혁위원회, "가사소년제도개혁위원회 자료집 Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ"

39 김주영, "1970년대, 1980년대, 1990년대의 비교를 통한 이혼의 특성변화 연구" 성균관대학교 가정관리학회 15 : 1996