신의(信義)와 효(孝), 그리고 또 다른 도덕－김남천의 「신의에 대하여」를 중심으로－ = Trust, Filial Piety, and Another Morality－On Kim Nam-Cheon’s “On Trust”－

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, I tried to understand the fiction “On trust” authored by Kim Nam-cheon while actively taking into consideration the ideological context in Late Colonial Era and the structure of the work.
In “On trust”, Kim Nam-cheon suggested the issue of morality by putting emphasis on the moral value of the trust but downgrading the absolute authority of filial piety(fidelity). In the colonial period, the value of filial piety(fidelity) was the virtue which was required to construct the non-personal duty-relationship based on the heteronomy and was educated as a valuable topic in the classroom in the colonial period. On the other hand, the trust was the virtue which was needed to construct the personal trust-relationship based on the autonomy of the people and which could be justified by the person’s internal conviction. So, the emphasis on the moral value of the trust was not only the downgrading of the absolute authority of filial piety(fidelity) but also the objection to the effort of making the Japanese Emperor centered order.
Although Kim Nam-cheon gave a thought about the morality in late colonial period focusing on the issue of trust, he did not suggest the trust as an alternative to the filial piety(fidelity) but just eroded it. In Late Colonial Era, the value of trust was used as an ideology to persuade Korean people to join the Japanese Army in winning “New Order” construction war (the Pacific War), it cannot be accept as it was at that time. Notwithstanding, as Kim Nam-cheon put emphasis on the moral value of the trust, he can focus on its aspect of the autonomy of the people and expose the fact that “New order” was not based on the people’s autonomy. In addition, he showed the necessity of the effort to search “another morality” which could overcome both the trust and the filial piety(fidelity).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최남선, "학병 권유차 동경에 간 최남선, 이광수의 <東京對談>" 17 (17): 2007

2 나카무라 미츠오, "태평양전쟁의 이상" 이매진 2007

3 이광수, "춘원 이광수 친일문학전집Ⅱ" 평민사 1995

4 "조광, 춘추"

5 최재서, "전환기의 조선문학" 영남대학교출판부 2006

6 이병담, "일제강점기의 ≪普通學校修身書≫ 연구-朝鮮摠監府의 식민지 교육과 지배이데올로기-" 대한일어일문학회 24 (24): 231-250, 2004

7 최유리, "일제 말기 식민지 지배정책연구" 국학자료원 1997

8 이광수, "이광수의 일어 창작 및 산문선" 역락 2007

9 노상래, "암흑기 김남천 소설 연구" 우리말글학회 37 : 337-363, 2006

10 김남천, "신의에 대하여" 조광 1943

11 김재용, "식민주의와 협력" 역락 2003

12 정호웅, "그들의 문학과 생애" 한길사 2008

13 강해수, "‘황도유학’과 ‘도의’ 담론, 그리고 식민지조선" 한국학연구소 (28) : 637-672, 2012

14 이진형, "‘출산(出産)’과 ‘황국신민(皇國臣民)’의 미래- 김남천의 ｢어떤 아침(或る朝)｣을 중심으로" 대중서사학회 (30) : 429-467, 2013