RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전자교육 플랫폼 평가도구의 개발 및 타당화 = Development and Validation of an Evaluation Tool for e-Learning Platforms

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959884

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to develop the reliable and valid evaluation tool of evaluating and selecting e-learning platforms, or learning management systems. To achieve that goal, factor analysis, reliability analysis and formative evaluation have been adopted. With total 81 items developed through the criteria framework, a survey was carried out among 163 e-learning experts in order to ensure how important they are. To derive a concise list of explanatory constructs from the responses collected from 133 respondents, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was performed. As a result of it, two main factors(factor 1, factor 2) were extracted. Factor 1 was labeled instruction management, screen design & technology and factor 2 interaction & evaluation. And factor 1 and factor 2 were respectively interpreted consisting of four sub-factors and three ones. Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) was carried out to assess the degree to which the plausibility of factor models is empirically confirmed, Overall fit measures (RMSEA, CFI, NNFI), indexes that show the suitablility of the model were quite good. Reliability estimates using Cronbach`s alpha indicated that the evaluation tool had good internal consistency. The formative evaluation of three Korean platforms was performed. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparison were conducted with the responses collected from 65 respondents. And during that evaluation, several problems including the ambiguity of items happened. But it seemed that most of them were derived from the indirect evaluation method by using CD-ROM. They were not critical in deciding that the evaluation tool itself is valid and reliable. It is concluded that the evaluation tool for e-Learning platforms is very valid and reliable.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to develop the reliable and valid evaluation tool of evaluating and selecting e-learning platforms, or learning management systems. To achieve that goal, factor analysis, reliability analysis and formative evaluation have...

    The purpose of this study was to develop the reliable and valid evaluation tool of evaluating and selecting e-learning platforms, or learning management systems. To achieve that goal, factor analysis, reliability analysis and formative evaluation have been adopted. With total 81 items developed through the criteria framework, a survey was carried out among 163 e-learning experts in order to ensure how important they are. To derive a concise list of explanatory constructs from the responses collected from 133 respondents, exploratory factor analysis(EFA) was performed. As a result of it, two main factors(factor 1, factor 2) were extracted. Factor 1 was labeled instruction management, screen design & technology and factor 2 interaction & evaluation. And factor 1 and factor 2 were respectively interpreted consisting of four sub-factors and three ones. Confirmatory factor analysis(CFA) was carried out to assess the degree to which the plausibility of factor models is empirically confirmed, Overall fit measures (RMSEA, CFI, NNFI), indexes that show the suitablility of the model were quite good. Reliability estimates using Cronbach`s alpha indicated that the evaluation tool had good internal consistency. The formative evaluation of three Korean platforms was performed. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc multiple comparison were conducted with the responses collected from 65 respondents. And during that evaluation, several problems including the ambiguity of items happened. But it seemed that most of them were derived from the indirect evaluation method by using CD-ROM. They were not critical in deciding that the evaluation tool itself is valid and reliable. It is concluded that the evaluation tool for e-Learning platforms is very valid and reliable.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼