RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    국회의 경찰예산 심의 내용의 실증 분석 -행안위, 예결특위 회의록 분석을 중심으로- = Actual Analysis on Congress Police Budget -Analysis focused on the records of Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts Police Budget-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82701804

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This Paper discusses about the following implications; Congress Public Administration and Security Committee on Police Budget, of what intentional questions the core budget of Special Committee on the Budget Accounts concentrates and quality intentions show among the police services, as well as, the difference on the ruling and the opposition party. The paper was classified and analyzed through Content Analysis Method using specimen from core details on the police budget of Public Adminstration and Security Committee and Special Committee on Budget Accounts from year 2006 to 2010. After analyzing the data, for questions on Police Budget of Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts are National Safety related budget, Police administration support, Expenses and Criminal Investigation in order, the number of questions are driven to degressive public order activity of the nation rather than proportionating to the total budget on different programs. Second, compared to Special Committee on the Budget Accounts showing a lot of debates on police administrative support, expenses, national life safe in order, the Public Administration and Security Committee shows national life safety, criminal investigation, police administrative support in order. If the Special Committee on the Budget Accounts relatively put importance on the control of police budget as its main duty, the Public Administration and Security Committee discusses more on budget and welfare issues directly related to national life. Third, both Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts shows that they are project cost-orientated while the Standing Committee being project cost-orientated(intentionally) and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts as financial management-orientated, unlike the previous research. Fourth, analyzing the results on relationship of inquiry field and inquiry-oriented(intention), higher flexibility on budget shows in large areas of project cost compared to labor and basic expenses. The Committee agrees that the police budget is in shortage compared to the whole nation`s budget and actively debate on it for improvement. Lastly, in questioning the difference between the ruling and opposition party, there wasn`t much difference shown but there were questions as to ruling party are project-cost based and opposition party as financial management based in different budget details. In the ruling party, the legitimacy and inevitability of budget, they only attempts to receive the budget don`t have legitimate evaluations on the budget and its budget-size letting them to be questioned. Also, in the opposition party, their budget isn`t related on politics issues but is only set in a broad scale. I have concluded that a new paradigm is needed to modify and improve on the budget review.
    번역하기

    This Paper discusses about the following implications; Congress Public Administration and Security Committee on Police Budget, of what intentional questions the core budget of Special Committee on the Budget Accounts concentrates and quality intention...

    This Paper discusses about the following implications; Congress Public Administration and Security Committee on Police Budget, of what intentional questions the core budget of Special Committee on the Budget Accounts concentrates and quality intentions show among the police services, as well as, the difference on the ruling and the opposition party. The paper was classified and analyzed through Content Analysis Method using specimen from core details on the police budget of Public Adminstration and Security Committee and Special Committee on Budget Accounts from year 2006 to 2010. After analyzing the data, for questions on Police Budget of Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts are National Safety related budget, Police administration support, Expenses and Criminal Investigation in order, the number of questions are driven to degressive public order activity of the nation rather than proportionating to the total budget on different programs. Second, compared to Special Committee on the Budget Accounts showing a lot of debates on police administrative support, expenses, national life safe in order, the Public Administration and Security Committee shows national life safety, criminal investigation, police administrative support in order. If the Special Committee on the Budget Accounts relatively put importance on the control of police budget as its main duty, the Public Administration and Security Committee discusses more on budget and welfare issues directly related to national life. Third, both Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts shows that they are project cost-orientated while the Standing Committee being project cost-orientated(intentionally) and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts as financial management-orientated, unlike the previous research. Fourth, analyzing the results on relationship of inquiry field and inquiry-oriented(intention), higher flexibility on budget shows in large areas of project cost compared to labor and basic expenses. The Committee agrees that the police budget is in shortage compared to the whole nation`s budget and actively debate on it for improvement. Lastly, in questioning the difference between the ruling and opposition party, there wasn`t much difference shown but there were questions as to ruling party are project-cost based and opposition party as financial management based in different budget details. In the ruling party, the legitimacy and inevitability of budget, they only attempts to receive the budget don`t have legitimate evaluations on the budget and its budget-size letting them to be questioned. Also, in the opposition party, their budget isn`t related on politics issues but is only set in a broad scale. I have concluded that a new paradigm is needed to modify and improve on the budget review.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이광종, "행정책임론" 대영문화사 2005

    2 이황우, "한국경찰예산의 문제점과 개선과제" 한국공안행정학회 18 (18): 293-324, 2009

    3 이상호, "지방자치에 관한 지방지의 인식과 태도" 35 (35): 335-354, 2001

    4 박종구, "정치적 변동과 예산심의 행태의 변화" 26 (26): 371-387, 1992

    5 함성득, "예산심의 과정에서 국회의 전문성 확보를 위한 조직구성에 대한 연구" 2 : 1996

    6 오상범, "예산심의 과정에 있어서 국회의원의 정책질의 유형에 따른 행태연구" 한남대학교 대학원 2001

    7 국회예산정책처, "성과관리시행계획 수립 및 평가방법" 국회 2007

    8 국회예산정책처, "대한민국 재정 2008)" 국회 2008

    9 나중식, "당파성이 기초의회 예산심의에 미치는 영향분석" 한국정책학회 12 (12): 111-136, 2003

    10 나중식, "기초의회예산심의의 질의-답변성향분석: 부산광역시 부산진구의회와 광주광역시 북구의화의 2-3대 의회의 사례를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 445-468, 2003

    1 이광종, "행정책임론" 대영문화사 2005

    2 이황우, "한국경찰예산의 문제점과 개선과제" 한국공안행정학회 18 (18): 293-324, 2009

    3 이상호, "지방자치에 관한 지방지의 인식과 태도" 35 (35): 335-354, 2001

    4 박종구, "정치적 변동과 예산심의 행태의 변화" 26 (26): 371-387, 1992

    5 함성득, "예산심의 과정에서 국회의 전문성 확보를 위한 조직구성에 대한 연구" 2 : 1996

    6 오상범, "예산심의 과정에 있어서 국회의원의 정책질의 유형에 따른 행태연구" 한남대학교 대학원 2001

    7 국회예산정책처, "성과관리시행계획 수립 및 평가방법" 국회 2007

    8 국회예산정책처, "대한민국 재정 2008)" 국회 2008

    9 나중식, "당파성이 기초의회 예산심의에 미치는 영향분석" 한국정책학회 12 (12): 111-136, 2003

    10 나중식, "기초의회예산심의의 질의-답변성향분석: 부산광역시 부산진구의회와 광주광역시 북구의화의 2-3대 의회의 사례를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 445-468, 2003

    11 민형동, "국회의 경찰통제에 대한 실태 분석: 제16・17・18대 국회의 입법활동・예산결정・국정감사를 중심으로" 한국공안행정학회 19 (19): 105-137, 2010

    12 윤영진, "광역의회의 예산심의 행태에 관한 연구-대구시와 광주시를 중심으로" 27 (27): 1033-1050, 1993

    13 민형동, "경찰청에 대한 국정감사 질의의도 유형 및 감사기준에 관한 연구" 한국경찰학회 12 (12): 77-109, 2010

    14 민형동, "경찰청에 대한 국정감사 질의내용 실증분석 - 2003~2007년 질의내용을 중심으로" 한국경찰학회 11 (11): 99-130, 2009

    15 Wanat, John, "Introduction to Budgeting" Duxbury Press 1978

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.24 1.24 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.09 0.97 1.211 0.55
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼