RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    농지의 사용ㆍ수익에 관한 비교법적 고찰 = A Comparative Study on the Farmland Lease

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82759068

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transactions. Germany has the BGB and the german Landpachtverkehrsgesetz (LPachtVG). France has the Code civil and the Code rural. Thus each country has its own legal system protecting the farmland lessee.
    There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee.
    There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. préfet; superficie minimum d'Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system.
    This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.
    번역하기

    This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transact...

    This article focuses on comparing the Legal system of the Farmland Lease among the three countries(Japan, Germany, and France). Japan has the civil law as general law, while it has the japanese farmland act as special law in field of farmland transactions. Germany has the BGB and the german Landpachtverkehrsgesetz (LPachtVG). France has the Code civil and the Code rural. Thus each country has its own legal system protecting the farmland lessee.
    There are several development patterns regarding the legal system of the farmland lease. In the first stage, principle of freedom of contract has ruled through the civil law. And then each country has established the special laws regarding the protection of the farmland lessee at the time of the second World War. Today each country has been trying to accomplish the harmony between the lessor and the lessee.
    There are some phenomena of restriction on the farmland lease. Japan has the executive permission under the farmland act. Germany has the farmland lease reporting system. And then France has the similar permission system(e.g. préfet; superficie minimum d'Installation: SMI). This article also addresses the main legal points for example, duration of lease, management of rent, opposing power of the lessee, and the dispute settlement system.
    This study might be able to approximate some solutions to the problems of the korean farmland lease. Korean Farmland Act 1996 provided the concrete rules concerning the protection of the farmland lessee. But those rules has disappeared through the several reforms, and thus there are some gaps between the law and the real transactions. This comparative study can make up the fault of the korean farmland legal system.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 日本 사례
    • Ⅲ. 獨逸 사례
    • Ⅳ. 프랑스 사례
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라에 주는 시사점
    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 日本 사례
    • Ⅲ. 獨逸 사례
    • Ⅳ. 프랑스 사례
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라에 주는 시사점
    • Ⅵ. 글을 맺으며
    • 〈참고문헌〉
    • 〈Abstract〉
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 明淳龜, "프랑스민법전 Code Civil Français" 법문사 2004

    2 尹喆洪, "프랑스革命과 民法의 發展" (10) : 1989

    3 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록(하권)"

    4 김수석, "독일의 농지임대차제 연구-농지임대차법을 중심으로" 37 : 1996

    5 梁彰洙,독일민법전-총칙,채권, "독일민법전-총칙, 채권, 물권" 박영사 2008

    6 윤석환, "농지선매협의제도 도입방안" 농업기반공사 2004

    7 농림수산부, "농지법 해설 및 문답"

    8 한국법제연구원, "농지규제법제에 대한 입법평가 워크숍"

    9 송재일, "농지거래에 관한 법적 연구" 서울대학교 2010

    10 사동천, "농업법강의" 홍익대학교 출판부 2007

    1 明淳龜, "프랑스민법전 Code Civil Français" 법문사 2004

    2 尹喆洪, "프랑스革命과 民法의 發展" (10) : 1989

    3 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록(하권)"

    4 김수석, "독일의 농지임대차제 연구-농지임대차법을 중심으로" 37 : 1996

    5 梁彰洙,독일민법전-총칙,채권, "독일민법전-총칙, 채권, 물권" 박영사 2008

    6 윤석환, "농지선매협의제도 도입방안" 농업기반공사 2004

    7 농림수산부, "농지법 해설 및 문답"

    8 한국법제연구원, "농지규제법제에 대한 입법평가 워크숍"

    9 송재일, "농지거래에 관한 법적 연구" 서울대학교 2010

    10 사동천, "농업법강의" 홍익대학교 출판부 2007

    11 農林水産省構造改善局, "逐條對照 農地關係法" 學陽書房 1996

    12 土屋生, "農業法學(1)" 中央大學出版部 1985

    13 韓國農業法學會, "農業法令整備에 관한 硏究" 농림부 2001

    14 加藤一郞, "農業法, In 法律學全集 50" 有斐閣 1985

    15 朴英昊, "農地賃貸借에 關한 法的 考察" 서울대학교 1989

    16 韓國農村經濟硏究院, "農地賃貸借管理法白書" 1987

    17 韓國農村經濟硏究院, "農地法制定白書" 1995

    18 仁甁五郞, "轉用のための農地賣買․賃貸借" 學陽書房 2009

    19 朴駿緖, "註釋民法 債權各則(2)" 韓國司法行政學會 1999

    20 黃迪仁, "經濟法叢書Ⅴ 農業法" 三知院 1999

    21 遠藤浩, "注解不動産法" 青林書院 1993

    22 郭潤直, "民法注解(ⅩⅤ)" 博英社 2007

    23 郭潤直, "民法注解(Ⅵ)" 博英社 2007

    24 國會 圖書館資料局, "歐洲主要國의 土地法制(海外資料 第75號)"

    25 稲本洋之助, "日本の土地法 : 歴史と現状" 成文堂 2004

    26 尹喆洪, "所有權의 歷史" 法元社 1995

    27 金相容, "土地法, 增補版" 法元社 2004

    28 郭潤直, "債權各論(民法講義Ⅳ), 重版" 博英社 2009

    29 中川善之助, "不動産法大系" 靑林書院新社 1971

    30 Fritz Baur, "Sachenrecht, C.H. Beck, 18. Auflage" 2009

    31 Wolfgang Winkler, "Rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für Pachten in der Landwirtschaft" AgraR 1987

    32 "Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Band 3, 5. Aufl" C.H.Beck 2006

    33 Roland Norer, "Lebendiges Agrarrecht" Springer-Verlag 2005

    34 Marie-Odile Gain, "Le droit rural, l'exploitant agricole et les terres, 2e édition" LexisNexis Litec 2008

    35 Jürgen Lukanow, "Landpachtrecht" Aschendorff Rechtsverlag Münster 2005

    36 Christina Dupeyron, "Jean Theron et Jean-Jacques Barbieri, Droit de l'exploitation, 2e éd" Economica 1994

    37 Christina Dupeyron, "Jean Theron et Jean-Jacques Barbieri, Droit agraire, 1er volume" Economica 1994

    38 Joachim Netz, "Grundstückverkehrsgesetz-Praxiskommentar-, 4. Auflage" Agricola-Verlag GmbH 2008

    39 Jacques Audier, "Droit rural" Dalloz-Sirey 2009

    40 Barabé-Bouchard Véronique et Hérail Marc, "Droit rural" Ellipses 2007

    41 Patrick Courbe, "Droit civil - Les biens" Dalloz-Sirey 2009

    42 Jean-Marie Gilardeau et Jean-Pierre Moreau, "Code rural" Litec 2002

    43 Grimm, "Agrarrecht, 2. Auflage" C.H. Beck 2004

    44 George Turner, "Agrarrecht : Ein Grundriß, 2. Auflage" Ulmer 1998

    45 Christian Grimm, "Agrarrecht" Verlag C.H.Beck 1995

    46 Margaret Rosso Grossman, "Agrarian land law in the western world : essays about agrarian land policy and regulation in twelve countries of the western world" C.A.B. International 1992

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.11 1.11 1.07
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.99 0.99 1.176 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼