RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Constitutional Change in the American Experience

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82494670

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Change is fundamental to the design of the United States Constitution and yet the nature of legitimate constitutional revision remains intensely controversial. One of the most significant features of the U.S. Constitution is that its framers embraced the idea of its mutability from the very beginning. The architects of the American constitution accepted that future generations must be free to renegotiate the basic charter by which they were governed, both because latent defects in the original design would inevitably be revealed and because social needs and circumstances would inevitably evolve. “[T]he plan now to be formed will certainly be defective,” acknowledged George Mason at the 1787 constitutional convention. “Amendments therefore will be necessary, and it will be better to provide for them, in an easy, regular and Constitutional way than to trust to chance and violence.” Accordingly, alongside the distinct sections (or “Articles”) of the Constitution defining the powers of the President, the legislature, and the courts, the framers included a separate section defining two methods for amending the Constitution. This receptivity to revision is now often taken for granted by Americans, but it is a notable departure from the assumptions of many other legal cultures which have regarded fundamental law as permanent and unchanging.
    번역하기

    Change is fundamental to the design of the United States Constitution and yet the nature of legitimate constitutional revision remains intensely controversial. One of the most significant features of the U.S. Constitution is that its framers embraced ...

    Change is fundamental to the design of the United States Constitution and yet the nature of legitimate constitutional revision remains intensely controversial. One of the most significant features of the U.S. Constitution is that its framers embraced the idea of its mutability from the very beginning. The architects of the American constitution accepted that future generations must be free to renegotiate the basic charter by which they were governed, both because latent defects in the original design would inevitably be revealed and because social needs and circumstances would inevitably evolve. “[T]he plan now to be formed will certainly be defective,” acknowledged George Mason at the 1787 constitutional convention. “Amendments therefore will be necessary, and it will be better to provide for them, in an easy, regular and Constitutional way than to trust to chance and violence.” Accordingly, alongside the distinct sections (or “Articles”) of the Constitution defining the powers of the President, the legislature, and the courts, the framers included a separate section defining two methods for amending the Constitution. This receptivity to revision is now often taken for granted by Americans, but it is a notable departure from the assumptions of many other legal cultures which have regarded fundamental law as permanent and unchanging.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. Constitutional Revision by Formal Amendment: The Article V Process
    • Ⅱ. Constitutional Revision By Other Means: Shifting Constitutional Norms and the “Living Constitution”
    • Ⅲ. Conclusion
    • Ⅰ. Constitutional Revision by Formal Amendment: The Article V Process
    • Ⅱ. Constitutional Revision By Other Means: Shifting Constitutional Norms and the “Living Constitution”
    • Ⅲ. Conclusion
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Max Farrand, "The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 1" 202-203, 1937

    2 Stephen M. Griffin, "Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics. in: in Responding to Imperfection" 49-50,

    3 Erwin Chemerinsky, "Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies7 (3d ed.)" 2006

    4 Sara Pendergast, "Constitutional Amendments: From Freedom of Speech to Flag Burning xlviii" 2001

    1 Max Farrand, "The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, 1" 202-203, 1937

    2 Stephen M. Griffin, "Constitutionalism in the United States: From Theory to Politics. in: in Responding to Imperfection" 49-50,

    3 Erwin Chemerinsky, "Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies7 (3d ed.)" 2006

    4 Sara Pendergast, "Constitutional Amendments: From Freedom of Speech to Flag Burning xlviii" 2001

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.89 0.87 0.967 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼