시장원리 확대와 개인사회서비스의 변화 = 영국의 사례

국문 초록 (Abstract)

사회서비스에서 시장원리 확대는 재원조달, 공급 주체, 의사결정권과 서비스의 배분방식, 규제와 같은 여러 차원을 종합적으로 고려해야 하는 복합적인 현상이다. 영국은 대처 정부하에서 재원조달, 공급 주체와 서비스 배분차원에서 민간의 역할과 시장원리를 확대한 반면, 중앙정부에 의한 규제는 강화하였다. 정책의 우선적인 목표였던 국가의 부담 억제는 달성하였으나, 공적인 서비스의 수혜자 수는 줄어들었다. 서비스가 더 유연화되고 지역사회서비스가 강화된 반면, 욕구가 큰 계층에게 서비스가 집중되면서 예방 기능은 약해졌다. 소득이 낮고, 욕구가 큰 계층에게 집중적으로 서비스를 제공하게 된 반면, 중간계층이 서비스에서 소외되는 양극화가 문제로 제기되었다. 구매와 공급을 분리한 준시장방식은 효율성이나 소비자 선택권의 강화에 기여하지 못했다는 평가가 많다. 영국의 사례는 서비스의 질과 공공성을 높이기 위한 규제의 강화, 서비스의 보편성 확대, 전달체계간 연계의 강화, 재정분권에 대한 재검토 필요성 등의 시사점을 우리나라에 제시하고 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The extension of market principle in personal social service may proceed along with various dimensions: funding mechanism, service provision, decision making power and regulation. In the UK, Thatcher government extended market principle in terms of funding, service provision and decision making power. On the other hand, regulation by the central government was strengthened. The public cost of personal social service was contained, but the quantity of service was decreased. While the flexibility of service was enhanced, the prevention function of social care diminished. Care service for the most needy was improved at the cost of middle income group. The expected efficiency gain was not materialized due to the limit of quasi-market mechanism. The UK case provides some implications for Korea: the necessity of proper regulation, expanding universality of service provision, close cooperation between delivery system and the necessity of reconsidering the decentralization of budget for welfare services.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
• Ⅱ. 시장원리 확대에 대한 다차원적 접근
• Ⅲ. 영국에서의 시장원리 확대와 서비스 변화
• Ⅳ. 시장원리 확대의 효과에 대한 평가
• Ⅴ. 맺음말
• 참고문헌
• abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 강혜규, "사회서비스 공급의 역할분담 모형개발과 정책과제-국가·시장·비영리민간의 재정 분담 및 공급참여 방식" 한국보건사회연구원 2007

2 Badlock, J., "“Social Care in the United Kingdom: A Pattern of Discretionary Social Administration.” In The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations" Edward Elgar 109-141, 2003

3 Anttonen, A., "“Pattern of Social Care in Five Industrial Societies: Explaining Diversity.” In The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Nations" Edward Elgar 2003

4 Hill, M., "“Origins of the Local Authority Social Services.” In Local Authority Social Services: An Introduction" Blackwell Publisherspp 22-37, 2000

5 Bartlett, H., "“Models of Care.” In Social Care and Social Exclusion: A Comparative Study of Older People’s Care in Europe" Palgrave 27-41, 2001

6 Daly, M., "“Introduction: Conceptualising Social Care in the Context of Welfare State Restructuring.” In Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe" Ashgate 1-24, 1998

7 Blackman, T, "“Conclusion: Issues and Solutions.” In Social Care and Social Exclusion: A Comparative Study of Older People’s Care in Europe" Palgrave 181-205, 2001

8 Steuerle, C. E., "“Common Issues for Voucher Programs.” In Vouchers and the Provision of Public Services" Brookings Institution Press 1-37, 2000

9 Lowe, R, "The Welfare State in Britain since 1945" Palgrave 2005

10 Commission for Social Care Inspection(CSCI)/UK, "The State of Social Care in England 2005-06" 2006

11 Bahle, T., "The Changing Institutionalization of Social Services in England and Wales, France, Germany: Is the Welfare State on the Retreat?" 13 (13): 5-20, 2003

12 Commission for Social Care Inspection(CSCI)/UK, "Social care: Choosing the Right Service for You" 2006

13 Wanless, D., "Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-term View (Wanless Social Care Review)" King's Fund 2006

14 Haynes, P., "Public Policy and Private Provision: Changes in residential care from 1991 to 2001" 14 (14): 499-507, 2006

15 Gibson, D., "Policy Convergence: Restructuring Long-term Care in Australia and the UK" 29 (29): 43-58, 2000

16 Glennerster, H., "Paying for Welfare Towards 2000" Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf 1997

17 Department of Health(DoH)/UK, "Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services" Department of Health/UK 2006

18 Janl?v, A. C., "Older Persons' Experience of Being Assessed for and Receiving Public Home Help: Do They Have Any Influence Over It?" 14 (14): 26-36, 2005

19 Tanner, D., "Older People and Access to Care" 33 : 499-515, 2003

20 Goodship J., "Modernising Regulation or Regulating Modernisation? The Public, Private, and Voluntary Interface in Adult Social Care" 19 (19): 13-27, 2004

21 Player, S., "Long-term Care: From Public Responsibility to Private Good" 21 (21): 231-255, 2001

22 OECD, "Long-Term Care for Older People" 2005

23 Hills, J., "Inequality and the State" Oxford University Press 2004

24 Department of Health(DoH)/UK, "Independence, Well-being and Choice: Our Vision for the Future of Social Care for Adults in England" Department of Health/UK 2005

25 Anttonen, A., "European Social Care Services: Is IT Possible to Identify Models?." 6 (6): 87-100, 1996

26 Grant, W., "Economic Policy in Britain" Palgrave 2002

27 Davey, V., "Direct Payments: A National Survey of Direct Payments Policy and Practice" Personal Social Service Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science 2007

28 Lundsgaard, J., "Consumer Direction and Choice in Long?Term Care for Older Persons, Including Payments for Informal Care: How Can It Help Improve Care Outcomes, Employment and Fiscal Sustainability" OECD 2005

29 Knapp, M., "Commissioning for Quality: Ten Years of Social Care Markets in England" 30 (30): 283-306, 2001

30 Burchardt, T., "Boundaries between Public and Private Welfare: A Typology and Map of Services" CASE, LSE 1997

31 Land, H., ""Gender, Care and the Changing Role of the State in the UK.” In Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe" Ashgate 51-84, 1998