RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인터넷 사이트를 통해 살펴본 의료사고 및 의료분쟁의 현황에 관한 분석 = The Analysis of the Current Status of Medical Accidents and Disputes Researched in the Korean Web Sites

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101456512

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The increasing tendency of medical disputes is one of the remarkable social phenomena. Especially we must not overlook the phenomenon that production and circulation of information related to medical accidents is increasing rapidly through the internet. In this research, we evaluated the web sites which provide the information related to medical accidents using the keyword "medical accidents" in March 2006, and classified the 28 web sites according to the kinds of establishers. We also analyzed the contents of the sites, and checked and compared the current status of the web sites and problems that have to be improved. Finally, we suggested the possible solutions to prevent medical accidents. The detailed results were listed below. 1. Medical practitioners, general public, and lawyers were all familiar with and prefer the term "medical accidents" mainly. 2. In the number of sites searched by the keyword "medical accidents", lawyer had the most sites and medical practitioners had the least ones. 3. Many sites by general public and lawyers had their own medical record analysts but there was little professional analysts for dentistry. 4. General public were more interested in the prevention of medical accidents but the lawyers were more interested in the process after medical accidents. The sites by medical practitioners dealt with the least remedies of medical accidents, compared with other sites. 5. General public wanted the third party such as government intervention into the disputes including the medical dispute arbitration law or/and the establishment of independent medical dispute judgment institution. 6. In the comparison among the establishers of web sites, medical practitioners dealt with the least examples of medical accidents. 7. The suggestion of cases in counseling articles related to dental accidents were considered less importantly than the reality. 8. Whereas there were many articles about domestic cases related to the bloody dental treatment, in the open counseling articles the number of dental treatment regarding to non insurance treatment was large. 9. In comparing offered information of medical accidents based on the establishers, general public offered vocabularies, lawyers offered related laws and medical practitioners offered medical knowledge relatively. 10. They all cited the news pressed by the media to offer the current status of domestic medical accidents. Especially among the web sites by general public, NGOs provided the plentiful statistical data related to medical accidents. 11. The web sites that collect the medical accidents were only two. As a result of our research, we found out that, in the flood of information, medical disputes can be occurred by the wrong information from third party, and the medical practitioners have the most passive attitudes on the medical accidents. Thus, it is crucial to have the mutual interchange and exchange of information between lawyer, patients and medical practitioners, so that based on clear mutual comprehension we can solve the accidents and disputes more positively and actively.
      번역하기

      The increasing tendency of medical disputes is one of the remarkable social phenomena. Especially we must not overlook the phenomenon that production and circulation of information related to medical accidents is increasing rapidly through the interne...

      The increasing tendency of medical disputes is one of the remarkable social phenomena. Especially we must not overlook the phenomenon that production and circulation of information related to medical accidents is increasing rapidly through the internet. In this research, we evaluated the web sites which provide the information related to medical accidents using the keyword "medical accidents" in March 2006, and classified the 28 web sites according to the kinds of establishers. We also analyzed the contents of the sites, and checked and compared the current status of the web sites and problems that have to be improved. Finally, we suggested the possible solutions to prevent medical accidents. The detailed results were listed below. 1. Medical practitioners, general public, and lawyers were all familiar with and prefer the term "medical accidents" mainly. 2. In the number of sites searched by the keyword "medical accidents", lawyer had the most sites and medical practitioners had the least ones. 3. Many sites by general public and lawyers had their own medical record analysts but there was little professional analysts for dentistry. 4. General public were more interested in the prevention of medical accidents but the lawyers were more interested in the process after medical accidents. The sites by medical practitioners dealt with the least remedies of medical accidents, compared with other sites. 5. General public wanted the third party such as government intervention into the disputes including the medical dispute arbitration law or/and the establishment of independent medical dispute judgment institution. 6. In the comparison among the establishers of web sites, medical practitioners dealt with the least examples of medical accidents. 7. The suggestion of cases in counseling articles related to dental accidents were considered less importantly than the reality. 8. Whereas there were many articles about domestic cases related to the bloody dental treatment, in the open counseling articles the number of dental treatment regarding to non insurance treatment was large. 9. In comparing offered information of medical accidents based on the establishers, general public offered vocabularies, lawyers offered related laws and medical practitioners offered medical knowledge relatively. 10. They all cited the news pressed by the media to offer the current status of domestic medical accidents. Especially among the web sites by general public, NGOs provided the plentiful statistical data related to medical accidents. 11. The web sites that collect the medical accidents were only two. As a result of our research, we found out that, in the flood of information, medical disputes can be occurred by the wrong information from third party, and the medical practitioners have the most passive attitudes on the medical accidents. Thus, it is crucial to have the mutual interchange and exchange of information between lawyer, patients and medical practitioners, so that based on clear mutual comprehension we can solve the accidents and disputes more positively and actively.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "효과적 의료분쟁조정제도의 정립" 7 : 63-66, 1997

      2 "형법상 의료행위와 설명의무" 14 : 221-242, 2003

      3 "한국인터넷통계집" 영진닷컴 2003

      4 "치과임상에서의 의료사고예방 및 처치" 1993

      5 "치과의료시장에서의 인터넷 커뮤니티 활용 방안에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 대학원 2004

      6 "치과의료분쟁 실태조사" 한국소비자보호원 2005

      7 "치과법학 및 의료사고대책" 대한치과의사협회 법제위원회 1992

      8 "치과 임상에서의 의료사고유형에 대한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2002

      9 "최신의료판례" 동림사 2003

      10 "일반대중을 위한 인터넷상의 의약정보의 비교평가" 숙명여자대학교 대학원 2000

      1 "효과적 의료분쟁조정제도의 정립" 7 : 63-66, 1997

      2 "형법상 의료행위와 설명의무" 14 : 221-242, 2003

      3 "한국인터넷통계집" 영진닷컴 2003

      4 "치과임상에서의 의료사고예방 및 처치" 1993

      5 "치과의료시장에서의 인터넷 커뮤니티 활용 방안에 관한 연구" 경희대학교 대학원 2004

      6 "치과의료분쟁 실태조사" 한국소비자보호원 2005

      7 "치과법학 및 의료사고대책" 대한치과의사협회 법제위원회 1992

      8 "치과 임상에서의 의료사고유형에 대한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2002

      9 "최신의료판례" 동림사 2003

      10 "일반대중을 위한 인터넷상의 의약정보의 비교평가" 숙명여자대학교 대학원 2000

      11 "인터넷 의료상담시 주의점; 법률적인 접근; 인터넷 의료상담과 진료관리" 45 : 17-23, 2002

      12 "인터넷 건강정보 소비자의 정보선택기준 및 정보이용행태 조사" 서울대학교 대학원 2002

      13 "의사의 설명의무 위반 책임" 서강대학교 대학원 2003

      14 "의료소비자의 의료분쟁 인식과 그 해결방안" 순천향대학교 대학원 2005

      15 "의료사고에 대한 환경변화와 사고유형, 의료배상책임보험의 필요성" 30 : 110-123, 2001

      16 "의료사고를 경험한 가족들이 의료분쟁을 제기하는 원인에 대한 연구" 203 : 274-291, 1998

      17 "의료사고 전문가가 말하는 의료사고 해결법" 일상 2002

      18 "의료분쟁조정의 법리 을 중심으로" 창원대학교 대학원 1994

      19 "의료분쟁의 합리적 해결방안에 관한 연구" 중앙대학교 대학원 2000

      20 "의료분쟁에 대한 의료기관 직원의 인식도 조사" 인제대학교 대학원 2002

      21 "의료분쟁, 그 질곡의 늪이여" 12 : 7-14, 2004

      22 "의료과오소송법" 박영사 2005

      23 "의료 피해구제의 효율적 처리방안 모색을 위한 세미나" 한국소비자보호원 2006

      24 "의가연보고서 제2호" 의료사고가족연합회 1995

      25 "우리나라와 미국의 의료과오 비교연구" 단국대학교 대학원 2005

      26 "서울특별시 개원 치과의사의 의료사고 및 분쟁의 유형과 대책에 관한 연구(2004년)" 30 : 163-189, 2005

      27 "서울시 개원치과의사의 의료사고 유형 및 대책에 관한 조사연구" 23 : 157-191, 1997

      28 "개원가에서의 의료분쟁에 대한 적절한 대처방안" 임상내과 1 : 92-94, 2003

      29 "Using he Internet to Teach Consumers about Quality" 28 : 83-89, 2002

      30 "An Instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices" 53 : 105-111, 1999

      31 "A History and Theory of Consent" 1986

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-03-19 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한구강내과학회지 -> Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Oral Medicine -> Journal of Oral Medicine and Pain
      KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한구강내과학회 -> 대한안면통증∙구강내과학회
      영문명 : The Korean Academy Of Oral Medicine -> THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF OROFACIAL PAIN AND ORAL MEDICINE
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.06 0.06 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.17 0.243 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼